In article <4s133k$g75@vixen.cso.uiuc.edu>, saint@prairienet.org (Andrew
Matthews) wrote:
> Just you wait until Akron. New songs. Like, real ones. With
> instruments. Just like the Beastie Boys but cooler.
>
Akron?
--
Copyright 1996 by Rev. Ivan Stang / 1st Orthodox Stangian
MegaFisTemple Lodge of People's Covenant Church of the
Wrath of Dobbs Yeti, Resurrected / The SubGenius Foundation,Inc.
PO Box 140306 Dallas TX 75214 / Fax 214-320-1561 / PRABOB
http://www.subgenius.com -- SubSITE of Slack
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: saint@prairienet.org (Andrew Matthews)
In a previous article, revjack@radix.net (Rev. Jack) says:
>Previously, Miss Sakamoto wrote:
>
>: On Jul 09, 1996 00:28:57 in article <Re: X-Day Drill Report>,
>: 'revjack@radix.net (Rev. Jack)' wrote:
>:
>:
>: >Top Ten things I liked about the X-Day Drill, in no particular order:
>:
>: What? Nothing about me? I'm crushed! No really...
>
>You have better legs than Fiorella Terenzi! I kept wanting to stick a twenty
>in that garter, but I didn't want St. Andrew's tent pole up my ass.
Hell, you should have! Would have helped defray the gas money
costs!
Well, sure, it would have been HER $20 bill, but *I* could have
been wearing that garter JUST AS EASILY...
Thank your lucky ShorDurPerSaves...
$T.&REUX,KSC
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: saint@prairienet.org (Andrew Matthews)
In a previous article, phred39@mailp.starnetinc.com (Pope Phrederick Q. Armageddon) says:
>ljduchez@en.com (Lou Duchez) spake thus in:
>>Pee Kitty (Pkitty@cris.com) wrote:
>>: Someone once said "we all put on masks when we get online." I think it's
>>: more true to say we just add a little makeup and dress up a bit; the basic
>>: self is still there.
>>For most of us in this neck of the woods, anyway.
>
> I, for one disagree. My online persona is a direct match with my
>offline persona: Dour, impersonable, curmudgeonly with just a little
>hint of mint....
Ah, but your ALTER EGO, Snuggles, the warm fluffy bunny...
Zoinks! I've said too much...
$T.&REUX,KSC
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: angela@Exis.Net (Sophia Anifantakis)
Pee Kitty (Pkitty@cris.com) wrote:
: Okay, let's clear this up RIGHT NOW. They were prismatic, and changed
: colors depending on YOUR mood. Meg was obviously happy in a bit of a
: mellow way if she saw orange/yellow//blue/yellow. Selina saw GREEN?
: Oooo...I ain't sayin' what THAT's all about... As for showing up on film,
: good luck. They tend to default to true-neutral-prismophilia on film IF
: THEY SHOW UP AT ALL. If you see Pink/Purple//Black/Yellow, it's a sure
: sign that your camera has NHGH spirits in it and must be destroyed.
Well, you had a different pair on each day and it's hard to remember the
combinations. I think you had a blue and purple or something one day and
a yellow one and maybe a green the second day. I can't remember..but
they contrasted pretty sharply...I'll have to check the pictures.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Philip A. Daigle" <philipda@tiac.net>
First Thessalonians
Chapter 1
1Paul, and Silvanus, and Timotheus, unto the church of the Thessalonians
which is in God the Father and in the Lord Jesus Christ: Grace be unto
you, and peace, from God our Father, and the Lord Jesus Christ. =
2We give thanks to God always for you all, making mention of you in our
prayers; 3Remembering without ceasing your work of faith, and labour of
love, and patience of hope in our Lord Jesus Christ, in the sight of God
and our Father; 4Knowing, brethren beloved, your election of God. 5For
our gospel came not unto you in word only, but also in power, and in the
Holy Ghost, and in much assurance; as ye know what manner of men we were
among you for your sake. =
6And ye became followers of us, and of the Lord, having received the
word in much affliction, with joy of the Holy Ghost: 7So that ye were
ensamples to all that believe in Macedonia and Achaia. 8For from you
sounded out the word of the Lord not only in Macedonia and Achaia, but
also in every place your faith to God-ward is spread abroad; so that we
need not to speak any thing. 9For they themselves shew of us what manner
of entering in we had unto you, and how ye turned to God from idols to
serve the living and true God; 10And to wait for his Son from heaven,
whom he raised from the dead, even Jesus, which delivered us from the
wrath to come. =
Chapter 2
1For yourselves, brethren, know our entrance in unto you, that it was
not in vain: 2But even after that we had suffered before, and were
shamefully entreated, as ye know, at Philippi, we were bold in our God
to speak unto you the gospel of God with much contention. 3For our
exhortation was not of deceit, nor of uncleanness, nor in guile: 4But as
we were allowed of God to be put in trust with the gospel, even so we
speak; not as pleasing men, but God, which trieth our hearts. 5For
neither at any time used we flattering words, as ye know, nor a cloke of
covetousness; God is witness: 6Nor of men sought we glory, neither of
you, nor yet of others, when we might have been burdensome, as the
apostles of Christ. =
7But we were gentle among you, even as a nurse cherisheth her children:
8So being affectionately desirous of you, we were willing to have
imparted unto you, not the gospel of God only, but also our own souls,
because ye were dear unto us. 9For ye remember, brethren, our labour and
travail: for labouring night and day, because we would not be chargeable
unto any of you, we preached unto you the gospel of God. 10Ye are
witnesses, and God also, how holily and justly and unblameably we
behaved ourselves among you that believe: 11As ye know how we exhorted
and comforted and charged every one of you, as a father doth his
children, 12 That ye would walk worthy of God, who hath called you unto
his kingdom and glory. =
13For this cause also thank we God without ceasing, because, when ye
received the word of God which ye heard of us, ye received it not as the
word of men, but as it is in truth, the word of God, which effectually
worketh also in you that believe. 14For ye, brethren, became followers
of the churches of God which in Judaea are in Christ Jesus: for ye also
have suffered like things of your own countrymen, even as they have of
the Jews: 15Who both killed the Lord Jesus, and their own prophets, and
have persecuted us; and they please not God, and are contrary to all
men: 16Forbidding us to speak to the Gentiles that they might be saved,
to fill up their sins alway: for the wrath is come upon them to the
uttermost. =
17But we, brethren, being taken from you for a short time in presence,
not in heart, endeavoured the more abundantly to see your face with
great desire. 18Wherefore we would have come unto you, even I Paul, once
and again; but Satan hindered us. 19For what is our hope, or joy, or
crown of rejoicing? Are not even ye in the presence of our Lord Jesus
Christ at his coming? 20For ye are our glory and joy. =
Chapter 3
1Wherefore when we could no longer forbear, we thought it good to be
left at Athens alone; 2And sent Timotheus, our brother, and minister of
God, and our fellowlabourer in the gospel of Christ, to establish you,
and to comfort you concerning your faith: 3That no man should be moved
by these afflictions: for yourselves know that we are appointed
thereunto. 4For verily, when we were with you, we told you before that
we should suffer tribulation; even as it came to pass, and ye know. 5For
this cause, when I could no longer forbear, I sent to know your faith,
lest by some means the tempter have tempted you, and our labour be in
vain. =
6But now when Timotheus came from you unto us, and brought us good
tidings of your faith and charity, and that ye have good remembrance of
us always, desiring greatly to see us, as we also to see you:
7Therefore, brethren, we were comforted over you in all our affliction
and distress by your faith: 8For now we live, if ye stand fast in the
Lord. 9For what thanks can we render to God again for you, for all the
joy wherewith we joy for your sakes before our God; 10Night and day
praying exceedingly that we might see your face, and might perfect that
which is lacking in your faith? =
11Now God himself and our Father, and our Lord Jesus Christ, direct our
way unto you. 12And the Lord make you to increase and abound in love
one toward another, and toward all men, even as we do toward you: 13To
the end he may stablish your hearts unblameable in holiness before God,
even our Father, at the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ with all his
saints. =
Chapter 4
1Furthermore then we beseech you, brethren, and exhort you by the Lord
Jesus, that as ye have received of us how ye ought to walk and to please
God, so ye would abound more and more. 2For ye know what commandments
we gave you by the Lord Jesus. 3For this is the will of God, even your
sanctification, that ye should abstain from fornication: 4That every one
of you should know how to possess his vessel in sanctification and
honour; 5Not in the lust of concupiscence, even as the Gentiles which
know not God: 6That no man go beyond and defraud his brother in any
matter: because that the Lord is the avenger of all such, as we also
have forewarned you and testified. 7For God hath not called us unto
uncleanness, but unto holiness. 8He therefore that despiseth, despiseth
not man, but God, who hath also given unto us his holy Spirit. =
9But as touching brotherly love ye need not that I write unto you: for
ye yourselves are taught of God to love one another. 10And indeed ye do
it toward all the brethren which are in all Macedonia: but we beseech
you, brethren, that ye increase more and more; 11And that ye study to be
quiet, and to do your own business, and to work with your own hands, as
we commanded you; 12That ye may walk honestly toward them that are
without, and that ye may have lack of nothing. =
13But I would not have you to be ignorant, brethren, concerning them
which are asleep, that ye sorrow not, even as others which have no hope.
14For if we believe that Jesus died and rose again, even so them also
which sleep in Jesus will God bring with him. 15For this we say unto you
by the word of the Lord, that we which are alive and remain unto the
coming of the Lord shall not prevent them which are asleep. 16For the
Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of
the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall
rise first: 17Then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up
together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so
shall we ever be with the Lord. 18Wherefore comfort one another with
these words. =
Chapter 5
1But of the times and the seasons, brethren, ye have no need that I
write unto you. 2For yourselves know perfectly that the day of the Lord
so cometh as a thief in the night. 3For when they shall say, Peace and
safety; then sudden destruction cometh upon them, as travail upon a
woman with child; and they shall not escape. 4But ye, brethren, are not
in darkness, that that day should overtake you as a thief. 5Ye are all
the children of light, and the children of the day: we are not of the
night, nor of darkness. =
6Therefore let us not sleep, as do others; but let us watch and be
sober. 7For they that sleep sleep in the night; and they that be drunken
are drunken in the night. 8But let us, who are of the day, be sober,
putting on the breastplate of faith and love; and for an helmet, the
hope of salvation. 9For God hath not appointed us to wrath, but to
obtain salvation by our Lord Jesus Christ, 10Who died for us, that,
whether we wake or sleep, we should live together with him. =
11Wherefore comfort yourselves together, and edify one another, even as
also ye do. 12And we beseech you, brethren, to know them which labour
among you, and are over you in the Lord, and admonish you; 13And to
esteem them very highly in love for their work=92s sake. And be at peace
among yourselves. 14Now we exhort you, brethren, warn them that are
unruly, comfort the feebleminded, support the weak, be patient toward
all men. 15See that none render evil for evil unto any man; but ever
follow that which is good, both among yourselves, and to all men. =
16Rejoice evermore. 17Pray without ceasing. 18In every thing give
thanks: for this is the will of God in Christ Jesus concerning you.
19Quench not the Spirit. 20Despise not prophesyings. 21Prove all things;
hold fast that which is good. 22Abstain from all appearance of evil. =
23And the very God of peace sanctify you wholly; and I pray God your
whole spirit and soul and body be preserved blameless unto the coming of
our Lord Jesus Christ. 24Faithful is he that calleth you, who also will
do it. 25Brethren, pray for us. 26Greet all the brethren with an holy
kiss. 27I charge you by the Lord that this epistle be read unto all the
holy brethren. 28The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with you. Amen. =
[The first epistle to the Thessalonians was written from Athens.] =
The King James Version, (Cambridge: Cambridge) 1769.
-- =
philipda@tiac.net Flipper-
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: dynasor@infi.net (Dennis McClain-Furmanski)
On 07-13-96, phred39@mailp.starnetinc wrote:
> ljduchez@en.com (Lou Duchez) spake thus in:
>Pee Kitty (Pkitty@cris.com) wrote:
>:
>: Someone once said "we all put on masks when we get online." I think it's
>: more true to say we just add a little makeup and dress up a bit; the
basic
>: self is still there.
>For most of us in this neck of the woods, anyway.
> I, for one disagree. My online persona is a direct match with my
> offline persona: Dour, impersonable, curmudgeonly with just a little
> hint of mint....
> Yet another posting from those WONDERFUL folks at:
Oh, can it Phred. After they've met you it's no use to lie. I held my
tounge ever since Cleveland. but it's too late now.
Phred is a nice guy, and real friendly.
Now @ndrew, he was nice and sulky.
Why can't you be like your brother?
* 2qwk! 2.0 * Experience is the comb life gives you after you're bald.
--
Doktor DynaSoar Iridium -- dynasor@infi.net -- Punctuator of Evolution
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: ljduchez@en.com (Lou Duchez)
Pee Kitty (Pkitty@cris.com) wrote:
: TarlaStar (bmyers@ionet.net) spewed forth:
: > Let me just add this...alt.slack may be the official newsgroup of the
: > Church of the SubGenius, but the two are not necessarily the same. The
: > thing that we (the alt.slack clusterfuck group) all found somewhat
: > surprising was how close we were to each other's mental pictures of
: > one another. Pee Kitty was the only one who suprised us all, I think.
:
: Waitasec. I really want to know here. What mental picture did everyone
: have of me before?
I figured tall 'n' thin with brown hair. A build not unlike $t. &reux's,
actually. With a pixie-like smile on your face at all times.
: > you can keep the rest of us as you have us. It's kind of interesting
: > to discover just how much of the personality actually bleeds through
: > this medium.
:
: Someone once said "we all put on masks when we get online." I think it's
: more true to say we just add a little makeup and dress up a bit; the basic
: self is still there.
For most of us in this neck of the woods, anyway.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: qrolaren@usa.pipeline.com(Miss Sakamoto)
On Jul 16, 1996 01:53:20 in article <Re: X-Day Drill Report>,
'saint@prairienet.org (Andrew Matthews)' wrote:
>Ah, but your ALTER EGO, Snuggles, the warm fluffy bunny...
I think I'm going to puke. Phred, SAY IT AIN'T SO!
--
"Some people sing love songs/Everybody's got one/This isn't my love
song/It's more like my love gone wrong song..."
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: nickie@metronet.com ( Rev. Nickie)
In article <4s133k$g75@vixen.cso.uiuc.edu>, saint@prairienet.org (Andrew
Matthews) wrote:
~ Feh. If I get one more comment about how I look like Howard
~ Stern, I'm gonna puke. "Bob"-dammit, that guy copied my style
~ and now EVERYONE is after me.
I think you look like Howard Stern, except I mean his butt.
With all due respect, of course.
:)
(Look a smiley! How happy it must make you feel inside!)
--
*you have been blessed by a communication from*
-----Rev. Nickie the Hated
http://www.rlabs.com/revnickie/
***************
"For you have heard that I rant against the CON, but you have been
told lies by the dupes and Pharisees, for I bring not words against the
enemies of "Bob", but a new LAW. For I am the voice that cries 'Neener,
neener' in the wilderness, who separates the Quick from the Dead."
(Ejac. VII.9)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: petehip@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Peter Hipwell)
In article <4sci20$miv@herald.concentric.net> Pkitty@cris.com (Pee Kitty) writes:
>Pee Kitty (Pkitty@cris.com) spewed forth:
>> Okay, let's clear this up RIGHT NOW. They were prismatic, and changed
>> colors depending on YOUR mood. Meg was obviously happy in a bit of a
>> mellow way if she saw orange/yellow//blue/yellow. Selina saw GREEN?
>> Oooo...I ain't sayin' what THAT's all about... As for showing up on film,
>> good luck. They tend to default to true-neutral-prismophilia on film IF
>> THEY SHOW UP AT ALL. If you see Pink/Purple//Black/Yellow, it's a sure
>> sign that your camera has NHGH spirits in it and must be destroyed.
>
>Hell, where's Hipwell? He can explain this shit a HELLUVALOT better than I
>can...
>
We are born into delusion, from which we grow into greater delusions.
Prismatic colour is merely an abberent manifestation of grey. Pope
Hadrian VII understood this fact: colour exists no more tangibly than
irony. There are various types of colour anomia; loss of ability to name
colours. Some forms allow for recall from memory ("a banana is
yellow"). Some do not. Cerebral achromatopsia is a condition in which
colour cannot be perceived at all. Colour is a sophistry we are
elegantly persuaded of by our neurological makeup. Like All Things,
once you attempt to dissemble the concept into coherent subunits, you
find that you are considering something that does not partake of
plexity in its articulation, but is more like a tapestry: the
individual threads picked apart do not tell you much about the picture
you began with. There is wool without pulling, and there is pulling
without wool. All is Of Grey and Of Dots; the rest is Spurious.
--
remememedismemberationalessencephalotherroarrogleamitrouselephagentryagain
**** ZPK SITE PLUG: http://www.cogsci.ed.ac.uk/~petehip/ZPKIntro.html ****
remementalistonkalligatrememeiostretchinderogathermalicentichoruptamessinge
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: friday@cybercom.net (Friday Jones)
> : TarlaStar (bmyers@ionet.net) spewed forth:
>
> : > Let me just add this...alt.slack may be the official newsgroup of the
> : > Church of the SubGenius, but the two are not necessarily the same. The
> : > thing that we (the alt.slack clusterfuck group) all found somewhat
> : > surprising was how close we were to each other's mental pictures of
> : > one another. Pee Kitty was the only one who suprised us all, I think.
I couldn't find most of you guys ... where were you hiding in the woods?
I saw Pee Kitty, Lou Duchez, Rev. Jack and MegEliz (sorry I didn't get a
chance to say bye Mom) - the rest of the time I was stuck with the Dallas
farts.
Next time, bring a spirit staff or totem pole or have a sound chip playing
the 'bing!' of a computer being turned on. Or something.
- The Lost Irreverend Friday Jones
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: angela@Exis.Net (Sophia Anifantakis)
: > ljduchez@en.com (Lou Duchez) spake thus in:
:
: >Pee Kitty (Pkitty@cris.com) wrote:
: >:
: >: Someone once said "we all put on masks when we get online." I think it's
: >: more true to say we just add a little makeup and dress up a bit; the
: basic
: >: self is still there.
:
: >For most of us in this neck of the woods, anyway.
:
: > I, for one disagree. My online persona is a direct match with my
: > offline persona: Dour, impersonable, curmudgeonly with just a little
: > hint of mint....
: > Yet another posting from those WONDERFUL folks at:
I'm pretty much the same too, though for people that are shy it's alot
easier to type to someone sometimes than to talk in person, but still the
personality is the same. To me everyone seemed about the same in person
except for Meg who seemed alot more subdued in person. I'm sure though
alot of people take on different personalities on-line, or rather
hidden parts of their real personality might get the nerve to pop out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: qrolaren@usa.pipeline.com(Miss Sakamoto)
On Jul 12, 1996 21:47:46 in article <Re: X-Day Drill Report>,
'Pkitty@cris.com (Pee Kitty)' wrote:
>Miss Sakamoto (qrolaren@usa.pipeline.com) spewed forth:
>> On Jul 10, 1996 21:44:50 in article <Re: X-Day Drill Report>,
>> 'ljduchez@en.com (Lou Duchez)' wrote:
>>
>>
>> >BTW, Scully is the red-haired babe on "X-Files". Looks sort of like
>> >Friday, though not as attractive.
>>
>> Pee Kay, I can send you a picture of her, if you want...
>
>Of Scully or Friday?
Scully.
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: king@redrose.net (St. Pomp Prideless)
In article <4si3fn$dg9@herald.concentric.net>, Pkitty@cris.com (Pee Kitty)
wrote:
> Chris Miller (chrism@pinn.net) spewed forth:
> > When someone pointed her out I was expecting a real babe to appear.
> <unflattering depiction snipped>
> > To the girls that are jealous of her looks, let me just say be glad
> > you don't look like that.
>
> Chris, most people 'round these here parts care more about how SEXY
> someone is, not just how they look. You see, looks are variable; what one
> person likes is never what another likes, unless you're one of the many
> who let Cosmo and MTV tell you what's "attractive" and what's not, happily
> embracing the concept of a universal standard of hot and not. Apparently
> you seem to fall into this class. And that's just fine...everyone has the
> right to be as pink as they want. From NotAtAll to just a TEENY bit to
> half/n/half to quite-a-bit to Completely to Thomas K. Odell...it's another
> one of those rights, like the one to free speech. Exercise your rights,
> man.
Yeah, but perhaps his eyes are naturally a bit x-ray, and he got a glimpse
of just how unsassy her organs were organized. The funny thing about me
is, I'm attracted to girls who are so goddamned "MTV" beautiful, that you
never actually see them on MTV. Either the scouts are afraid of them, or
they avoid the scouts. You've got to be kidding yourself to think Cindy
Crawford holds the universal standard. She's a mutt, through and
through. It's the undeclared law of physics: Exploitation eludes the
truelly beautiful. And I'm not just talkin' about that pussy assed
"beauty lies in the eye of the beholder" beauty. I'm talkin' about the
hardcore, so "universal" it can't be disputed beauty, and..........oops,
got to be careful, I keep forgetting that the book keeper down in Dallas
happens to be hooked, strapped, and ready to snap!
--
"What's goin' on.........Nothin'......... OK!"
Pomp Prideless
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: phred39@mailp.starnetinc.com (Pope Phrederick Q. Armageddon)
ljduchez@en.com (Lou Duchez) spake thus in:
>Pee Kitty (Pkitty@cris.com) wrote:
>:
>: Someone once said "we all put on masks when we get online." I think it's
>: more true to say we just add a little makeup and dress up a bit; the basic
>: self is still there.
>For most of us in this neck of the woods, anyway.
I, for one disagree. My online persona is a direct match with my
offline persona: Dour, impersonable, curmudgeonly with just a little
hint of mint....
Yet another posting from those WONDERFUL folks at:
***B A B B L E O N E N T E R P R I S E S***
Notions & Potions!
Quotations for Donations!
est. 1971 a.d.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: ljduchez@en.com (Lou Duchez)
Dennis McClain-Furmanski (dynasor@infi.net) wrote:
: On 07-12-96, jrp@seachange-tech.com wrote:
:
: > Greetings, mutants.
:
: > What I found most interesting about the XDay Drill was it's lack of
: > anything particularlly unexpected.
:
: Which of course means we've got it down. That *is* the purpose of drill --
: to practice for the real thing.
And you know, if you're expecting everyone else to entertain you, you're
going to be disappointed. It's like alt.slack: ya gotta feed the kitty
to eat some pussy. Or something.
Next time 'round, stand up on a tree stump, pull down your pants, and go
apeshit! That might start up the kind of action you want. Myself, I
went there to get what I wanted, and I found it: just hangin' out and
eating dead animals.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: saint@prairienet.org (Andrew Matthews)
In a previous article, i.stang@metronet.com (Rev. Ivan Stang) says:
>> Just you wait until Akron. New songs. Like, real ones. With
>> instruments. Just like the Beastie Boys but cooler.
>Akron?
Yup. As far as I know, Rev. G. Grrrinder's still planning
on throwing a Devival on Sept. 14th.
And no Stang 101 rant!
'Magine that!
$T.&REUX,KSC
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: saint@prairienet.org (Andrew Matthews)
In a previous article, qrolaren@usa.pipeline.com (Miss Sakamoto) says:
>>I think you look like Howard Stern, except I mean his butt.
>
>Just less personable. Besides, Howard Stern is a cutie, so QUIT YOUR
>BITCHING, &reux! :-)
&REUX's do what &REUXs do best... bitch and whine...
$T.&REUX,KSC
OFFICIAL JEHOVA HATES PHRED PAGE: http://www.prairienet.org/~saint/jhp.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: ljduchez@en.com (Lou Duchez)
Andrew Matthews (saint@prairienet.org) wrote:
:
: In a previous article, nickie@metronet.com (Rev. Nickie) says:
:
: >~ Feh. If I get one more comment about how I look like Howard
: >~ Stern, I'm gonna puke. "Bob"-dammit, that guy copied my style
: >~ and now EVERYONE is after me.
: >I think you look like Howard Stern, except I mean his butt.
:
: cool beans, I can be the alt.slack "butthead" because I resemble
: Howard Stern's butt. groovilicious.
Have you been a bad boy? Do you need to be punished? ROTFL
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: clavis@ix.netcom.com(the Grand Clavister)
In <4sihjh$2r9@antares.en.com> ljduchez@en.com (Lou Duchez) writes:
>
>Chris Miller (chrism@pinn.net) wrote:
>
>: Though I'm usually a lurker, read but don't post, having
followed
>: the Deathchic debates and attending the X-Day Drill and actually
seeing her
>: first hand I felt I should speak up.
>
>[unpleasant description of Nickie's appearance deleted]
>
>: To the girls that are jealous of her looks, let me just say be
glad
>: you don't look like that.
>
>Chris, it's true that Nickie probably wouldn't land a role on
>"Baywatch". Neither would I. And neither would you.
>
>Nonetheless, I think she's a good-looking gal. There are many
standards
>of beauty one can go by, and it's EXTREMELY limiting to rely only on
the
>Con's Barbie doll standard (as exemplified by Pam Anderson).
>
>Besides, the only truly non-Pink measure of beauty is what ya do with
>yourself. Pam Anderson uglifies herself by reducing herself to such a
>superficial shell. An Uberfemme of limited physical appeal makes up
for
>it a thousand ways through sheer personality.
>
>Mind you, I'm still perplexed at the point of the Spanking Ritual (I
>thought we weren't supposed to feel guilty about anything or succumb
to
>the Con's standards of what is "naughty", tee-hee), but I guess the
rest of
>the crowd was as well.
Well, at least I wasn't there THIS time!
Anyway, there's only one way to judge the sexiness (and, therefore, in
some sense, worthiness) of an Uberfemme: the Tantric Temperature. The
Angle of Approach. The Mohr Scale. YOU DIG! Nickie got the shit!
Straight up. And I mean that.
the Grand Clavister
[Looking for references to him since 1970]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: i.stang@metronet.com (Rev. Ivan Stang)
In article <4sncl4$1db@dfw-ixnews2.ix.netcom.com>,
clavis@ix.netcom.com(the Grand Clavister) wrote:
> In <4sihjh$2r9@antares.en.com> ljduchez@en.com (Lou Duchez) writes:
> >
> >Chris Miller (chrism@pinn.net) wrote:
> >
> >: Though I'm usually a lurker, read but don't post, having
> followed
> >: the Deathchic debates and attending the X-Day Drill and actually
> seeing her
> >: first hand I felt I should speak up.
> >
> >[unpleasant description of Nickie's appearance deleted]
> >
> >: To the girls that are jealous of her looks, let me just say be
> glad
> >: you don't look like that.
> >
Who the fuck is this Chris Miller idiot? Another one of those chickenshit
vampires that stands around and LISTENS, with a smirk on his face? Somehow
I don't remember you, tough-guy.
Funny how that works.
Can't wait until we meet again.
Lurkers. Sheeeeit.
Stang
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: i.stang@metronet.com (Rev. Ivan Stang)
> : On 07-12-96, jrp@seachange-tech.com wrote:
> :
> : > Greetings, mutants.
> :
> : > What I found most interesting about the XDay Drill was it's lack of
> : > anything particularlly unexpected.
> :
You EXPECTED us to fulfill the promises of Greys, violence, nudity, drugs,
Prairie Squid live (well, dead) sex, saucer sightings, fine jams,
interactive Jesus-scourging and Dobbs-crucifying? Not to mention EXCELLENT
ranting by first-timers with REAL GUTS?
MAN, you must REALLY be a dumbass. Whoever the fuck YOU are.
We hadn't actually INTENDED on providing ANY of that. I wonder what people
like you would have done had we left it up to you. Sat on a bench by
yourself under the pavillion waiting for something to happen? Jacking off
behind the bushes while watching everybody else have a fucking blast?
CHRIST but anonymous lurker chickenshit critics make me ILL!!! How is it
that the EMOTIONAL CRIPPLES who can't even say "HELLO" without having a
nervous breakdown always end up being the fucking JUDGES??
Stang
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: nickie@metronet.com ( Rev. Nickie)
In article <i.stang-2107961312340001@dal151.metronet.com>,
i.stang@metronet.com (Rev. Ivan Stang) wrote:
~
~ Lurkers. Sheeeeit.
Yeah, man, I know it. I WOULD dare it to come up to me and say what it has
to say to my face, but I know it'd never go down.
I'm not really curious about why it wanted to say stuff about me on the
Internet. It's obvious that this is the only medium in which it feels
confident enough to express it's opinions - ie, where it can't be hurt -
but are you afraid of me cause your mommy didn't love you, or do you just
fear real women because you can only relate sexually to little boys?
Besides, it's ridiculous to assume anyone is jealous of my looks. If we
all looked the same, it'd be just like the Conspiracy. Which is clearly
where your alliegences belong.
--
*you have been blessed by a communication from*
-----Rev. Nickie the Hated
http://www.rlabs.com/revnickie/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: 1Ol01O@radix.net (MegaLiz)
i.stang@metronet.com (Rev. Ivan Stang) wrote:
: We hadn't actually INTENDED on providing ANY of that. I wonder what people
: like you would have done had we left it up to you. Sat on a bench by
: yourself under the pavillion waiting for something to happen? Jacking off
: behind the bushes while watching everybody else have a fucking blast?
Hey! Somebody told me that jacking off in the bushes was an official
event! You mean I did that for NOTHING? I was suppose to have won it
too. Where's my goddam PRIZE?!?
: CHRIST but anonymous lurker chickenshit critics make me ILL!!! How is it
: that the EMOTIONAL CRIPPLES who can't even say "HELLO" without having a
: nervous breakdown always end up being the fucking JUDGES??
I said "hello" meekly and with the greatest respect. Didn't I? We need
to add that to the schedule for next year: Stang Greeting and
Eighthead Rubbing Event. And anybody who won't touch it has to go
home.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
My sig is not under construction. It's deader than dead.
But MY NEWSGROUP alt.foot.fat-free LIVES!
Hear the pitter-patter! Thrill to the podiatry! While it lasts!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: i.stang@metronet.com (Rev. Ivan Stang)
In article <31f2bb98.99798834@news1.radix.net>, 1Ol01O@radix.net wrote:
> i.stang@metronet.com (Rev. Ivan Stang) wrote:
>
> : We hadn't actually INTENDED on providing ANY of that. I wonder what people
> : like you would have done had we left it up to you. Sat on a bench by
> : yourself under the pavillion waiting for something to happen? Jacking off
> : behind the bushes while watching everybody else have a fucking blast?
>
> Hey! Somebody told me that jacking off in the bushes was an official
> event! You mean I did that for NOTHING? I was suppose to have won it
> too. Where's my goddam PRIZE?!?
You get to Rub the Bump.
>
> : CHRIST but anonymous lurker chickenshit critics make me ILL!!! How is it
> : that the EMOTIONAL CRIPPLES who can't even say "HELLO" without having a
> : nervous breakdown always end up being the fucking JUDGES??
>
> I said "hello" meekly and with the greatest respect. Didn't I? We need
> to add that to the schedule for next year: Stang Greeting and
> Eighthead Rubbing Event. And anybody who won't touch it has to go
> home.
I wasn't talking to YOU, I meant that other guy. I remember you and Rev.
Jack saying "hello" and as I told him, I'm sorry we didn't to hang out
more, 'cause you guys seemed like you were real FOR REAL. There were many
folks however who wouldn't give me the common decency of an introduction
but yet felt it was their right to stand around gaping rudely at the rest
of us, and then GRIPED about our event on alt.slack, and that gives me the
creeps. I understand that some people are just plain shy. Fine. And some
are REALLY messed up and have deep psychological problems. Fine. I
actually sympathize. But I DON'T want to later see such people CRITICIZING
the rest of us from the safety of their computer screens.
Unless they can be FUCKING FUNNY while doing it. Then all is forgiven.
But that asshole yapping about Nickie's LOOKS -- jesus. Where I come from,
one doesn't go PUBLICLY DISCUSSING a woman's LOOKS as if she was just
another MTV meat puppet. I don't care if she's the ugliest joker in the
world, you just don't do it. Unless you're one of those guys who are SO
FUCKED that you KNOW you're NEVER gonna get any for free (and probably
can't afford to buy any). I mean it's just plain LOW. It bespeaks a very
degenerated character.
Besides, I strongly disagree with the guy. I think Nickie is a very sexy
looking number. For a CHILD. But so what? As was said earlier here, it
ain't the meat anyway, it's the motion.
I dunno, it just grosses me out to see a bunch of "jocks" sit around
talking about how "that chick's HOT" and "that chick's a DOG" while they
themselves are usually beer-gutted, foul-breathed, socially inept
poebucker slobs (much like I was before I lost my beer gut -- back when I
was 23 or so).
Every now and then you see someone on the Internet say, "Well, I must go
now and have sex." Or "I've been fucking all night and..." That kind of
shit is a dead give-away that the speaker is probably an untouchable.
That Wise Old Arbiter of Taste
Stang
--
Copyright 1996 by Rev. Ivan Stang / 1st Orthodox Stangian
MegaFisTemple Lodge of People's Covenant Church of the
Wrath of Dobbs Yeti, Resurrected / The SubGenius Foundation,Inc.
PO Box 140306 Dallas TX 75214 / Fax 214-320-1561 / PRABOB
http://www.subgenius.com -- SubSITE of Slack
Original file name: Re X-Day Drill Report
This file was converted with TextToHTML - (c) Logic n.v.