THE NEW "BOB" ORDER ICON
DESIGNED BYREV. J.C. "STEVE" BEILACQUA
bi2.gif |
evenIcan |
ic24-UT |
Iconnie |
Jesus' |
nuicon.jpg |
subprogram.gif |
JESUS'S |
You do realise that there may very well be
ramifications from the Temple of Psychick
Youth and Psychic TV from this new logo.
Minus the pipe, it's the exact same.
'Course, that may not stop me from getting
it permanently inked on my skin as I've
been considering just the plain old TOPY
Psychic Cross for a while.
-andreux
---
saint@prairienet.org
nichole's panties on sale... cheep. inquire within
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: Coming Soon: The "Bob" Icon
From: Jesus
Modemac's rendition is pretty good. But I prefer drawing the stem at a
perfect 45 angle until it lines up with the bottom of the icon. What
can I say I perfer a longer stem on my "Bob".
Jesus
PS I posted a movie that shows the new symbol too, but I'm not sure I
posted iot right, I'm a newbie, what can I say.
Let me post up a regular .gif or jpg next
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: Coming Soon: The "Bob" Icon
From: modemac@modemac.com (Modemac)
So the left side of the Mouth (that's what it is, after all) forms an
equilateral triangle with the Pipe? Now that would have *some* kind of
significance, no doubt. I'm not sure exactly what signifcance, but we can add
some deep bullshit explanation eventually.
--
First Online Church of "Bob"
http://www.modemac.com/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: Happy XXX-Day: The "Bob" Icon - icon.jpg (0/1)
From: Jesus
Modemac wrote:
>
> andreux@eterna.net (andreux) wrote:
> > You do realise that there may very well be
> > ramifications from the Temple of Psychick
> > Youth and Psychic TV from this new logo.
> > Minus the pipe, it's the exact same.
>
> The circle is important, as well. I can see the similarity there, though
> Jesus' explanation of how the Icon is evolved from the Image of "Bob" *should*
> be enough (I hope) to differentiate from the TOPY cross.
> --
I don't know who either of those are so they must have stole it from
us!!!
Actually if their symbol is just the three layer cross, they'll have to
answer to the Templars, the Bizatines and about 30 other sects and cults
that used it before them. But that's the whole point it IS a cultic
symbol worthy of any fanatic, world domination, cult. Goebbels would be
proud
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: Happy XXX-Day: The "Bob" Icon - icon.jpg (0/1)
From: andreux@eterna.net (andreux)
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.slack
Date: Wed, Jul 5, 2000 4:43 PM
Message-ID: <3963b9d5.16901063@news.enteract.com>
modemac@modemac.com (Modemac) wrote:
>
>The circle is important, as well. I can see the similarity there, though
>Jesus' explanation of how the Icon is evolved from the Image of "Bob" *should*
>be enough (I hope) to differentiate from the TOPY cross.
I'm not sure of the legality of that.
That would be like taking the Microsoft Windows
logo, tacking on an extra quarter or two, and
then changing the colors. I'm not absolutely sure
what copyright law has to say about it, though I'm
sure that some form of dialogue can be created
between Genesis P-Orridge and the Father Church
if there's a lawsuit.
Remember, it's only illegal if you get caught.
-andreux
---
saint@prairienet.org
nichole's panties on sale... cheep. inquire within
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: Happy XXX-Day: The "Bob" Icon - icon.jpg (0/1)
From: andreux@eterna.net (andreux)
>I don't know who either of those are so they must have stole it from
>us!!!
>Actually if their symbol is just the three layer cross, they'll have to
>answer to the Templars, the Bizatines and about 30 other sects and cults
>that used it before them. But that's the whole point it IS a cultic
>symbol worthy of any fanatic, world domination, cult. Goebbels would be
>proud
True enough.
The PTV cross has been in use since 1981, I believe.
Though, I'm not sure if it's been registered as a copyright,
and even then, it may not have been registered as one
in the United States. So, maybe a little legal footwork is
appropriate here, but again, unless anyone sues, which is
unlikely, then there shouldn't be a problem. :)
-andreux
---
saint@prairienet.org
nichole's panties on sale... cheep. inquire within
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: Happy XXX-Day: The "Bob" Icon - icon.jpg (0/1)
From: SWILBERT® <nenslo@subgenius.com>
It's only illegal if I BEAT YOU TO DEATH WITH IT for being a bloated
blabbering buffoon. SHUT UP!