Dear Tony:
My sink is clogged. Is that Y2K?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: cns@techcenter.com
Dear Nenslo:
Possibly, if you tried to wash your computer down the drain.
hth,
E.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: friday@fridayjones.com (Friday Jones)
I was watching the Y2Kstream last night, when the announcer came on and
said there was a hostage suitation at a bank somewhere, and then said, "So
far as we know, this situation is not Y2K-related."
What, are bank robbers known for being non-compliant?
--
Eternal salvation or TRIPLE your money back!
www.subgenius.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Name: PopeBlack <popeblack@hotmail.com>
> I know this may be a stupid question but what year is it by the
SubGenius calendar?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: prostata@bronze.coil.com (The WRONG Rev. Prostata Cantata)
2 a.x. of course.
--
"Maybe it's good that I can't afford anti- psychotic
medication. It frees me up to plan the assassination of Deputy Dawg."
-- Bob Sharperson, Systems Analyst
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Popess Lilith von Fraumench <lilith@ZubJenius.com>
In article <friday-ya02408000R0101001756390001@news.tiac.net>, Friday
Jones <friday@fridayjones.com> wrote:
> What, are bank robbers known for being non-compliant?
About the only Y2K non-compliant things I had to deal with this year
are STUPID COMPUTER USERS.
That, and the Perl function localtime() says it's 100 years since 1999,
but a lot of folks think that it's reporting '100' as the calendar
year. So they think Perl has a Y2K bug.
And a few of these: "Hey, why did you guys yank that crappy software
that had a serious Y2K bug? I *need* it!"
And really shitty cellular phone service. Good thing I don't have one.
Now that we're over the hump, can we get back to worrying about
economic collapse, ecodisasters, overpopulation, corporate rule, stupid
politicians, and all the other things we WERE worried about, BEFORE
anyone heard of "Y2K"?
Thanks.
The Prophet Lilith
--
=== Her Ladyship Lilith von Fraumench * http://www.foolspress.com ===
== Prophet--Stage Manager Of The EndTimes--Corrective Phrenologist ==
== Seattle SubGenii! We are the future! http://ssucc.ragnarokr.com ==
== CRUSH YOUR ENEMIES WHILE YOU SLEEP! "Bob"Box140306DallasTX75214 ==
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Charles Mark Bee <c-bee1@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>
Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2000 22:11:48 -0600
Friday Jones wrote:
> What, are bank robbers known for being non-compliant?
Well, this rollover is of course the first hard compatibility test of
the Mid-80's revision of the Feds' secret Convict Monitor Implants.
These guys may well be in autopsy right now to determine the exact
nature of the malfunction.
For more on the nature of the problem see
http://www.bobco.com/liltattler/y2k/update
or something.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: König PrüBe, GmbH <saurkraut@weinerschnitzel.com>
They were women bank robbers, known to be non-compliant,
thick-skulled, hard-headed, uppity, contrary, mean-spirited, flippant,
and generally muley.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Sister Decadence <decadence@subgenius.com>
You're really gay, aren't you?
What a fucking letdown THAT was!
Up one level
Back to document index
Original file name: Is it Y2K?
This file was converted with TextToHTML - (c) Logic n.v.