From: "Pope Phred" <phred523@home.com>
Newsgroups: alt.slack
Date: Wed, Jul 11, 2001 8:26 AM
Message-ID: <FBX27.127264$Q9.31272141@news1.elmhst1.il.home.com>
Geoff Bronner" <geoff.bronner@dartmouth.edu>
wrote in message
news:geoff.bronner-ya02408000R0907011505150001@news.dartmouth.edu...
>
> By the way.... pending an official report from
the sacred scribe... what
is
> the excuse this year?
In order to make my tab at the Sacred Sales Shack
an even $50, I
purchased Pamphlet #1. It had been years since I had
read this (I was
working as a security guard at the time) and I thought
that since I have had
years upon years of being exposed to the greater Mysteries,
I would be
better able to understand the verbiage contained in
said pamphlet.
I Was Wrong.
If anything, my lack of ignorance made the pamphlet
even MORE
incomprehensible! It was then that I came to the horrible
realization that
perhaps this is the type of communication we have been
sending the X-ists.
If so, we are doomed.
I remarked out loud, to myself: "Damn! This
is more confusing that VCR
instructions!"
Perhaps the X-ists timers have been stuck on the
blinking 12:00 all this
time! Perhaps they have only read as far as the Antaren
and Epsilonian
translations and haven't gotten around to the Earth
Translation. Or worse
yet, what if they collectively said: "Screw't"
and proceeded to wander off
to have lunch at the nearest Xist equivalent of Steak
& Shake, leaving us in
our over-written, verbose, Purgatory?
For the love of Dobbs, lets make it easy for these
guys, from now on, all
official Church communication must be in pictogram form,
or failing that,
Cuneiform.
Pope ("Hooked on Scatology" Worked for
Me!) Phred
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: Back from XXXX Day
From: geoff.bronner@dartmouth.edu (Geoff Bronner)
Newsgroups: alt.slack
Date: Wed, Jul 11, 2001 12:22 PM
Message-ID: <geoff.bronner-ya02408000R1107011222510001@news.dartmouth.edu>
In article <v3L27.124647$Q9.30777679@news1.elmhst1.il.home.com>,
"Pope
Phred" <phred523@home.com> wrote:
>
> For the love of Dobbs, lets make it easy for
these guys, from now on, all
>official Church communication must be in pictogram
form, or failing that,
>Cuneiform.
Isn't the top page on subsite basically one big pictograph?
If they can't
figure that out they must be REALLY dumb. Surely the
pleasure saucers have
T3 connections so they can look this up on the 'net.
-G
--
<http://www.dartmouth.edu/~geoffb/>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: Back from XXXX Day
From: "Pope Phred" <phred523@home.com>
Newsgroups: alt.slack
Date: Wed, Jul 11, 2001 9:28 PM
Message-ID: <r3737.128649$Q9.31683393@news1.elmhst1.il.home.com>
"Geoff Bronner" <geoff.bronner@dartmouth.edu>
wrote in message
news:geoff.bronner-ya02408000R1107011222510001@news.dartmouth.edu...
> In article <v3L27.124647$Q9.30777679@news1.elmhst1.il.home.com>,
"Pope
> Phred" <phred523@home.com> wrote:
> >
> > For the love of Dobbs, lets make it easy
for these guys, from now on,
all
> >official Church communication must be in pictogram
form, or failing that,
> >Cuneiform.
>
> Isn't the top page on subsite basically one big
pictograph? If they can't
> figure that out they must be REALLY dumb. Surely
the pleasure saucers have
> T3 connections so they can look this up on the
'net.
Just because they have better technology doesn't
make them smarter.
Perhaps the X-ists rely TOO much on their advanced warez
to decipher what
are relatively simple pictograms.
And we thought that was J.R. "Bob" Dobbs
Purpose: To be the mediator, to
close the deal, to exchange all of Earth's souls for
cheap Wampum. Clearly,
someone has been (dare I say it?) Slacking!
Pope (Big Mug 'O Java) Phred
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: Back from XXXX Day
From: Artemia Salina <y2k@sheayright.com>
Newsgroups: alt.slack
Date: Thu, Jul 12, 2001 3:05 AM
Message-ID: <3B4D4C3C.89370EA5@sheayright.com>
Sister Decadence wrote:
>
> On Wed, 11 Jul 2001 02:28:22 -0400, Artemia Salina
> <y2k@sheayright.com> wrote:
>
> >Geoff Bronner wrote:
> >> Anyway... I'm not fond of the whole 8661
thing so I'm looking for alternate
> >> theories I can steal and combine into
something all my own.
> >We didn't generate enough Hatred for the Xists to locate us.
> >And no one can say that I didn't try to do my part.
> >Another YEAR 'til the Xist ships make the loop
around
> >the Milky Way and within sensor range of us
again!
> If those fucking X-ists had shown, we'd NEVER
have had that much
> SLACK!
Well THAT'S more like it! But you're too late sister!
The moving
finger writes, and having writ moves on; nor all your
piety nor
Hatred shall lure it back to cancel half a line, nor
all your
tears wash out a word of it! I.e. you're FUCKED 'til
next year!
Have a NICE day!
--
Artemia Salina -- http://www.drpez.com/drali1.htm
Taking the 'rhetorical' out of 'rhetorical question'
since 1958
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News
=-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service
in the World!
-----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers!
=-----
Original file name: Re- Back from XXXX Day - converted on Wednesday, 18 July 2001, 06:24
This page was created using TextToHTML. TextToHTML is a free software for Macintosh and is (c) 1995,1996 by Kris Coppieters