Important you see this. [9/11 - Pentagon - Boeing 757]

Correspondent:: "Qwrk"
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 22:37:34 +0200

--------
http://www.elchulo.net/files/pentagon.swf

[Loading takes a while but heck, what's time ?]

Important you see this.




Correspondent:: Cardinal Vertigo
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 20:50:49 GMT

--------
Qwrk wrote:
> http://www.elchulo.net/files/pentagon.swf
>
> [Loading takes a while but heck, what's time ?]
>
> Important you see this.

Huh.

I don't have much to say right now about the content, but the
presentation itself is slick as snot. Worth the time to load and watch
for that reason alone.


Correspondent:: "fenian d'illudium q-36, Rlari."
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 20:09:26 -0400

--------
"Qwrk" wrote in message
news:41800782$0$92774$e4fe514c@dreader10.news.xs4all.nl...
> http://www.elchulo.net/files/pentagon.swf
>
> [Loading takes a while but heck, what's time ?]
>
> Important you see this.


That one continues to give me pause. It is compelling. Snopes refutes it
(http://www.snopes.com/rumors/pentagon.htm) and they do a reasonably good
job doing so, however....I still crinkle the tin foil hat in my pocket
nervously when I ponder that whole hunt the Boeing thing.




Correspondent:: polar bear
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 02:28:00 -0700

--------
In article , "fenian
d'illudium q-36, Rlari." wrote:

> "Qwrk" wrote in message
> news:41800782$0$92774$e4fe514c@dreader10.news.xs4all.nl...
> > http://www.elchulo.net/files/pentagon.swf
> >
> > [Loading takes a while but heck, what's time ?]
> >
> > Important you see this.
>
>
> That one continues to give me pause. It is compelling. Snopes refutes it
> (http://www.snopes.com/rumors/pentagon.htm) and they do a reasonably good
> job doing so, however....I still crinkle the tin foil hat in my pocket
> nervously when I ponder that whole hunt the Boeing thing.

Paws all over it, I'd say.

9-11 has spawned an entire industry of conspiracy theories and
counter-theories. When you look at the facts, you'd have to believe
it was intended that way, since it's next to impossible for anyone to
be THAT inept.

What I find curious is how everyone seems to have forgotten the
original 9-11 attack that took place in 1994:
http://geocities.com/roboplanes/cessna.html
Bear in mind that this was 6 months after the first WTC attack, and 6
years(!) after Mathias Rust landed the same type of aircraft in Red
Square, right next door to the Kremlin.
http://www.weht.net/WEHT/Mathias_Rust.html
He was handed 8 years for his efforts but only served 18 months.
What happened next is definitely tinfoil territory,
http://www.weht.net/WEHT/Mathias_Rust.html
although WHO's tinfoil isn't exactly clear.

pb