George W.Bush is the strongest character ever ! ! !
Correspondent:: chaos_israel@antisocial.com (The Rev. Dr. Lt. Chaos Israel)
Date: 24 Oct 2004 16:57:58 -0700
--------
"Sam Spade" wrote in message news:...
> A. Don't post off-topic messages.
Discussion of the "charcter sheet" of a public figure is NOT off-topic
in a universal roleplaying game group.
>
> B. Don't cross-post.
Don't tell me who I can and can't talk to.
>
> C. Don't troll.
If you believe a particular post is a "troll", DON'T REPLY.
>
> D. Learn netiquette.
Learn common sense.
--
C.
Correspondent:: "ghost" Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 00:12:43 GMT
--------
"The Rev. Dr. Lt. Chaos Israel" wrote in
message news:72e1e1e3.0410241557.772e5006@posting.google.com...
> "Sam Spade" wrote in message
news:...
>
> > A. Don't post off-topic messages.
>
> Discussion of the "charcter sheet" of a public figure is NOT off-topic
> in a universal roleplaying game group.
>
> >
> > B. Don't cross-post.
>
> Don't tell me who I can and can't talk to.
>
> >
> > C. Don't troll.
>
> If you believe a particular post is a "troll", DON'T REPLY.
>
> >
> > D. Learn netiquette.
>
> Learn common sense.
--------
In rec.games.frp.dnd The Rev. Dr. Lt. Chaos Israel wrote:
: "Sam Spade" wrote in message news:...
:> A. Don't post off-topic messages.
:
: Discussion of the "charcter sheet" of a public figure is NOT off-topic
: in a universal roleplaying game group.
It's NOT relevant here.
:> B. Don't cross-post.
:
: Don't tell me who I can and can't talk to.
Quit cross-posting, moron.
--
Two years ago, Iraq had one political party and no blogs. Now, thanks to America and our allies, it has a Pro-Democracy Party and two bloggers-turned-candidates. Meanwhile, America has a party that calls itself Democratic, even though most of its members would rather Iraq still be a dictatorship.
Correspondent:: chaos_israel@antisocial.com (The Rev. Dr. Lt. Chaos Israel)
Date: 26 Oct 2004 18:54:32 -0700
--------
weberm@polaris.net (Ubiquitous) wrote in message news:...
> In rec.games.frp.dnd The Rev. Dr. Lt. Chaos Israel wrote:
> : "Sam Spade" wrote in message news:...
> :> B. Don't cross-post.
> :
> : Don't tell me who I can and can't talk to.
>
> Quit cross-posting, moron.
--------
In rec.games.frp.dnd The Rev. Dr. Lt. Chaos Israel wrote:
: weberm@polaris.net (Ubiquitous) wrote in message news:...
:> Quit cross-posting, moron.
:
: Killfiled wituout further comment.
Here, have a peanut. Good boy.
*pats Rev Dr Lt Chaos Isreal on the head*
--
ISLAM: Winning the hearts and minds of the world, one bomb at a time.
Correspondent:: julian814@hotmail.com (Ralph Glatt)
Date: 27 Oct 2004 14:46:32 -0700
--------
weberm@polaris.net (Ubiquitous) wrote in message news:...
> In rec.games.frp.dnd The Rev. Dr. Lt. Chaos Israel wrote:
> : "Sam Spade" wrote in message news:...
>
> :> A. Don't post off-topic messages.
> :
> : Discussion of the "charcter sheet" of a public figure is NOT off-topic
> : in a universal roleplaying game group.
>
> It's NOT relevant here.
Sorry, Ubi, sometimes people forget you don't use services like Google
that show the whole thread. Someone named Peter gave D&D stats for
Bush, and ended his post with "Go d20!" So, that little piece was on
topic, at least.
Personally, though, I wish the election were over so people could shut
the f##k up about it. Unfortunately, looks like we'll be hearing about
it for a long time after.
Ralph Glatt
Correspondent:: "Eric B. Smith" Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 22:52:45 GMT
--------
Ralph Glatt wrote:
> Sorry, Ubi, sometimes people forget you don't use services like Google
> that show the whole thread. Someone named Peter gave D&D stats for
> Bush, and ended his post with "Go d20!" So, that little piece was on
> topic, at least.
No, it wasn't. At least, not in rec.games.frp.gurps which it is being cross
posted to (and I'm not sure about alt.slack - WTF is that newsgroup for?).
Watch your headers.
(Note, followup sent to oblivion, so if you're stupid enough to just hit
reply and let it fly I, and nobody else, will have to see it).
"The reason that there are so few women comics is that so few women
can bear being laughed at." - Anna Russell
Correspondent:: "ghost" Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 04:33:07 GMT
--------
"Eric B. Smith" wrote:
(snip)
> .... (and I'm not sure about alt.slack - WTF is that newsgroup for?).
It's for all the things that are good about America... like guns and
designer drugs.
It's for all those little buckshot holes in all those STOP signs everywhere.
It's for nekkid people who cuss and like sex.
It's for the secret government conspiracy that invents conspiracy theories.
It's for games that are played in a dark room, for infinite stakes, with an
infinite number of cards and a dealer who won't tell you the rules and who
smiles ALL THE TIME.
--------
In rec.games.frp.dnd Eric B. Smith wrote:
: Ralph Glatt wrote:
:> Sorry, Ubi, sometimes people forget you don't use services like Google
:> that show the whole thread. Someone named Peter gave D&D stats for
:> Bush, and ended his post with "Go d20!" So, that little piece was on
:> topic, at least.
:
: No, it wasn't. At least, not in rec.games.frp.gurps which it is being cross
: posted to (and I'm not sure about alt.slack - WTF is that newsgroup for?).
It involves that lame Church of the Subgenious nonsense from the 80's.
: Personally, though, I wish the election were over so people could shut
: the f##k up about it. Unfortunately, looks like we'll be hearing about
: it for a long time after.
I concur, but I get the feeling the Democrats are going to be trying to
steal the election again instead of gracefully losing. I'm sure we'll
be pining for the days of campaign ads soon enough.
--
ISLAM: Winning the hearts and minds of the world, one bomb at a time.
Correspondent:: Cardinal Vertigo Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 16:37:02 GMT
--------
Ubiquitous wrote:
> In rec.games.frp.dnd Ralph Glatt wrote:
>
> : Personally, though, I wish the election were over so people could shut
> : the f##k up about it. Unfortunately, looks like we'll be hearing about
> : it for a long time after.
>
> I concur, but I get the feeling the Democrats are going to be trying to
> steal the election again instead of gracefully losing. I'm sure we'll
> be pining for the days of campaign ads soon enough.
Person A: "I wish people would shut up about the election."
Person B: "Oh, I agree, and election election blah blah election."
--------
In rec.games.frp.dnd Cardinal Vertigo wrote:
: Ubiquitous wrote:
:> In rec.games.frp.dnd Ralph Glatt wrote:
:> : Personally, though, I wish the election were over so people could shut
:> : the f##k up about it. Unfortunately, looks like we'll be hearing about
:> : it for a long time after.
:>
:> I concur, but I get the feeling the Democrats are going to be trying to
:> steal the election again instead of gracefully losing. I'm sure we'll
:> be pining for the days of campaign ads soon enough.
:
: Person A: "I wish people would shut up about the election."
: Person B: "Oh, I agree, and election election blah blah election."
Umm, yeah.
Correspondent:: julian814@hotmail.com (Ralph Glatt)
Date: 29 Oct 2004 09:41:39 -0700
--------
weberm@polaris.net (Ubiquitous) wrote in message news:...
> In rec.games.frp.dnd Ralph Glatt wrote:
>
> : Personally, though, I wish the election were over so people could shut
> : the f##k up about it. Unfortunately, looks like we'll be hearing about
> : it for a long time after.
>
> I concur, but I get the feeling the Democrats are going to be trying to
> steal the election again instead of gracefully losing. I'm sure we'll
> be pining for the days of campaign ads soon enough.
This brings up the reason why I hate this election season. Each side
claims the other is lying and cheating to win. How is anyone supposed
to know who to trust? And you know that no matter who wins, there will
be an uproar from the other side, and it won't die down for another
year or so.
Personally, I wish everyone would vote for "None of the Above," so we
could find two other candidates, and have a CLEAN election.
--------
In article ,
Ralph Glatt wrote:
>weberm@polaris.net (Ubiquitous) wrote in message
>news:...
>> In rec.games.frp.dnd Ralph Glatt wrote:
>>
>> : Personally, though, I wish the election were over so people could shut
>> : the f##k up about it. Unfortunately, looks like we'll be hearing about
>> : it for a long time after.
>>
>> I concur, but I get the feeling the Democrats are going to be trying to
>> steal the election again instead of gracefully losing. I'm sure we'll
>> be pining for the days of campaign ads soon enough.
>
>This brings up the reason why I hate this election season. Each side
>claims the other is lying and cheating to win. How is anyone supposed
>to know who to trust? And you know that no matter who wins, there will
>be an uproar from the other side, and it won't die down for another
>year or so.
>
>Personally, I wish everyone would vote for "None of the Above," so we
>could find two other candidates, and have a CLEAN election.
Doesn't matter who you vote for, the Goverment gets elected.
--
Michael
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
NPC rights activist | Nameless Abominations are people too.
Correspondent:: HellPope Huey Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2004 04:42:14 GMT
--------
In article ,
mlush@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (Mr. M.J. Lush) wrote:
>>> Doesn't matter who you vote for, the Goverment gets elected.
SMARTEST THING ANYONE HAS SAID HERE IN A WEEK, more or less.
--
HellPope Huey
Douche or turd sandwich,
your vote still counts, maybe
America is the only country
that went from barbarism to decadence
without civilization in between.
- Oscar Wilde
"Oral sex should be an Olympic sport,
because its harder than curling
and if you're any good at it,
you deserve a medal."
- Lewis Black
Correspondent:: Ingo Siekmann Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 22:32:57 +0200
--------
Ralph Glatt schrieb:
-snip
> This brings up the reason why I hate this election season. Each side
> claims the other is lying and cheating to win. How is anyone supposed
> to know who to trust? And you know that no matter who wins, there will
> be an uproar from the other side, and it won't die down for another
> year or so.
I know a comic strip, where some folks asks the hero for his advice
which party to vote.
His response: "Imagine somebody serves you three plates with shit. Which
one would you eat?"
> Personally, I wish everyone would vote for "None of the Above," so we
> could find two other candidates, and have a CLEAN election.
Hehe, the new POTUS, a real candidate for the common people: Mr. Clean.
Bye
Ingo
PS: 2006 we Germans will elect our new gouverment. Then we can flood the
newsgroups with flamewars.
--------
In rec.games.frp.dnd Ralph Glatt wrote:
: weberm@polaris.net (Ubiquitous) wrote in message news:...
:> I concur, but I get the feeling the Democrats are going to be trying to
:> steal the election again instead of gracefully losing. I'm sure we'll
:> be pining for the days of campaign ads soon enough.
:
: This brings up the reason why I hate this election season. Each side
: claims the other is lying and cheating to win.
You can thank AlGore for that, Ralph.
: And you know that no matter who wins, there will be an uproar from the
: other side, and it won't die down for another year or so.
I think the only side that'll complain if they lose is the Democrats.
: Personally, I wish everyone would vote for "None of the Above," so we
: could find two other candidates, and have a CLEAN election.
Alas, 9-11 changed that.
--
ISLAM: Winning the hearts and minds of the world, one bomb at a time.
--------
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 22:20:36 +0000 (UTC), weberm@polaris.net
(Ubiquitous) wrote:
>In rec.games.frp.dnd Ralph Glatt wrote:
>: weberm@polaris.net (Ubiquitous) wrote in message news:...
>
>:> I concur, but I get the feeling the Democrats are going to be trying to
>:> steal the election again instead of gracefully losing. I'm sure we'll
>:> be pining for the days of campaign ads soon enough.
>:
>: This brings up the reason why I hate this election season. Each side
>: claims the other is lying and cheating to win.
>
>You can thank AlGore for that, Ralph.
>
>: And you know that no matter who wins, there will be an uproar from the
>: other side, and it won't die down for another year or so.
>
>I think the only side that'll complain if they lose is the Democrats.
>
Then you are an idiot.
Correspondent:: julian814@hotmail.com (Ralph Glatt)
Date: 30 Oct 2004 09:41:03 -0700
--------
rgormannospam@telusplanet.net (David Johnston) wrote in message news:<4182ba6f.140609245@news.telusplanet.net>...
> On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 22:20:36 +0000 (UTC), weberm@polaris.net
> (Ubiquitous) wrote:
>
> >In rec.games.frp.dnd Ralph Glatt wrote:
> >: weberm@polaris.net (Ubiquitous) wrote in message news:...
>
> >:> I concur, but I get the feeling the Democrats are going to be trying to
> >:> steal the election again instead of gracefully losing. I'm sure we'll
> >:> be pining for the days of campaign ads soon enough.
> >:
> >: This brings up the reason why I hate this election season. Each side
> >: claims the other is lying and cheating to win.
> >
> >You can thank AlGore for that, Ralph.
> >
> >: And you know that no matter who wins, there will be an uproar from the
> >: other side, and it won't die down for another year or so.
> >
> >I think the only side that'll complain if they lose is the Democrats.
> >
>
> Then you are an idiot.
Calling him names isn't going to change his mind. We'll just have to wait and see.
--------
On 30 Oct 2004 09:41:03 -0700, julian814@hotmail.com (Ralph Glatt)
wrote:
>> >I think the only side that'll complain if they lose is the Democrats.
>> >
>>
>> Then you are an idiot.
>
>Calling him names isn't going to change his mind.
Nothing will change his mind if he's stupid enough to think that the
Republicans won't complain about losing. Are they angels? Are they
saints?
Correspondent:: Ubiquitous Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2004 19:24:54 -0500
--------
In article <4183e3a5.216706910@news.telusplanet.net>,
rgormannospam@telusplanet.net says...
>On 30 Oct 2004 09:41:03 -0700, julian814@hotmail.com (Ralph Glatt)
>wrote:
>>> >I think the only side that'll complain if they lose is the Democrats.
>>>
>>> Then you are an idiot.
>>
>>Calling him names isn't going to change his mind.
>
>Nothing will change his mind if he's stupid enough to think that the
>Republicans won't complain about losing. Are they angels? Are they
>saints?
Of course not, but the Democrat have long been telegraphing that
they're going to try to win the election by any means possible,
including stealing it again. We all can thank Al Gore for that
charming new election tradition.
--
The DNC: Making every illegal vote count.
Correspondent:: "Malachias Invictus" Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2004 06:49:29 GMT
--------
"Ubiquitous" wrote in message
news:cm6kf8$dt6$2@news.utelfla.com...
> In article <4183e3a5.216706910@news.telusplanet.net>,
> rgormannospam@telusplanet.net says...
>>On 30 Oct 2004 09:41:03 -0700, julian814@hotmail.com (Ralph Glatt)
>>wrote:
>
>>>> >I think the only side that'll complain if they lose is the Democrats.
>>>>
>>>> Then you are an idiot.
>>>
>>>Calling him names isn't going to change his mind.
>>
>>Nothing will change his mind if he's stupid enough to think that the
>>Republicans won't complain about losing. Are they angels? Are they
>>saints?
>
> Of course not, but the Democrat have long been telegraphing that
> they're going to try to win the election by any means possible,
> including stealing it again.
You must be remembering the election from your home dimension, not this one.
> We all can thank Al Gore for that
> charming new election tradition.
Yeah, his buddies knocked qualified voters from the rolls in Florida, and
had the Supreme Court appoint him to office.
--
^v^v^Malachias Invictus^v^v^
It matters not how strait the gate,
How charged with punishment the scroll,
I am the Master of my fate:
I am the Captain of my soul.
--------
In rec.games.frp.dnd Malachias Invictus wrote:
: "Ubiquitous" wrote:
:> Of course not, but the Democrat have long been telegraphing that
:> they're going to try to win the election by any means possible,
:> including stealing it again.
:
: You must be remembering the election from your home dimension, not this one.
:
:> We all can thank Al Gore for that
:> charming new election tradition.
:
: Yeah, his buddies knocked qualified voters from the rolls in Florida, and
: had the Supreme Court appoint him to office.
Speaking of home dimensions, you need get in touch with reality.
AlGore lost, they recounted and he lost again, then sent the lawyers in
to steal the election via cherry-picking while systematically attempting
to get rid of the military ballots. The Supreme Court in a 7-2 ruling
called the Dems on it and told him to either recount ALL the votes in Florida
using the same non-subjective tallying method or submit the tallies.
You may thank me for setting you straight later.
Correspondent:: "Malachias Invictus" Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2004 16:05:21 GMT
--------
"Ubiquitous" wrote in message
news:cm84ev$7p6$1@news.utelfla.com...
> In rec.games.frp.dnd Malachias Invictus
> wrote:
> : "Ubiquitous" wrote:
>
> :> Of course not, but the Democrat have long been telegraphing that
> :> they're going to try to win the election by any means possible,
> :> including stealing it again.
> :
> : You must be remembering the election from your home dimension, not this
> one.
> :
> :> We all can thank Al Gore for that
> :> charming new election tradition.
> :
> : Yeah, his buddies knocked qualified voters from the rolls in Florida,
> and
> : had the Supreme Court appoint him to office.
>
> Speaking of home dimensions, you need get in touch with reality.
> AlGore lost, they recounted and he lost again, then sent the lawyers in
> to steal the election via cherry-picking while systematically attempting
> to get rid of the military ballots.
Are you saying that Bush's attorneys did not petition the Supreme Court to
halt recounts on December 8th, 2000? They did not claim Bush would suffer
"irreparable harm" as a result of the hand counts?
> The Supreme Court in a 7-2 ruling called the Dems on it and told him
> to either recount ALL the votes in Florida using the same non-subjective
> tallying method or submit the tallies.
You may want to take off your "only see evidence that supports my side"
glasses.
> You may thank me for setting you straight later.
Nonsense. I did not vote for *either* of those two fucks in 2000.
Personally, I think the Democrats in the Senate were a bunch of scumbag
cowards for not looking into the disenfranchisment that occurred in Florida.
By the way, you are a moron if you think *either* major party does not pull
every dirty trick they think they can get away with in order to get into
power.
--
^v^v^Malachias Invictus^v^v^
It matters not how strait the gate,
How charged with punishment the scroll,
I am the Master of my fate:
I am the Captain of my soul.
from _Invictus_, by William Ernest Henley
Correspondent:: Matt Frisch Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2004 10:52:49 GMT
--------
On Mon, 01 Nov 2004 19:24:54 -0500, Ubiquitous scribed
into the ether:
>In article <4183e3a5.216706910@news.telusplanet.net>,
>rgormannospam@telusplanet.net says...
>>On 30 Oct 2004 09:41:03 -0700, julian814@hotmail.com (Ralph Glatt)
>>wrote:
>
>>>> >I think the only side that'll complain if they lose is the Democrats.
>>>>
>>>> Then you are an idiot.
>>>
>>>Calling him names isn't going to change his mind.
>>
>>Nothing will change his mind if he's stupid enough to think that the
>>Republicans won't complain about losing. Are they angels? Are they
>>saints?
>
>Of course not, but the Democrat have long been telegraphing that
>they're going to try to win the election by any means possible,
>including stealing it again.
How exactly does one "steal" something by not possessing it?
--------
On Mon, 01 Nov 2004 19:24:54 -0500, Ubiquitous
wrote:
>In article <4183e3a5.216706910@news.telusplanet.net>,
>rgormannospam@telusplanet.net says...
>>On 30 Oct 2004 09:41:03 -0700, julian814@hotmail.com (Ralph Glatt)
>>wrote:
>
>>>> >I think the only side that'll complain if they lose is the Democrats.
>>>>
>>>> Then you are an idiot.
>>>
>>>Calling him names isn't going to change his mind.
>>
>>Nothing will change his mind if he's stupid enough to think that the
>>Republicans won't complain about losing. Are they angels? Are they
>>saints?
>
>Of course not, but the Democrat have long been telegraphing that
>they're going to try to win the election by any means possible,
>including stealing it again.
Both the Democrats and the Republicans have plans for a court
challenge in the event of a close contest. They are no different from
each other.
Correspondent:: "Malachias Invictus" Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2004 17:19:50 GMT
--------
"David Johnston" wrote in message
news:4187ad60.1145349@news.telusplanet.net...
> On Mon, 01 Nov 2004 19:24:54 -0500, Ubiquitous
> wrote:
>
>>In article <4183e3a5.216706910@news.telusplanet.net>,
>>rgormannospam@telusplanet.net says...
>>>On 30 Oct 2004 09:41:03 -0700, julian814@hotmail.com (Ralph Glatt)
>>>wrote:
>>
>>>>> >I think the only side that'll complain if they lose is the Democrats.
>>>>>
>>>>> Then you are an idiot.
>>>>
>>>>Calling him names isn't going to change his mind.
>>>
>>>Nothing will change his mind if he's stupid enough to think that the
>>>Republicans won't complain about losing. Are they angels? Are they
>>>saints?
>>
>>Of course not, but the Democrat have long been telegraphing that
>>they're going to try to win the election by any means possible,
>>including stealing it again.
>
> Both the Democrats and the Republicans have plans for a court
> challenge in the event of a close contest. They are no different from
> each other.
...and in more ways than just that.
--
^v^v^Malachias Invictus^v^v^
It matters not how strait the gate,
How charged with punishment the scroll,
I am the Master of my fate:
I am the Captain of my soul.
from _Invictus_, by William Ernest Henley
Correspondent:: klassen@rowan.edu (David Klassen)
Date: 2 Nov 2004 09:38:06 -0800
--------
Ubiquitous wrote in message news:...
> In article <4183e3a5.216706910@news.telusplanet.net>,
> rgormannospam@telusplanet.net says...
> >On 30 Oct 2004 09:41:03 -0700, julian814@hotmail.com (Ralph Glatt)
> >wrote:
>
> >>> >I think the only side that'll complain if they lose is the Democrats.
> >>>
> >>> Then you are an idiot.
> >>
> >>Calling him names isn't going to change his mind.
> >
> >Nothing will change his mind if he's stupid enough to think that the
> >Republicans won't complain about losing. Are they angels? Are they
> >saints?
>
> Of course not, but the Democrat have long been telegraphing that
> they're going to try to win the election by any means possible,
> including stealing it again. We all can thank Al Gore for that
> charming new election tradition.
This is either the most ironic statement I've ever read, or the
most ignorantly stupid statement I've ever read. The facts are:
Black voters (traditionally D) were purged/turned away from polls.
Kathryn Harris et al. went in and "fixed" ballots absentee ballots
received from military folk (traditionally R) so they would get counted.
George Bush and the RNC, you know, those big States' Righters and
proponents of smaller federal involvement, were then ones who
brought suit to the *Federal* Supreme Court when it is clear by
the Constitution that voting is under the jurisdiction of the State
and it's Supreme Court.
Correspondent:: "Malachias Invictus" Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2004 19:19:49 GMT
--------
"David Klassen" wrote in message
news:f1ad8778.0411020938.62455a2d@posting.google.com...
> George Bush and the RNC, you know, those big States' Righters and
> proponents of smaller federal involvement, were then ones who
> brought suit to the *Federal* Supreme Court when it is clear by
> the Constitution that voting is under the jurisdiction of the State
> and it's Supreme Court.
Here is another, interesting "empowerment of the people" from the White
House:
It matters not how strait the gate,
How charged with punishment the scroll,
I am the Master of my fate:
I am the Captain of my soul.
from _Invictus_, by William Ernest Henley
Correspondent:: Ubiquitous Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2004 19:22:13 -0500
--------
In article <4182ba6f.140609245@news.telusplanet.net>, rgormannospam@telusplanet.net
says...
>On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 22:20:36 +0000 (UTC), weberm@polaris.net (Ubiquitous) wrote:
>>In rec.games.frp.dnd Ralph Glatt wrote:
>>: weberm@polaris.net (Ubiquitous) wrote:
>>You can thank AlGore for that, Ralph.
>>
>>: And you know that no matter who wins, there will be an uproar from the
>>: other side, and it won't die down for another year or so.
>>
>>I think the only side that'll complain if they lose is the Democrats.
>
>Then you are an idiot.
Takes one to know one.
Correspondent:: amil112001@yahoo.com (John Hamil)
Date: 30 Oct 2004 01:27:47 -0700
--------
weberm@polaris.net (Ubiquitous) wrote in message news:...
> In rec.games.frp.dnd Ralph Glatt wrote:
> : weberm@polaris.net (Ubiquitous) wrote in message news:...
>
> :> I concur, but I get the feeling the Democrats are going to be trying to
> :> steal the election again instead of gracefully losing. I'm sure we'll
> :> be pining for the days of campaign ads soon enough.
> :
> : This brings up the reason why I hate this election season. Each side
> : claims the other is lying and cheating to win.
>
> You can thank AlGore for that, Ralph.
>
> : And you know that no matter who wins, there will be an uproar from the
> : other side, and it won't die down for another year or so.
>
> I think the only side that'll complain if they lose is the Democrats.
>
> : Personally, I wish everyone would vote for "None of the Above," so we
> : could find two other candidates, and have a CLEAN election.
>
> Alas, 9-11 changed that.
What does that last sentence mean? It seems so off the wall.
Correspondent:: "Malachias Invictus" Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2004 17:15:12 GMT
--------
"John Hamil" wrote in message
news:e86b3b01.0410300027.56e076d1@posting.google.com...
> weberm@polaris.net (Ubiquitous) wrote in message
> news:...
>> In rec.games.frp.dnd Ralph Glatt wrote:
>> : weberm@polaris.net (Ubiquitous) wrote in message
>> news:...
>>
>> :> I concur, but I get the feeling the Democrats are going to be trying
>> to
>> :> steal the election again instead of gracefully losing. I'm sure we'll
>> :> be pining for the days of campaign ads soon enough.
>> :
>> : This brings up the reason why I hate this election season. Each side
>> : claims the other is lying and cheating to win.
>>
>> You can thank AlGore for that, Ralph.
>>
>> : And you know that no matter who wins, there will be an uproar from the
>> : other side, and it won't die down for another year or so.
>>
>> I think the only side that'll complain if they lose is the Democrats.
>>
>> : Personally, I wish everyone would vote for "None of the Above," so we
>> : could find two other candidates, and have a CLEAN election.
>>
>> Alas, 9-11 changed that.
>
> What does that last sentence mean? It seems so off the wall.
John, meet Ubiquitous.
--
^v^v^Malachias Invictus^v^v^
It matters not how strait the gate,
How charged with punishment the scroll,
I am the Master of my fate:
I am the Captain of my soul.
from _Invictus_, by William Ernest Henley
Correspondent:: Ubiquitous Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2004 19:27:46 -0500
--------
In article , amil112001@yahoo.com says...
>weberm@polaris.net (Ubiquitous) wrote in message
>> In rec.games.frp.dnd Ralph Glatt wrote:
>> : Personally, I wish everyone would vote for "None of the Above," so we
>> : could find two other candidates, and have a CLEAN election.
>>
>> Alas, 9-11 changed that.
>
> What does that last sentence mean? It seems so off the wall.
What don't you understand? We're in a war now.
Correspondent:: "Malachias Invictus" Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2004 03:41:05 GMT
--------
"Ubiquitous" wrote in message
news:cm6kkk$dt6$3@news.utelfla.com...
> In article ,
> amil112001@yahoo.com says...
>>weberm@polaris.net (Ubiquitous) wrote in message
>>> In rec.games.frp.dnd Ralph Glatt wrote:
>
>>> : Personally, I wish everyone would vote for "None of the Above," so we
>>> : could find two other candidates, and have a CLEAN election.
>>>
>>> Alas, 9-11 changed that.
>>
>> What does that last sentence mean? It seems so off the wall.
>
> What don't you understand? We're in a war now.
Yes. The same one described in 1984.
--
^v^v^Malachias Invictus^v^v^
It matters not how strait the gate,
How charged with punishment the scroll,
I am the Master of my fate:
I am the Captain of my soul.
from _Invictus_, by William Ernest Henley
Correspondent:: Michael Cule Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2004 18:20:54 +0000
--------
In message , Ubiquitous
writes
>What don't you understand? We're in a war now.
Indeed? With which nation? And when did the Senate pass the resolution
required by your Constitution?
--
Michael Cule
Correspondent:: raven@westnet.poe.com
Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2004 21:03:56 GMT
--------
In rec.games.frp.gurps Michael Cule wrote:
> In message , Ubiquitous
> writes
> >What don't you understand? We're in a war now.
> Indeed?
Well, yes, tho I'd prefer you took the inquiry to some approriate group.
> With which nation?
Those people/groups that the presdient feels were responsible for 9/11 and
any nation that offers them support or safe harbor, and with Iraq.
> And when did the Senate pass the resolution required by your
> Constitution?
On Septmber 18th, 2001 the president signed Senate Joint Resolution 23
and
On October 16, 2002, public law 107-243 "Authorization for Use of Military
Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002" which in some ways was redundant
to the previous resolution.
None of this the slightest to do with GURPS tho.
John
--
Remove the dead poet to e-mail, tho CC'd posts are unwelcome.
Ask me about joining the NRA.
I voted already. Leave me the #&^%* alone
Correspondent:: Michael Cule Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2004 21:27:02 +0000
--------
In message <0DShd.3334$Fg2.1381390@newshog.newsread.com>,
raven@westnet.poe.com writes
>On Septmber 18th, 2001 the president signed Senate Joint Resolution 23
Hmmm, fascinating. A political blank cheque. Authorising indefinite use
of force, public resources and lives against a target or targets yet to
be determined. At least when they declared war on Germany and Japan they
named the targets.
--
Michael Cule
--------
On Mon, 01 Nov 2004 19:27:46 -0500, Ubiquitous
wrote:
>In article , amil112001@yahoo.com says...
>>weberm@polaris.net (Ubiquitous) wrote in message
>>> In rec.games.frp.dnd Ralph Glatt wrote:
>
>>> : Personally, I wish everyone would vote for "None of the Above," so we
>>> : could find two other candidates, and have a CLEAN election.
>>>
>>> Alas, 9-11 changed that.
>>
>> What does that last sentence mean? It seems so off the wall.
>
>What don't you understand? We're in a war now.
With whom?
Correspondent:: "Malachias Invictus" Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2004 19:20:56 GMT
--------
"David Johnston" wrote in message
news:4187cc30.9034903@news.telusplanet.net...
> On Mon, 01 Nov 2004 19:27:46 -0500, Ubiquitous
> wrote:
>
>>In article ,
>>amil112001@yahoo.com says...
>>>weberm@polaris.net (Ubiquitous) wrote in message
>>>> In rec.games.frp.dnd Ralph Glatt wrote:
>>
>>>> : Personally, I wish everyone would vote for "None of the Above," so we
>>>> : could find two other candidates, and have a CLEAN election.
>>>>
>>>> Alas, 9-11 changed that.
>>>
>>> What does that last sentence mean? It seems so off the wall.
>>
>>What don't you understand? We're in a war now.
>
> With whom?
A noun.
--
^v^v^Malachias Invictus^v^v^
It matters not how strait the gate,
How charged with punishment the scroll,
I am the Master of my fate:
I am the Captain of my soul.
from _Invictus_, by William Ernest Henley
Correspondent:: Michael Cule Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2004 21:20:25 +0000
--------
In message , Malachias Invictus
writes
>>>What don't you understand? We're in a war now.
>>
>> With whom?
>
>A noun.
And not a proper one...
--
Michael Cule
Correspondent:: "Malachias Invictus" Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2004 23:11:55 GMT
--------
"Michael Cule" wrote in message
news:4lGXk4EZo$hBFwD+@room3b.demon.co.uk...
> In message , Malachias Invictus
> writes
>>>>What don't you understand? We're in a war now.
>>>
>>> With whom?
>>
>>A noun.
>
> And not a proper one...
Indeed.
--
^v^v^Malachias Invictus^v^v^
It matters not how strait the gate,
How charged with punishment the scroll,
I am the Master of my fate:
I am the Captain of my soul.
from _Invictus_, by William Ernest Henley
Correspondent:: mongloid2002@yahoo.com (John Hamil)
Date: 2 Nov 2004 20:09:43 -0800
--------
Ubiquitous wrote in message news:...
> In article , amil112001@yahoo.com says...
> >weberm@polaris.net (Ubiquitous) wrote in message
> >> In rec.games.frp.dnd Ralph Glatt wrote:
>
> >> : Personally, I wish everyone would vote for "None of the Above," so we
> >> : could find two other candidates, and have a CLEAN election.
> >>
> >> Alas, 9-11 changed that.
> >
> > What does that last sentence mean? It seems so off the wall.
>
> What don't you understand? We're in a war now.
Are you saying we have to vote for one of the two party
candidates while we are at war, but other times we could find two new
ones? Why is that?
Correspondent:: "Malachias Invictus" Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2004 17:14:41 GMT
--------
"Ubiquitous" wrote in message
news:clufnk$jlq$2@news.utelfla.com...
> In rec.games.frp.dnd Ralph Glatt wrote:
> : weberm@polaris.net (Ubiquitous) wrote in message
> news:...
>
> :> I concur, but I get the feeling the Democrats are going to be trying to
> :> steal the election again instead of gracefully losing. I'm sure we'll
> :> be pining for the days of campaign ads soon enough.
> :
> : This brings up the reason why I hate this election season. Each side
> : claims the other is lying and cheating to win.
>
> You can thank AlGore for that, Ralph.
...as well as Dubya & cronies.
> : And you know that no matter who wins, there will be an uproar from the
> : other side, and it won't die down for another year or so.
>
> I think the only side that'll complain if they lose is the Democrats.
That is pure horseshit.
> : Personally, I wish everyone would vote for "None of the Above," so we
> : could find two other candidates, and have a CLEAN election.
>
> Alas, 9-11 changed that.
Not at all. They were never clean.
--
^v^v^Malachias Invictus^v^v^
It matters not how strait the gate,
How charged with punishment the scroll,
I am the Master of my fate:
I am the Captain of my soul.
from _Invictus_, by William Ernest Henley
Correspondent:: "Malachias Invictus" Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2004 17:13:01 GMT
--------
"Ralph Glatt" wrote in message
news:ce9c44dd.0410290841.6b8aa8c0@posting.google.com...
> weberm@polaris.net (Ubiquitous) wrote in message
> news:...
>> In rec.games.frp.dnd Ralph Glatt wrote:
>>
>> : Personally, though, I wish the election were over so people could shut
>> : the f##k up about it. Unfortunately, looks like we'll be hearing about
>> : it for a long time after.
>>
>> I concur, but I get the feeling the Democrats are going to be trying to
>> steal the election again instead of gracefully losing. I'm sure we'll
>> be pining for the days of campaign ads soon enough.
>
> This brings up the reason why I hate this election season. Each side
> claims the other is lying and cheating to win. How is anyone supposed
> to know who to trust?
That is easy: don't trust *either* of the bastards. Both sides are willing
to lie and cheat to win.
> And you know that no matter who wins, there will
> be an uproar from the other side, and it won't die down for another
> year or so.
Indeed.
> Personally, I wish everyone would vote for "None of the Above," so we
> could find two other candidates, and have a CLEAN election.
I just wish we could get another viable party.
--
^v^v^Malachias Invictus^v^v^
It matters not how strait the gate,
How charged with punishment the scroll,
I am the Master of my fate:
I am the Captain of my soul.
from _Invictus_, by William Ernest Henley
Correspondent:: König Prüß, GfbAEV
Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2004 17:23:58 GMT
--------
Malachias Invictus wrote:
> "Ralph Glatt" wrote in message
> news:ce9c44dd.0410290841.6b8aa8c0@posting.google.com...
> > weberm@polaris.net (Ubiquitous) wrote in message
> > news:...
> >> In rec.games.frp.dnd Ralph Glatt wrote:
> >>
> >> : Personally, though, I wish the election were over so people could shut
> >> : the f##k up about it. Unfortunately, looks like we'll be hearing about
> >> : it for a long time after.
> >>
> >> I concur, but I get the feeling the Democrats are going to be trying to
> >> steal the election again instead of gracefully losing. I'm sure we'll
> >> be pining for the days of campaign ads soon enough.
> >
> > This brings up the reason why I hate this election season. Each side
> > claims the other is lying and cheating to win. How is anyone supposed
> > to know who to trust?
>
> That is easy: don't trust *either* of the bastards. Both sides are willing
> to lie and cheat to win.
>
> > And you know that no matter who wins, there will
> > be an uproar from the other side, and it won't die down for another
> > year or so.
>
> Indeed.
>
> > Personally, I wish everyone would vote for "None of the Above," so we
> > could find two other candidates, and have a CLEAN election.
>
> I just wish we could get another viable party.
>
> --
> ^v^v^Malachias Invictus^v^v^
>
> It matters not how strait the gate,
> How charged with punishment the scroll,
> I am the Master of my fate:
> I am the Captain of my soul.
>
> from _Invictus_, by William Ernest Henley
Send $10 to:
The Viable Party
Del Rio, Texas
"Just another po' bucka wino one a bus ride!"
Correspondent:: Timberwolf Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 22:59:42 +0100
--------
Ralph Glatt, lle n'vanima ar' lle atara lanneina!
> This brings up the reason why I hate this election season. Each side
> claims the other is lying and cheating to win. How is anyone supposed
> to know who to trust? And you know that no matter who wins, there will
> be an uproar from the other side, and it won't die down for another
> year or so.
>
> Personally, I wish everyone would vote for "None of the Above," so we
> could find two other candidates, and have a CLEAN election.
eww.. i'm kind a familiar with that topic..
have an expirience as OSCE election observer ;)
it goes like this.. "trust none, vote for lesser evil"