I figure that those of you who could not attend the X-Day celebration at
Brushwood would like to know that Stang got covered in motor oil and
feathered by bollixing this whole thing up. Apparently, on "Bob's" original
writing down of the information, he had written the year as "199'8"--in
other words, they had looked at the number upside-down, and X-Day is really
due in 8,661. That's what he *claimed*, anyway.
I was fighting the Conspiracy before I discovered the Church--joining just
provided extra resources and ammunition to carry on the Good Fight. For
me, the whole "X-Day" deal was a bonus... As far as I'm concerned, the
Church didn't even need a "Bob" in order to work right. The sensation
known as SLACK was enough; slack destroys fear, and without fear, the
Conspiracy cannot control us. They can injure us, incarcerate us, and even
*kill* us, but without fear, the mind remains free to create or to solve or
to relax in the safety of its own delusions until such time as the
Conspiracy may be properly engaged in battle.
The thing that disturbed me most about this weekend was how much it looked
like the Church was starting to SELL OUT to mass media. Admittedly, hell,
Stang and Co. admitted that they were after the bucks from the very start,
but as ShorDurPerSav Bill Hicks would tell you (were he alive), when you
sacrifice the integrity of your *message*, you sacrifice the integrity of
your SOUL. If what I saw and heard was accurate, we may see the Church
again, but with the "Bob" they warned us about in ARISE--a "nice Bob," one
that isn't as scary as he once was.
If you want more information, feel free to e-mail me at jacques@cat.net.
I'm off to rest up, clean the blood off my gear, and then go out and FIGHT
THE CONSPIRACY, which was the whole damned point, as far as I'm concerned.
YOURS IN HELLE,
CODEMASTER JACQUES TREATMENT
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Ringo Sartre <motorhead@radixKEANU.net>
Jacques wrote:
> The thing that disturbed me most about this weekend was how much it looked
> like the Church was starting to SELL OUT to mass media.
So, you're *FINALLY* starting to get the point?
Do everyone a favor and live up to your "Subject:" line.
~R
(not a SubG, but I DO play one on TV)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: mbaranczak@FuckSpam.earthlink.net (Mike Baranczak)
In article <01bda85f$1aa7b580$06839ecf@ogyfobac>, jacques@cat.net wrote:
> I figure that those of you who could not attend the X-Day celebration at
> Brushwood would like to know that Stang got covered in motor oil and
> feathered by bollixing this whole thing up. Apparently, on "Bob's" original
> writing down of the information, he had written the year as "199'8"--in
> other words, they had looked at the number upside-down, and X-Day is really
> due in 8,661. That's what he *claimed*, anyway.
> [...]
ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME??? That little shitwit had 20 years to think up
an excuse and THAT is the best he could come up with?!! I'm SO
dissapointed.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: e/wbear@hibernia.ca (Bear22)
In article <6npciv$ode$1@news1.Radix.Net>, Ringo Sartre
<motorhead@radixKEANU.net> wrote:
> Jacques wrote:
>
> > The thing that disturbed me most about this weekend was how much it looked
> > like the Church was starting to SELL OUT to mass media.
>
> So, you're *FINALLY* starting to get the point?
>
> Do everyone a favor and live up to your "Subject:" line.
>
> ~R
> (not a SubG, but I DO play one on TV)
some subs ARE TV's
22
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: terrygibson@rocketmail.com
>
Aw jeese, I'll bet Stang and the gang are real upset
that you think they're "gettin way too
commercial................ man";
what I saw was a fair number of "normals" mixed
into the group being exposed to stuff that hopefully
will inspire them feel that its ok to be "weird" and
like it.
Oh yeah, Stang was not covered with motor oil as
you mentioned, it was honey, then the feathers.
-----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==-----
http://www.dejanews.com/rg_mkgrp.xp Create Your Own Free Member Forum
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: The Mitochondrion <mito@panix.com>
"Jacques Treatment" <marcusm@teleweb.net> writes:
> The thing that disturbed me most about this weekend was how much it looked
> like the Church was starting to SELL OUT to mass media. Admittedly, hell,
> Stang and Co. admitted that they were after the bucks from the very start,
> but as ShorDurPerSav Bill Hicks would tell you (were he alive), when you
> sacrifice the integrity of your *message*, you sacrifice the integrity of
> your SOUL. If what I saw and heard was accurate, we may see the Church
> again, but with the "Bob" they warned us about in ARISE--a "nice Bob," one
> that isn't as scary as he once was.
Ohh no. When they sewed Legume's lips together to silence him, and he
walked off the stage and into the audience, fixing each individual he
passed with a look of extreme rage and
also-this-doesn't-hurt-me-cuz-i'm-holocaustal, if he brushed past you,
and you looked up and saw the big Dobbs face and reminded yourself
that this was happening because of his reception of the slack info,
you *KNEW* this wasn't the false, nice Bob. Ohh no.
-- Harvard Gash Knopfler
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Porky Pine" <porkypine@earthling.net>
Ringo Sartre <motorhead@radixKEANU.net> wrote in article
<6npciv$ode$1@news1.Radix.Net>...
> Jacques wrote:
[snip]
> Do everyone a favor and live up to your "Subject:" line.
>
> ~R
such viscous flame... yikes mr treatment mus' be smartin'.... well, do
give slack and if you would do ME a colossal personal favor, ~R,and live up
to your "name"....
~~~~N\|/~~~
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: nstewart@ican.net (Rev. Noah J. Stewart)
In article <6nqq8e$o2r$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>, terrygibson@rocketmail.com wrote:
> > The thing that disturbed me most about this weekend was how much it looked
> > like the Church was starting to SELL OUT to mass media. Admittedly, hell,
> > Stang and Co. admitted that they were after the bucks from the very start,
> > but as ShorDurPerSav Bill Hicks would tell you (were he alive), when you
> > sacrifice the integrity of your *message*, you sacrifice the integrity of
> > your SOUL. If what I saw and heard was accurate, we may see the Church
> > again, but with the "Bob" they warned us about in ARISE--a "nice Bob," one
> > that isn't as scary as he once was.
>
> Aw jeese, I'll bet Stang and the gang are real upset
> that you think they're "gettin way too
> commercial................ man";
Right. What do you want? ART?!?! Artiste I. Stang and his band of
improvisational dancers. "Hey, we're only in it to make YOU HAPPY. And
we don't need to eat or anything!" Yeah, all I know is that was a weekend
so full of slack that I am suffering serious withdrawl (enough that I'd
crawl back onto the internet after ignoring it for over a year). Stang
sell out? Good! As far as I'm concerned, I'll only be upset when I don't
get slack from it anymore, a day which I doubt will ever arrive.
Praise "Bob" and Praise Selling Out!
RevNoah
nstewart@ican.net
Original file name: My Last Posting to Alt.Slack
This file was converted with TextToHTML - (c) Logic n.v.