somebody summarize
Correspondent:: elvis_bond@hotmail.com (Howard Hughes)
Date: 23 Nov 2004 05:42:48 -0800
--------
*The thing is, I wonder how I got on this elite list of recipients*
could someone read this and post a summary? I'm too busy.
From: "Barabbas nee Daniel M Coats"
To: panicboredom@antimedia.net,
support@primus.ca,SpartacusVsDEAmonEmpire@WashingtonDC.usa.com,
gabriell@vicnet.net.au,camilleb@vthc.org.au, reclaim040@yahoo.com.au,
jramos@swin.edu.au,acc&c@csu.edu.au, pssaynowar@yahoo.com.au,
career.jude@effect.net.au,canberra@greenleft.org.au,
elvis_bond@hotmail.com,bamberg@eaglet.rain.com, gigi_geyer@juno.com
CC:
halifax@canwestinteractive.com,globalbc.newstips@pacpress.southam.ca,vanservice@canwestinteractive.com,
gomagazine@chtv.ca,Victoriainfo@canwestinteractive.com,vancouverinfo@canwestinteractive.com,
tips@chtv.ca,bowes@bowesnet.com, info@awna.com,
anarcon@lists.cat.org.au,feag0001@flinders.edu.au, AdayIn7@yahoo.com
Subject: Barabbas rough draft description of corruption syndicate
November 22 2004
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Originating-IP: 216.166.202.217
Received: from webmail-outgoing.us4.outblaze.com ([205.158.62.67]) by
mc12-f12.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6824); Mon, 22
Nov
2004 10:00:26 -0800
Received: from replies.hq.outblaze.com (mailalert4.us4.outblaze.com
[205.158.62.144])by webmail-outgoing.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with
SMTP
id 0AABD180037Afor ; Mon, 22 Nov 2004 18:00:26
+0000 (GMT)
Received: (qmail 20170 invoked by uid 1003); 22 Nov 2004 18:00:22
-0000
Received: (qmail 3554 invoked by uid 0); 22 Nov 2004 17:47:35 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO wfilter.us4.outblaze.com)
(205.158.62.180) by
replies.hq.outblaze.com with SMTP; 22 Nov 2004 17:47:35 -0000
Received: by ws3-2.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix, from userid 1001)id
614C7CA0A9; Mon, 22 Nov 2004 17:47:30 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [216.166.202.217] by ws3-2.us4.outblaze.com with http
for
spartacusvsdeamonempire@washingtondc.usa.com; Mon, 22 Nov 2004
11:47:23
-0600
X-Message-Info: JGTYoYF78jEHjJx36Oi8+YDSEg8qKPPD
X-OB-Received: from unknown (205.158.62.92) by
wfilter.us4.outblaze.com;
22 Nov 2004 17:47:30 -0000
X-Originating-Server: ws3-2.us4.outblaze.com
Return-Path: spartacusvsdeamonempire@washingtondc.usa.com
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Nov 2004 18:00:27.0020 (UTC)
FILETIME=[2586BCC0:01C4D0BD]
Titled in MSDOS: "16pgEDIT"
Titled in MSWord: "The 16 page description of a corruption syndicate
and
the 14 page description of its criminal origins~"
11/22/04 10:39:33 AM To: <
end
after 14 page description of the crime ring>>
To whom: I apologoze for so many rough drafts prior to completed doc.
Times are sensitive and some additions will only be helpful for a
short
time. Therefore some must be withheld and this doc will not make
sense as
a whole, until the final parts are included.
Thank you for allowing me to send this to you,
Dan
It is possible that I have successfully thwarted enough varied
attempts to
take me into custody without allowing me the right to defend myself,
that I
might have the right to bring the 14 page description of the crime
ring
into my defense, no matter what else occurs.
Unless I am incoherent. And this has been warned to me.
And if that were true, it would explain what seemed to occur at
the
Walmart a few days ago. That attempt was a near miss and I still
marvel at
the terrible ordeal taht was apparently waiting for me if I did not
ahve
time to respond in some way that made the strongman who would be
replaced
eventually with a simpleton look alike, seem to be doing what he was
doing.
But since witnesses had been placed nearby for more than just
observation, but also for the pretense of coming to the rescue of the
simpleton, so that they could testify about my attempts to prevent
their
help. They were apparently trained and had practiced this wrestling
match
scene for cameras for long enough that I might not have had a chance.
They
might have been surprised at what I could do, but on the other hand,
they
might have been training for any case taht I would have known. And if
enough numbers had been quick enough to act, my hesitation in
rendering the
muscular gripper unconcious so that I could turn on the "rescuers"
might
have overpowered me. And their knowing ahead of time where the
cameras
were placed, plus thte potential for digital editing and body doubles
which
have been reported before, make me grateful that I did not shake the
muscle
man's hand.
I will meet him again however, in a courtroom, if I have my way.
And
as the scales have apparently tipped a bit- not in my direction but
since
to the detriment of deception, tipped to my benefit- this courtroom
meeting
might occur.
11/21/04 6:13 PM I should mention that today I had an enjoyable
dinner at
my Dad's girlfriend's house. I had been warned about certain threats
which
I intended to thwart by sending an email to some ministers of Christ
and a
few laic members of a brotherhood that I joined more than a year ago,
named
"Way of Christ." And there was either not a threat at all and the
warnings
were intended to cause me to react, or my emails worked once again.
For
various reasons which I will discuss I beleive that there was a threat
but
that my emails might have been nearly unnecessary anyway. I had been
withholding certain bits of information until the past couple of days,
for
their usefulness potential. And by revealing them I might have caused
some
complications to what was planned.
But the day is not over yet. It is still possible that marijuana
will
be found at my Dad's girlfriend, or that something will have been
stolen
from her and sold to people who will identify me as the seller, acting
in a
confused, hostile, or bizarrely outrageous manner and demanding cash
payment while laughing about my cheating at the Illinois Department of
Revenue and the federal IRS...I have added these final two
possibilities in
a sarcastic sense only, although I have seen the most deceptive,
unfair
contradictions to anything that I had ever imagined in police
corruption,
so I now have littel doubt that shenanigans occur and that those
individuals who are especially good at subverting the truth, so that
their
shenanigans are more successful, are admired among some of their
coworkers.
My Dad's girlfriend's son invited me to a Jew hater meeting and he
attempted to put cards into my hands which had something to do with
them.
When I tried to be polite and refuse he persisted and told me that it
was a
Christian group. I replied that Hitler was supposedly Christian and
he
stood there with the cards inches from my hands apparently not knowing
quite what to do with them. I did not take them but my Dad had been
asking
questions about the meetings and since Dad also began to read books
about
conspriracy theories and prophets who predict Wall Street futures from
Biblical passages, I reconsidered my belief that a few months ago when
I
was warned that I would be accused of having a personality which
believed
in this trash, that because I had made express statements about their
illogic, the attempt would end.
If I am not coherent to defend myself, it will not matter to the
crime
ring what I said before because with the multiple personality any of
this
can be explained as simply being from a personality that I do not
remember.
I will discuss matters in a few pages such as dancing mania, speaking
in
tongues, and hypnosis, all of which I believe the participants might
believe but all of which I have doubts of having any valid basis any
more
than witches, goblins, and alien abductions (this last of which would
be
the only possible exception but until evidence arrives, I will not
believe
the aliens have arrived)
But again, if official labeling can paint me as a multiple
personality,
my logic can be painted into one of the corners and this woman's son's
illogic can be given the paint brush by those officials, while he
writes
Judah or Scientologist or neoNazi or Mormon or Catholic or Baptist
hegemonists all over my face and have a cheering crowd behind him
while he
does it, all with tin stars to brag to each other that they are the
law
so...
I am learning that the legal system is based on justice tilted
toward
the rules in the legal system. Others surely knew this before me, and
its
not that I did not know it, but I think that a change has occurred in
recent years which makes teh system based in deception so much as to
be at
times grossly illegal. Those who know the rules and have the power to
do
so, can commit actions or motions in law or out, which will have a
different result than other people who commit similar actions but do
not
know the legal rules. And I am understating the situation.
I have seen judges who have played the role of honorable court,
while
knowing full well that the end result in the adversarial process was
prepared for in advance, by staging the steps and preparing legal
maneuvers
to fit taht staging. People are being dupred and noncriminals are
being
convicted in large numbers. And the judges are sometimes acceptable
to
this, because they have littel choice but to follow precedent, and
they
might not like that restriction in some cases. So if some innocents
are
convicted but their capabiities as judges are broadened, sometimes by
interactions with the "police" who are trained to stage the steps so
that
the prosecutor can maneuver legally in the preferred mehtods. This
might
be compared to the old "good old boy system" because debts are accrued
and
repaid between the players.
If I sound disrespectful I apologize. I am surprised myself and
what
will follow might show my surprise. Becasue the judges are the decent
part
of the system. The police who excel in the present system are the
members
of an organization whcih has been described in the 14 pages at the end
of
this document. Pages 3-12 are most specific and the other pages are
explained in discussions there so I will not elaborate.
Some officials are making money and some are making a lot of money,
but
most are being admired or complimented or feared or respected, by the
ones
who are making the money. So it is not difficult to know where their
motivations are leaning.
And I feel like the last man, alone in an arena, too weak to battle
anything that could be presented, but having accomplished certain
guidelies
which limit the type of battle.
On my side is the unwillingness of the crime ring to lose the
battle so
that they do not attempt anything that can be shown after the
skirmishing
is over. Their ammunition has been hampered by a 14 page description
of
their criminal origins and their capabilities of causing me to
disappear or
be murdered are diminished by teh interest in that 14 pages which
might
occur.
If however, a persuasive orchestration can be presented where I have
lost my mind and cannot respond, or if I do respond it is in terms
that can
be monitored and released only based on the outcome that is desired by
the
crime ring, I am doomed. And the skeptical public is generally
unaware
that software makes the surveillance systems so effective that they
are
known today, and can be monitored closely for their reactions,
entrapped
into crmies which have already been arranged and which will seem ot
ahve no
relationship to my attempts to brign the truth about the crime ring
into
the awareness of the voting public.
At any time that doubts arise that more can be reduced by what will be
reported later that might affect the outcome so that it has more
truth:
Edit/Find: "11/22/04 6:52:21 AM I feel like"
Find: 11/22/04 8:09:08 AM for a
NOTE to my honored father:
I have walked a metaphorical tightrope between defending myself
against
skilled deceivers and their capabilities due to their offices, the
possibility that my reactions to the deceptions could be used as
evidence
that I was imagining them, which would have resulted in my being
misdiagnosed with a mental disorder- now I am aware that the disorder
of
choice is a multiple personality- so that my testimony against the
officials who were invested into the money laundering operation which
I
reported to the IRS, would be compromised.
How I survived a path of what seemed impossible odds, can be
explained
by a mixture of support from those who preferred that I did survive
enough
to risk their own freedom, and my training about how to use that
support in
the most effective manner, and the grace of God. I prayed so
frequently
that I had concerns at times that if the surveillance was detecting it
and
there finally was achieved enough deceptive evidence to take me into
custody in the limited way that was needed so that my evidence would
not be
admissible for my defense, that my prayers would be used as evidence
that I
was exhibiting symptoms of whatever mental disorders might be known to
inlcude prayers. There are some so do not doubt the possibility. But
I
was aware that if it were recorded as such, there might be interest by
investigative reporters subsequent to the hearings, and that
possiblity
would likely prevent it. When I learned that I might be accused of
being a
terrorist (in one of my personalities), so that national security
concerns
might restrict the release of some evidence, I once again considered
the
possiblity htat I might be portrayed as a religious fanatic (in one of
my
personalities), so that my praying could be used against me. And I
might
add that there is a string of arrestees in my wake, who now fearfully
cooperate with this corrupt group of officials who are memberfs of the
crime ring which is described in the final 14 pages of this document,
and
probably in court documents in Carroll County Illinois as case
2004-L-7.
(Just the fact that I need to use the modifier "probably filed" should
indicate the level of deception to which I have been subjected. I
have
written a number of arguments for why implausible actions might be
used in
the attempts to stop me from exposing the crime ring that is desribed
in
those final 14 pages of this document.)
And the alleged fact that those 14 pages halted a frame-up in which
officials working inside the Illinois Department of Revenue were
assisting,
should also show the level of deception to which I have been
subjected.
The certainty that I would be arrested soon after the April 20, 2004
deadline for filing sales tax income, was sufficient for other
mistakes to
be made by the crime ring. Those additional mistakes were made
partially
accessible by my last minute writing of the 14 page description. And
as I
attempted to do this subsequently I was able to accumulate some
control
over the situation, at least if "control" can be used in this context.
If
I am too successful too early, I will die of some plausible method,
but if
I am capable of stringing these criminals along with their hopes of
succeeding in their initial belief that, like others who have been
silenced
before me, no trace will be left to show that criminal deception was
used.
The following pages begin with a discussion about the human
tendency to
believe what they want to believe, so thoroughly as to become involved
in
quasi-implausible acts. I did not include "speaking in tongues"
because I
do not want to offend religions which believe that this is a real and
divine gift. But I will state here that I have read into it and it
seems
to be doubtful that it is anything more than wishful antics by the
exhibitionism in us all.
<
was
informed is the ring leader and who rebounded from a disgraced
official to
become a drug lord. The possibilities that this report could have
been
false and intentionally placed so as to make me seem to still be
living in
some Vietnam War delusion, make me need to see the evidence. But the
positioning of this ex official in experiences that would have allowed
him
to obtain this crime ring infiltration into government, make me want
to see
the evidence, too.
And if it were this Henry, his needs to remain anonymous so that he
could emerge as the savior after terrorists had caused enough fear and
chaos so that martial law would be declared, are evident. And only if
he
were completely unexpected could he quickly and efficiently use his
own
company to get matters under control and be recognized for the messiah
that
he believes himself to be. So it might make the release of his name,
even
as an unverified report, complicate his future plans. But the threat
that
by my death or lapse into semi coherency his name might be leaked, and
carry more credibility than if I simply state it in emails, might make
me
safer from the threat of this happening.>>
AND I WILL USE THE NAME HENRY because I mistakenly deleted the
first
name of one of our heroes, in one of the earlier transmissions of this
document. I do not want anyone to ever believe that I would accuse
that
great man, of being part in the crime ring in any way. His help to
our
attempts to expose the crime ring have made him an honored member,
although
I believe that he would find our honor reviling today. That might
change
in time because he is a Christian I believe and tolerance is a part of
the
teachings of Jesus. My sexual experimentation might offend many, but
until
the corrupt police made offers to me through an attractive CI, my
business
was mine. Now that I must shamefully accept the reality that I will
need
to admit to some deviance, I refuse to do so on the grounds that no
laws
were broken and it was adults over 35 years old in each case recorded.
And
I will not sue the miscreants who lured me into the experimentation
but I
will pray for their forgiveness. And I will worry for what I believe
to be
their repressed feelings of incompetence which would make them feel
that
even though I made it clear from the beginning that I will not have
sex
with anyone under a certain age, 30 years old at that time but the age
continues to follow me as I age, they attempted on several occasions
to
persuade me that underage girls were older than they were. Luckily I
do
not date twenty something and luckily they did not find a teenager who
looked thirty five, or they would have arrested me for statutory rape-
because I am easy when the terms are within my limits.
Enough about sex although I feel that the attempt in Utah which
failed
to arrest me for traumatizing a schoolbus load of children, will cause
the
criminals who committed the crime, and those who are so narrow minded
that
they would rather that an innocent man who has a marijuana past, would
be
arrested than for the voting public to be distressed with the
knowledge
that such despiccable people can sometimes qualify for police
recruits.
(The truth is that I was informed that the criminal who traumatized
the
children was an inmate removed from a prison for the crime. But the
officials who orchestrated the damned crime are just as guilty, if not
moreso, than that sex criminal who was allowed to drive a car and feel
his
sick pleasure in an attempt to accuse me.)
11/21/04 9:11:33 PM My daughter just phoned me- she left a message
earlier
while I was at Dad's girlfriend's- and she is in town so we now have
plans
for Tuesday night at about 6:00. The last time she and I saw each
other
some rather appalling attemtps were made to arrest me, one of which
could
have occurred while I was with her if I had reacted as desired. And
so, do
I ignore that threat and take my chances with a desperate crime ring
which
has superior ranking to the local police?
First I will mention some of what I read about following the past
attempts. I will make this brief because there is much discussion in
previous documents, some of which have the word "Random01" or
"Random02" or
"Random0(n)" or
"Soci" or possibly others that I will add when I remember, in the
title. I
am typing by recall when I have entered these choices, so I hope that
if I
am asked for contemporaneous discussions about this appalling attempt,
that
I will have the freedom to do some research. I was so shocked by what
almost occurred that I might have used titles that are not sequential,
etc.
So I will limit this to two: The first was an incident at the
Morrison
Hospital where my 103 year old cousin lived at the time. She still
lives
there but is now 104. She was drugged so that she would go to bed
earlier
than normal and when I arrived her door was partially open but I did
not
try to wake her. This decision might have saved my daughter from
extreme
embarrassment. Moments before I had used a bathroom in the hallway
entry,
which was coincidentally being cleaned by a cleaning lady. She might
have
been involved because as I almost decided not to use the facilities
she
made a verbal suggestion that I do so, and as I entered she todl me to
close the cover on the toilet paper holder. I was not intending to
use the
stall but her curious order made me peek my head in to see why she
would
suggest such a thing and I noticed that the door was opened, but I did
not
enter. After I used the urinal and washed my hands I thanked her as I
left
and my daughter and I contineud. She was then distracted so that
someone
was able to enter and place marijuana inside the toilet paper holder
and
close the door, leaving while she was still distracted. Additional
distractiosn were made but which she was turned toward the door
opening for
long enough that, with powerful suggestions immediately upon her
discovering the marijuana and hurrying to find her superiors to report
it,
she was persuaded to believe that she had not looked away for long
enough
for anyone to enter the bathroom except for me. Her witness testimony
is
expected to be believable.
The flaw in the plan was to believe that I have a mental disorder
which
would cause me to either enter my cousins room while she was in the
dark
sleeping, or demand assistance from the staff, who could not be seen
from
where my daughter and I could notice. I am stubborn and inconsiderate
at
times, admittedly arrogant too, but it was after hours. And although
my
cousin had assured me that she was allowed visitors during that time,
I
realized that the decent thing to do was to leave, which we did. I
noticed
that the cleaning lady was still cleaning the bathrooms and I would
have
asked her where the staff was to be found, if she had been out in the
hall.
The second was that apparently there was an auto with a license
number
which corresponded to the password harassment which I had received and
reported at Sauk Valley College. If I had noticed it and perhaps
pointed
it out to my daughter, it could have been used possibly in other parts
of
the deception. Or if I had the mental disorder that I was being
portrayed
as having, I might have attmepted to catch up with the auto and the
driver
would have allowed me to do so, with a report about my threatening him
or
her, while my duaghter was distracted by another accomplice.
And to complicate matters I have made a request to her that she
protect
herself at all cost so that I can worry less about her. She has
agreed to
do so and she would know that I meant to go to whatever lengths she
needed
to use.
So, do I fear for my daughter and fear from her too?
...I repeat my question: Should I ignore that past and take my
chances
with a desperate crime ring which has superior ranking to the local
police?
What I have learned is that there are some real comparisons between
the
witch trials of centuries past, with the Drug War today. And since
some of
the Drug WAr laws are almost identically the same laws- having
hibernated,
almost unused for hundreds of years except with an occasional usage by
maritime jurisdictions - but which are being abused by Drug War
officials
were abused similarly by the Medieval officials who burnt entire
populations at some times.
Some other comparisons include the willingness of adult children to
cause suffering to their dear mothers, so that officials can enforce
the
laws.
<
point in
the document since they were for a specific purpose which is not now
applicable>>
This email is a rough draft and is being sent prematurely as a
cautionary
measure. I have been warned that today or in my plans to travel to
Wisconsin to contact old acquaintance, I might be stopped by police,
or
found by police, to have lost mental coherency. And my return to
normal
might not be allowed. And it might be because the leader of the crime
ring
which is described in the final 14 pages of this email, needs for his
future plans to be completely unknown. If he is suspected of
terrorist
training, he could not be a savior who emerges in time to eradicate
all
terrorism with his skilled team of sruveillance experts.
So, his name is at the beginning of this email but I am removing it
and
keeping it only at my own email repositories. I have not received
verifications that he is the crime ring boss, and I hope that if he
is, I
am receiving some protection from him because of his need to keep his
name
completely out of the range fo possiblities.
There has been an epidemic disorder allied to hysteria known as
"dancing mania" which according to a reference published in the mid
20th
century was a "compulsive affectation...even in comparitively modern
times
and in the most civilized countries in Europe, under the influence of
strong popular excitement especially connected with religious
demonstrations" (The American Peoples Encyclopedia, 6-774. Published
in
1951 by The Spencer Press, Chicago).
There are some clearminded individuals who claim to believe that
all
mental illness is intentional and so we might guess what these people
might
suggest about the causes of this disorder. And if we asked someone
who had
been afflicted with the disorder, we might be unable to be sure about
their
belief but based on their answers we might come to our best guesses
about
them too.
When it comes to claims about hypnosis, whether that mental state
has
actually occurred or whether it is pretended, it might be viewed
similarly
by the two individuals discussed above. And I have some doubts about
it
but I remind myself that if I did not sleep myself, I might have
doubts
about the views on whether people really sleep or whether it is
pretense.
But there might be nobody who does not beleive that some people,
perhaps all people, block memories from childhood and even as adults.
And
these people truly might not remember some incident but which they can
be
reminded about and then become clearer in their memories as they
discuss
them, etc.
Anyone who disbelieves that 'dancing mania' was anything but
intentional display, might have some interesting explanations for the
incidence in court records during the centuries of witch trials, where
pious church members along with family members of the accused,
presented
false testimony which resulted in the accused's execution by barbaric
methods. Although specific examples can be presented elsewhere and
are
referred to in court records allegedly filed in Carroll County
Illinois as
case Coats v Eiders #2004-L-7, I will not list them here except to
refer to
an interesting case which happened to the mother of a famed astronomer
named Kepler. (And I only use the term "allegedly filed" when
referring to
the court case 2004-L-7 where I am the plaintiff because it has been
reported, probably merely for purposes of causing me distress, that
this
court filing and the subsequent legal motions have been blocked from
the
public record. And even the judge who dismissed the case without
prejudice
has reportedly been caused to become uncertain, so it seems likely
that the
case was filed and can be viewed by the public, while the reports
otherwise
were intended to cause uncertainties which woudl cause me to conduct
some
verifications which could be used as suggestions of symptoms of a
mental
disorder which might cause a court to agree that mental assessment was
necessary to ascertain whether I am competent to defend myself. And
as is
described below, if I tell the truth in a mental assessment but
without
being allowed to present evidence to the court case involved, I would
possibly be misdiagnosed. And furthermore, since I am aware of that
possible misdiagnosis, if I attempt to avoid the truth, a competent
therapist might detect it. So, a misdiagnosis might be the result for
any
mental assessment that I take prior to evidence being shown to the
court.
So if obstruction of justice might be the goal by corrupt officials
who I
have maintained are members of an organized corruption syndicate, and
that
the honest officials might be assisting the attempt to portray me as
having
a mental disorder due to their own concerns about an admitted
marijuana
exchanger being given credit for exposing crime, I should be allowed
the
right to defend myself against their opinions based on what might be
described as unsubstantiated rumors.
Since I have made allegations by court documents and maintained
repeatedly elsewhere that there is an attempt to obstruct justice
which is
a primary reason why I will not have been arrested until sufficient
cause
and witness testimony has been accumulated so as to prevent me from
being
allowed a defense, and since it has been years since this began,
during
which time I was offered immunity to possess marijuana instead of
simply
being arrested as would be expected, I hereby request that whether or
not a
claim is made about an ongoing investigation being conducted which
might
explain these prior situations atypical handling by police, whether or
not
I am shown to have been so confused, hostile, or bizarrely outrageous
in my
actions so as to demand a mental exam, even if with numerous witnesses
who
have agreed testimony- since I can show evidence including but not
limited
to the 14 page description of the crime ring whcih could also explain
these
sitautions and defend my own actions as being reasonable in the face
of
intentional harassment and emotional duress inflicted so as to support
such
allegations, that I be allowed to defend myself in any case. And
since I
can show evidence to support the allegation taht recent advances in
technology have occurred which mihtt make a court reconsider some
parts of
previous rulings, or even change some precedents as a result of these
recent advances in technology, I beleive that I should not be refused
the
right to defend myself unless I am allowed to show this evidence to
the
court.
There are some animals which feign injuries to lure predators away
from
their young and there are some animals which pretend to be dead for
purposes of protecting themselves. These faked attitudes can be seen
to
have some commonalities in that the target of teh attempt is a larger
or
stronger predator who might intend harm upon the animal pretending to
be
injured or dead. And it is a fake but since its intent is to overcome
an
aggressor which is more powerful, the fake must be as realistic as
possible. And, the faked position must be held for as long as is
necessary
to achieve the objective.
If either the faked injury is shown to ahve been a lure too soon or
too
late, the objective could be lost since if too soon, the family of the
faker might still be endangered; and if too late before the healthy
escape
is made, might mean the demise of the faker- and so the family might
still
be endangered.
Humans might be shown to do these things sometimes. But better
known
for the trap or springe where the sentence "give a man enough rope and
he'll hand himself" provides some self satisfying gloating for the
success.
But in cases where the trap can backfire, such as has the crime ring's
frame-ups against me, the desperation of the injured animal, turns
rabid
with rage.
My panicked conversations with my Dad on the night that I
subsequently
sent such panicked emails that the sentences were not even readable,
have
produced a strength and security for me now that might seem indecent
to the
nationalistic myopic mind of those voters who are willing to give up
justice and liberty, so long as they can feel stability and claim to
feel
glory. But where those claims of glory have been hollow, the
repercussions
and the damage that is felt for decades after, finally do emerge and
must
be felt by the offspring of the corrupt govenment which allowed it,
and
then abused powers to deny it.
But now that I have gloated and rubbed into the surveillance
equipment
my utter satisfaction about having accomplished this goal, "he who wil
be
overcome" or whovever it is, might go to extreme lengths to frame me
tomorrow when I attend a dinner at my DAd's girlfriend's house. If
this
occurs, I request the right to access this discussion as a part of my
defense that somebody big in teh rcriminal world, is abusing powers to
attempt to remain secret so that he can grow bigger inot the
government
that ejected him a few decades ago. Since he now knows that I will
attend
and that I must leave soon after so that I can work here at home, his
devious frame-up mentality might find some trick or cheating ruse to
fulfill his sick desires. Whether my food has been laced with drugs
so
that a normal traffic stop can lead to a drug test in the field, or
whether
some theft at DAd's girlfriend detected soon after I depart, or
whether
some nearby child is harmed by the actor who might be used to make it
seem
that I committed a crime after leaving during an episodic relapse into
that
multiple personality disorder that I have been labeled.
And if a last ditch and desperate attempt to claim that in another
personality I ranted and raved about the missed plane flights and
complcations in Dorothy's son's schedule, should realize that since I
achieved certain goals by ranting to Dad about Rosemary's call and
Franks,
now that those objectives ahve been achieved, any attempt to redefine
their
causes so that the criminals can regain strength, shoudl allow me to
access
these emails.
Furhtermore, since I have been assured that I would not regain
consciousness after being taken into custody for whatever episode was
described, if I am unable to present my own defense for any reason, I
hope
these emails and the 14 page description of the crime ring to whcih
they
refer, are made public as a possible cause of my untimely demise,
despite
any other claims, despite any other evidence, and despite any
plausibility
or reasonability rationale.
Plausibility
I think that it would not be unreasonable to state, based on the
followign document and particularly emails that were sent by myself in
late
September- about my being portrayed as ownign a private jet for
smuggling
cocaine from Pto. Vallarta and committing sex crimes among other
deviances,
and in early October about my being portrayed as having a multiple
personality who donated my grave site to a dead man who died in
circumstances whcih I had read about previously, where murder had been
committed with the experiemental riot control gun which fires a plasma
projectile, evaporating in seconds after impact- that whether these
two
incidences were real and/or even if they were not intended to occur
but
merely their reports to cause me to react in some way which might be
considered symptomatic: that either I am mentally unstable and have an
imagination that is dangerous, or the limits of plausibility must be
considered in my case becasue a crime ring has members who are
becoming
more desperate in their desire to prevent their own criems from
removing
them from office and placing them in a less hospitable government
environment (so to speak).
So, if the statements that I have made and claim to ahve evidence
to
support will be considered for a moment, then the limits of
plausiblity
should be considered. And as an example, whereas the idea of my
attending
a holiday dinner where some of the attendees woudl prefer to feel that
"law
and order" were being achieved, it mgiht be possible for wealthy
criminals
to use millions of their billions- a small price- to find body doubles
for
those at the dinner who would not cooperate and place them at the
table but
in an off hour moment so that a body double of my own could commit
some
acts which would shock, but not cause undue terror (such as might
cause
someone to reasonably leave the table and telephone police, perhaps
from a
neighbor's house).
What I am saying is that I believe that the crime ring members are
becoming desperate. And when I am not allowed to walk into a Walmart
without being subjected to a scam which, if I had succumbed to teh
impulse
to shake hands with the man who had such a friendly smile, I would
ahve
ended up accused of using karate style leverage to damage his hand so
badly
that I woudl ahve been forced to stay in custody to protect the
community,
during which time the previous hours, days, months and years could be
described falsely but by the intimidated witnesses of my ex wife and
others, so that the pretended victims of those past years could be
brought
forward seemingly as if found by the testimony of my ex wife or others
like
her who knew me personally well enough to be shocked at my occasional
violent surges at the time and so remembered them, but which then when
I
relaxed into the mild mannered man so that they felt safe being around
and
decided to continue to socialize with).
I have been informed taht certain unacceptable frame ups have
occurred
where people I know have received emails and letters and even
telephone
calls, to their children in some cases, by someone wiht my voice and
claiming to be me, or else claimig NOT to be me, but making it clear
taht
they ARE ME but are lying about it. I have not wanted to beleive
these
claims and I hope they are nto true, but based on my knowledge about
the
reports which are described above about private jets and graveyard
plots,
and described below about simpleton hand crushing- plus the newspaper
articles and ads and radio ads targeted to attract my attention in
recent
months so as to cause me to act in some way ranging from simply making
an
appointment to see a doctor in one case, or to causing me to join into
an
obviously false report about a prostitution smuggling ring on the
other AND
even into other areas of implausiblity to what would be viewed as
having
reached levels of "nth" extremes- I am inclined to feel that I should
reconsider my hestitation that perhaps Chaplain Dwight Myers of the
Portland OR area received a different letter than I sent to him, but
in my
envelope and with my apparent handwriting. And insde that letter was
a
testimonial to a Multnomah County deputy which mihgt have been
replaced
with some shocking note, intended to cause me to be unattractive to
her if
or when I arrive back there in custody. (Since I will reportedly be
incoherent, with doctors diagnosing the final explanation for my
bizarre
mental deterioriation and demise, with my family having been coerced
into
agreeing that I had been acting strangely the crime ring reprotedly
beleives it has enough intelligence about all email recipients so that
no
rumors will even begin about suspicions, unless those rumors are begun
intentionally by crime ring members who will subsequently be tested
for
drugs, or disease, or some reason to explain their odd claims. I have
warned email recipients in teh past to forward all emails that they
receive
from me or about me, to media reporters or at least to others who will
testify for them if they are arrested in a frame-up or entrapment
which is
possibly intended to silence them due to their knowledge about our
attempt
to report a money launderign operation to the IRS tax fraud division.)
Also, I have been warned that dear family friend in Colorado
received
emails that I did not send and might have received phone calls,
followed by
apologies from concerned members of my family or others, explainting
that I
have been acting strangely and they do not know waht to do because I
am a
"smart criminal" that detested reject of society.
I have also been informed by sources, which were once credible but
I am
going to protect myself here from falsified reports by reminding that
I
have heard both that a witness is deceased and that she faked her
death so
my sources are in need of verificaitons, whcih sources claim to ahve
seen
or heard, in first person, discussions about other outrageous contacts
whcih I will be accused of making. And that each of these would also
have
been placed under surveillance and their own lives so carefully
considered
for blackmail or plausible injuries or death, if they will not
cooperate in
this frame-up- even dropping out with testimony claiming that they
were
never part of the scam if named by our sources so that their continued
participation might jeopardize the frame-up's potention to deceive-
need
not be explained here because the 14 page description of the crime
ring
illustrates that probability. [[[[[*****This quint asterisk discusses
this
slightly in an email to Bob Webb on 11/20/2004 from
ANTAE.org@iname.com to
his BobWebb440@earthlink.net and I have pasted a few paragraphs from
that
email below where five asterisks mark the spot]]]]]
Sometimes I consider, while in a realistically human moment and
therefore
affected by emotion and therefore un
Last might I referred to a call that I had received from a "Bob"
and my
discussions about that call can be considered below. I returned his
call
last night and have done so again tonight and asked him to call me. I
should add that this Bob will be shown by evidence to have been an
unwitting accomplice. He is not a member and would not be aware that
anything beyond some tricky deceptions by some deceptive police were
attempted. The man who was to have "found" my daughter's letter
however,
would be considered a member although he was reported in previous
documents
to be actually a future pawn, placed into the trusting position of
children
for use in undermining religions who do not worship the leader of the
crime
ring, "he who will be overcome".
11/19/04 10:55 PM I returned his call finally to reach him and
was
invited to be part of the 7th WOC weekend in March 5 2005. I could
not
attend but told him I was grateful for his invitation since my
weekend,
number 3, was a moving experience. And my sponsoring a woman for
weekend
number 4, when I was forced to cancel my involvement due to harassment
from
teh criminal organization described in the 14 page description of the
crime
ring. I told the others who I felt like I let down, that I woudl
email the
reason why I had been forced to cancel and I asked Bob tonight if I
coudl
call him after the email arrives and discuss the final 14 pages with
him,
pointing out to him that I reported a money laundering operation to
the IRS
tax fraud division in LA. I also told him that I was amazed that
weekend
number 7 was here already but it makes sense becasue the 5th would
have
been in March 2004 and the 6th would have been in the past few
weekends.
He told me he woudl be willing to discuss the 14 pages and was
surprised to
hear that there were about 50 pages total.
I had realized earlier though that based on what I was informed and
which
I describe below, that his call to me, if I cannot prove that it
arrived
could be blamed on my imagination by the deceiving thieves of truth,
that
criminal organization described in the 14 pages of the crime ring. By
this
I mean that I had deleted the message from Dad's message machine and
with
surveillance possibly detecting my doing so, and the previous warnings
taht
it woudl be claimed that I had imagined messages, I was concerned.
My Dad listened to teh message apparently. Someone had and he
woudl be
the only likely someone. But what was established in the hours
previously,
was the beginning of an acceptance by him that he is responding to
coercive
persuasion. He dened that his memory was alternately good then
blurred and
then good again, even when I gave examples. He began to see the
difference
between organized corruption and what he continues to attempt to
excuse it
with, normal individual acts of corruption. The example that I used
where
I had two years ago told him that porn production was being produced
inside
the prisons, in which he had brought up a neighbor woman's sad
experience
of getting pregnant while in prison, but to which I reminded him that
since
no organization was shown by financial profit or power growth, there
was no
comparison. He then began to discuss once again how he had always
heard
about prisoner rapes and I interrupted him to tell him that he was
attempting to excuse it again by comparing the crime ring that I had
reported to the IRS to what he had heard before and which was normal
human
weakness. He then tried to again. These repetitions seem to continue
into
acts of denial. Or at least the final discussions became so
contradictory
that he ended them abruptly and told me he had to leave: I brought up
his
unwillingness to listen to me about carpentry and he denied it and
when he
asked for examples I told him about the gutters at the SE corner of
the
house where I had suggested steeper slope since the hip rafter tail
might
sag up to half an inch after enough decades of snow load. But he
ignored
my suggestion and during this discussion told me he had heard me
wrong. He
thought I had suggested that it should be more level. This is not a
possible misunderstanding since we discussed dropping it up to 1/2" in
the
first four feet but I did not press the issue because I remembered
that I
had suggested that we screw the gutters below the metal edging of the
shingle roof edge, but he had insisted on screwing them over the face
of
the metal. Later that day I had gone to him and urged him to let me
move
them before teh scaffolding was moved but he woudl not listen but when
David was here he confirmed my concerns. Dad had heard him and so
when I
brought it up Dad became agitated and shouted an accusation at me.
"You're
the carpenter so why didn't you put them under?" Then he must have
realized the contradictions and said that he had to leave. I do not
like
the feeling that I get when this kind of truth is dragged into the
discussio but after his changes about the message that Jim Neubauer
had
left on the message machine the past summer, which finally resulted in
Dad
telling me that Jim had left a message specifically asking for me to
call
him back but that "we just forgot" and should not make a big deal
about it,
I need to retain clear distinctions between waht people want him to
beleive, and what is the truth. I need the truth to be adhered to at
all
times.
And although I did make a copy of Bob's message so that I can refer
to
it if needed, it has become apparent taht my being taken into custody
will
be done in a way that will prevent my ability to refer to any kind of
proof. I will not be taken into custody while I have a defense. So,
I
request the right to refer to these sentences, if any doubt about his
telephone call to me is brought into any question about my reliability
in
memory or credibility in thought.
I had been warned that calls might be made and messages passed with
me
in the passage but which afterward the others would deny that they had
left
me the message or that I had left one for them- or that I had left
messages
for them which made no sense because they had not left a message for
me.
So I asked Dad to tell me if he was told by anyone that I was doing
this to
them, and he agreed to do so. I taped the conversation for use in
reference to the sociology study that I am working, and his agitation
is
plainly noticeable in his voice and his attempts to diffuse the
subject.
But he did agree to do so and so if this claim is made by others I
request
the right to refer to this discussion and the 14 page description of
the
crime ring which describes the methods and the resources which woudl
allow
such an elaborate deception and with witness testimony. And my having
reported a money laundering operation to the IRS which public records
have
been altered and the IRS has been requested to postpone their
investigation, while an "ongoing investigation" can be completed which
woudl portray me as having a mental disorder which would cause me to
be
unable to present testimony to support the crime report of the money
laundering operation at 830 E. Kensington in Los Angeles across Sunset
from
Dodger Stadium.
11/19/04 7:58 AM I think I am asking too much from my Dad and although
the
risks might be reduced if I asked him to accompany me today to witness
the
filed documents which I discussed with him, my concern for his health
causes me to prefer to wait.
Particularly our discussions afterward are of concern to me where
we
talked about the 14 page description of the crime ring indicating that
his
friends and clients could be caused to act in ways that would assist
in the
crimes, make me concerned. IN the final moments of that discussion
and his
assuring me that he beleived me, he began denying that he had told me
in
previous discussions taht he did beleive me. Particularly the
incident
where my sister Patty told me she had cocaine and when he now changes
his
story to belief that she might have been using cocaine, I brought up
the
experimental crowd control gun which fires a plasma projectile, which
evaporates after it inflicts damage. He then began to say that he
coudl
not believe and I reminded him of other times that he had said that.
Finally, in my mistaken idea that he might be seeing more clearly what
was
occurring in his own mind, I brought up his recent lack of allowing my
experience as a carpenter to be used for important decisions on the
remodeling of the house. He refused to remember some incidents,
changed
what he believed had been said between us, until finally I brought up
an
installation of gutters which I had suggested against, then after
thinking
about it had suggested that we move it to correct the unusual
installation
while the scaffolding was sitll handy. At that point he seemed to
accuse
me of the mistake. He said "You're the carpenter. Why didn't you put
it
on right?" and I realized at that time that since I had twice
attempted to
change his orders on the installation but he was now trying to blame
me,
that he is not his old self and he should not be subjected to more
stress.
He has had a heart attack and a stroke, and I will find a safer way
for his
sake, to straighten the problems out.
My Dad's knowledge that I do record so much of the conversations
might
make them admissible in a hearing. If he were coerced into refusing
to
allow them it might seem unusual. And my having told him that I do
have
recordings of one of the church elders telling me that he will lie,
and
that this is the church elder who was reported to have had a
homosexual
affair- also who I told my Dad last night had made statements to me
like
other church elders which were intended to be so bizarre and often of
a
sexual nature. This so that when these honest people subsequently
denied
making the statements it would seem that I had imagined them.
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Ahem: Occasionally I check my own receipt of a message sent from
another of
my email addresses. And I think that I should do so more often.
Please do not read this following message nor the prior that it
intends to
apologize for its nonconstructive grammar, unintelligable wording,
disjointed transitions- and all of this in the first few sentences.
A clearer version will be arriving in a few days. But I hope you will
keep
this version until then, unread, but accessible. The reasons for my
requesting this, are difficult to grasp from the accompanying email.
But they are there nonetheless.
Dan
11/18/04 7:53:46 PM To: Nora@November.org, Chuck@November.org,
Borden@drcnet.org, rboje@hotmail.com, ssradicool@aol.com,
weedy@pot-tv.net,
PeterMcWilliams@aol.com
Note: forwarded message attached.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Barabbas nee Daniel M Coats"
To: SpartacusVSDEAmonEmpire@WashingtonDC.USA.com,
RobinHoodVsNarcoticShamShareIf@yahoo.com,
4thOfJuly.edu@freedom.USA.com,
ANTAE.org@iname.com, ADayIn7@yahoo.com,
MahlonHusbandOfRuth.edu@juno.com
Subject: Barabbas rough draft 16pgEDIT November 18 2004
This is a postscript "To hwom" (sic):
After hastily keying in the message prior to the rough draft I
decided
not to transmit to anyone except my own email repositories because
although
the final paragraph in the preface note makes it clear that I believe
that
the intention was likely to have been to cause me to react in some
rash way
which could be used by the crime ring as evidence of symptoms to
support
some future attempt to take me into custody while preventing me from
being
allowed to defend myself until after a court ordered mental exam had
been
conducted. As is discussed in the rough draft, if I take a mental
exam
while I am attempting to report a large crime ring which has taken
control
of some of the USDOJ, but I am not allowed to present evidence to show
that
this might be true, I would possibly be misdiagnosed. In other words
if I
tell the truth I will fail the mental exam based on that truth. But
also,
if I attempt to avoid the subject so that it is not discussed, a
competent
therapist might notice my attempts and there might also be a
misdiagnosis
for my attempting to evade the matter. This is discussed more later
but
for readers who have not read that second potential problem, I thought
I
would make its possibility apparent.
I've decided now to send that email to some recipients.
And the reason I have changed my mind, is because whereas earlier the
coincidental telephone calls which complicated my attempt to do what
the
following message discusses, would likely be plausibly based
coincidences
and although the 14 page description of the crime ring shows how this
could
be done by their members, there was no convincing evidence that it had
occurred. And that has only changed slightly since that time, but
because
of that slight change, I am sending this to others.
The change is that I have received a phone call myself. Or I
should
say that I have received a message from someone who will call back
tonight.
I will call him Bob. And I will make it clear that in the rough draft
that follows, I discuss the unfortunate terminal illness of someone
who I
sponsored to attend a Christian retreat weekend known as Way of Christ
(WOC). This caller was involved with WOC and in a significant way
which
could be shown to the court in Ada County Idaho which is intended to
expose
the criminal organization which is discussed in the 14 page
description of
the crime ring, which 14 pages are included at the end of this email.
And
he was one of the first members who I met when I attended my "Pilgrim"
weekend. And, although it is not discussed in this email, an attempt
was
made in my first weekend, by switching envelopes which my daughter's
letter
was to arrive, so that when I opened her letter and it was another
letter
inside, I would search for the correct letter and after enough
enthusiastic
support by certain people at the table which I was sitting, the letter
would be found and seem to have been lost by myself. This would make
me
seem confused and be the beginning of a sequence of events which would
have
eventually led to my being forced to submit to a mental exam. (I
should
mention that at the time I had found medical marijuana in my safe
deposit
box and had reported it to police. I expected to be arrested but
instead
was offered immunity to possess the marijuana if I handed it over to
police
and accepted their decision not to investigate the source of the
marijuana.
The weeks during this time were stressful and resulted a few weeks
after
this WOC weekend, with my handing the marijuana over to police, and
subsequently being ordered to submit to a mental exam. And I will add
furthermore that I am required by the conditions of probation to
comply
with this specific order, but refused for nearly one year with excuses
in
writing to my probation officer, finally ending the immediacy of the
order
by writing to my probation officer my intention to challenge his order
in a
hearing unless he removed it. The result was that he did remove it
but he
claimed to have not made a specific order but was merely referring to
my
eventual condition for my probation. His sidestepping the issue made
it
seem as if I had imagined the problem. I do have telephone
conversations
with him which were recorded and which show that he did order me to
submit,
but the intention of the frame-ups, some of which are discussed below,
being designed to prevent me from being allowed to defend myself,
might
make my evidence less useful.)
Anyway, this Bob who telephoned tonight was one of the "witnesses"
at
the table who would have testified that I seemed confused the entire
weekend and hostile at times. He was not the one who would have
"found" my
daughter's letter but because the man who played that role was already
used
in an attempt which failed last January, he might have caused himself
to be
a source for my right to a defense.
I do not know for sure but because this man called tonight I
believe
that I might be correct in thinking that the goal of the earlier calls
to
my Dad was to cause me to react, and although they would surely seem
justified coincidences and so will the reason for Bob's calling me
afterward, I can show in court that Bob was involved in previous
incidences, including the "missing purse" of the woman who I sponsored
to a
WOC weekend. Since she is discussed in the following rough draft and
since
this 'Bob' can be shown to be complicit in the frame-ups discussed and
other incidents, I have decided to send this to others. If I am
incorrect,
at least my ability to present evidence against "Bob" in the court
case
which is intended to expose the crime ring, makes me offer an apology
for
my error but my apology is subject to that court case and the evidence
which will be presented.
Thank you,
Dan
I apologize for not having time to edit this rough draft note, but I
must
return to the editing of the original which should be sent soon.
Titled in MSDOS: "16pgEDIT"
Titled in MSWord: "The 16 page description of a corruption syndicate
and
the 14 page description of its criminal origins~"
11/12/04 9:48:53 AM To: SpartacusVSDEAmonEmpire@WashingtonDC.USA.com,
RobinHoodVsNarcoticShamShareIf@yahoo.com,
4thOfJuly.edu@freedom.USA.com,
ANTAE.org@iname.com, ADayIn7@yahoo.com,
MahlonHusbandOfRuth.edu@juno.com
To hwom:
I have been concerned that the Drug War crime ring might have
abused
the power of office that the 14 page description of the crime ring
which
included in this email, discusses. Because the court case that I
dismissed
at Carroll County Illinois on October 28, 2004 was heard one half hour
earlier than scheduled and other matters have arisen which cause me
concerns, I asked my Dad to go to the courthouse with me and be a
witness
for me that the case is there and that it was dismissed without
prejudice.
Almost immediately after he agreed to accompany me early next week,
the
phone began to ring and he is now becoming busier with friends who
need his
help. If he is not able to accompany me to verify that the corut case
was
filed and that it was dismissed, I hope that the following rough draft
of
what will be emailed in a few days after being completed, will be
allowed
into my defense if I am found to be needing one but where a motion to
force
me to submit to mental testing has been made. Or if I am found dead
for
any reason, or if I am found to be unable to respond due to some
mental or
physical impairment, I request that this and previous emails be
investigated.
I have filed documents for the court which I received from the
USDOJ
that surveillance was in use previously and I have evidence that it
has
been used since that FOIA request was fulfilled. And the surveillance
on
the kitchen that I asked my Dad to accompany me to Carroll County
courthouse so that he could witness these documents will be shown to
be
under surveillance in more than one focussed way and by more than one
agency.
It is possible that his calls were coincidental and this email is
merely as a precaution. As will be discussed below an attempt two
days ago
at the Clinton Iowa Walmart, when it is supported by evidence, will
show
that the cirme ring is beoming more desperate.
This email is intended as a precaution despite my serious belief
that
the phone calls which caused my Dad to becoem unable to be a witness
for
me, were partly coincidental and those which might have been
instigated by
the crime ring officials were intended to cause me to react in a way
that
might be useful for them. And if that was the intention, it was
successful. I caused my Dad and myself some stress as I tried to
remind
him about the 14 page description of the crime ring and the methods
described which could have caused those calls to be so timely. And so
I
will add that if the intent was to cause my Dad so much distress that
he
believes that he should break his word and end our three year
agreement,
then I request the right ot refer to this email and those preceding it
which discuss the attempt to use coercive persuasion.
Thank you,
Dan
PS This discusses itself being a satire work in progress and those
parts
were intended to be removed prior to the final transmission. I do not
have
time to do that now. So, I hope the attempts at humor do not cause
dismay.
The primary evidence to support the facts will be shown and the humor
was
intended to protect.
of
the crime ring. But because other reports have been shown to be
possibly
incorrect, I will not divulge that information until a later time. I
will
refer to him or her by pronoun or as "Does 1-100" or as "he who will
be
overcome" for dramatic purposes not intended to be taken seriously.>
11/14/04 9:08 PM FIND: " <> " and fix the disjointed mess or
delete
it.
Some (but very few) of you are aware of some parts of my harassment
problem
because you have been willing to help the honest local police but who
you
might not be aware, are following orders from superior officials who
are
not always honest. There is little choice for them, but for you this
information might be interesting because you do have choices. And
where
your communities might benefit by your making knowledgeable decisions
when
your government asks for your cooperation, it is your communities
which
your families most directly are affected. So this information is
offered
for your knowledge, and not as anything more than that. You have no
obligation to obey orders, as long as you are obeying the law. Some
might
refer to Biblical passages whcih suggest otherwise but if you believe
that
there is no limit to what is stated in Romans 13, then you might
believe
that the Iraqis should have been all helping Saddam Hussein. Or that
the
Cubans should all be helping Castro. Etc.
I am in the belief that there must be no public support of obvious
corruption in any government. And if I can show you that my case is
not
what will be presented to you, because your local officers are not
allowed
to ask questions from superiors, I hope you will ask questions if
urged to
assist in anything that will cause my arrest, particularly if it might
seem
odd to you that my entrapment must be designed, not only to arrest me,
but
must do so while causing me to seem to be confused, or hostile, or
acting
in a bizarre or outrageous manner.
The reason for this unusual need to cast my credibility into doubt,
is
that I have reported a massive crime to the IRS tax fraud division in
Los
Angeles, CA. And in order to obstruct justice, certain federal
officials
have abused their powers of office to persuade the IRS to postpone
their
investigation into that crime. As you might guess, if I am telling
the
truth then the officials who I reported to the IRS are powerful enough
to
make such interagency requests.
In the following pages it will be discussed why our attempts to
report
the crimes which have occurred by a criminal organization which has
members
inside the federal agencies, have resulted in our members being placed
under surveillance and entrapments into crimes, or frame-ups
attempted.
Those few of us remaining after more than two years of attempts to
bring
this issue into a courtroom and thus bypass the policing authorities
so
that the courts can make initial decisions based on our allegations
and
evidence, are being supported by police- some of whom are working
inside
this crime ring, but feel that their betrayal to their oaths of office
outweighs their loyalties to their precincts or agencies.
The allegations in this discussion might seem impossible. And
stating
them might cause most people to disbelieve so that they read no
further.
But when these honest police officers recognized that a powerful drug
lord
had recognized the benefits in strengthening his crime ring by adding
police as members, he also realized that if he caused new applicants
to
enter the police while they were working in his criminal organization,
and
then used surveillance technology to monitor police from the inside,
he
woudl be able to cause some promotions to be awarded to his recruits.
And
with enough time passed and enough focus by his recruits, a momentum
might
be achieved which would cause his crimes to be easier to commit. But
he
was aware that this coudl only be done if he coudl keep secrecy
absolute
and so he has spent vast wealth to monitor gossip coming out of the
policing agencies, by use of surveillance. And if this seems
impossible
please keep in mind that if he could train his new recruits to use the
surveillance and they train their underlings, etc, and especially if
he
could cause his recruits to be promoted into the commander positions
so
that surveillance was in his control, this coudl be done. And after
more
than two decades of his criminal efforts, beginning with federal
agencies
in the US Department of Justice so that his lowest recruits had rank
above
the state and local police, by Constitutional laws, he was able to
then
enter some of the state agencies, police and tax, more quickly and
easily.
In the following discussion (and in previous transmissions to some
who
have been recipients), the growth of this crime ring will be shown to
have
been monitored and infiltrated by a citizens' coalition who were
gathering
information for sociology studies until the advent of the Internet,
when
some of our members suddenly found themselves in powerful positions
for
surveillance purposes, so that we began to train investigators to
gather
evidence of crimes whcih we beleived coudl then be reported to police.
Although since we have some members who are police, it became apparent
to
them that reporting the crimes to police in jurisditions where this
crime
ring had infiltrated might not be productive. And unfortunately the
crimes
detected were found most often in those areas. And unfortunately as
years
passed by while we held evidence available, teh growth of the crime
ring
outpaced our investigations. Finally, for reasons based more on
coincidence than planning, crimes committed by the crime ring in Los
Angeles California yielded sufficient evidence for us to prosecute the
case
in civil court.
More than two years ago we began to file lawsuits for this purpose
and, as will be discussed below, harassment, spies, and deception have
caused lawsuits to be dismissed while we investigated the causes for
the
dismissals. And this too will be discussed in the following.
If I have covered too much subject matter too quickly I apologize.
Or
if anyone feels that this sounds too much like the plot of a poorly
written
detective story, I suggest that you allow us to show the evidence.
That
request to present evidence is what this transmission to you is
intended to
allow me to complete. There has been much effort to prevent it from
happening for reasons which might seem obvious, since the members do
not
wish to lose their badges. But I have been accused of being a police
hater
and I will state now that it was an attempt to label me in a way that
would
assist in causing my arrest to be able to include evidence which could
be
used to persuade a court to order me to sumbit to a mental exam prior
to my
being allowed to defend myself. And as will be explained below that
in
itself is an attempt to obstruct justice: If I am telling the truth
about
a large crime ring having infiltrated federal policing agencies, but
am not
allowed to present evidence to support that statement, a competent
therapist might misdiagnose me if I am tested. But if I attempt to
avoid
subjects which pertain to my employment as an investigator, or the
harassment that I have reaceived becasue of my employment, a competent
therapist might misdiagnose. And either misdiagnosis might
successfully
obstruct justice since my testimony woudl be caused to be less
credible.
And since my coworkers who are not now in police custody would not
likely
be willing to attempt to complete what my name was volunteered to be
used
for reaching the courtroom, whereafter the evidence is presented to
the
court and only if it is sufficiently ruled admissible, I will name
witnesses of whom some are police. At that time, if media attention
causes
reprisals by the crime ring to become difficult, our organization will
be
less likely to suffer harassment. And others who are not named for
the
corut, might voluntarily come forward.
Furthermore, included with this transmission is what I will refer
to as
"the 14 page description of the crime ring" in which the criminal
organization which I have already begun to describe for its specific
focus
on attracting corrupt police as members, and which has been given
various
titles ranging from a "corruption syndicate" to the "Drug War Mafia,"
is
described for its criminal origins and some of its criminal methods.
That
14 page description is enumerated in the text so that emailing will
not
alter my ability to discuss some paragraphs in some pages, over the
phone
with an email recipient. And I will be calling some of you to confirm
receipt of this transmission, so I hope you will at barest minimum
check to
see if the 14 page description of the crime ring is included. It can
be
found by searching for the words:
Correspondent:: HellPope Huey
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 17:03:48 GMT
--------
In article ,
elvis_bond@hotmail.com (Howard Hughes) wrote:
> *The thing is, I wonder how I got on this elite list of recipients*
> could someone read this and post a summary? I'm too busy.
"I am a mentally-disturbed moron with serious sexual issues, distorted
religious mania and an abusive upbringing scrambling my brains and
therefore I would like to send in my $30 and become an official
SubNenius so "Dob" can save me from the aliens and the heathens and the
devil and my mother and the pixies and the disckscordians and nenslo and
the rays and everything, praise 'Nob' and please send more dem kind pils
and a 9x 'Rob'head shirt, pleez, nankyoo."
> *They said it was too long to email so I chopped off about 4/5 of it.
Sounds like a Youth for Christ initiation. They get rid of most of that
nasty penis so you will not be tempted by Satan to keep bothering Mrs.
Johnson's poor little bulldog anymore. DOWN, BOY, DOWN!
--
HellPope Huey
The abject beauty of the blah blah blah
is directly and inversely proportional
to the grinding horror of the ungh urgh argh.
For every human problem,
there is a neat, simple solution;
and it is always wrong
- H. L. Mencken
"I like my sex the way I like my basketball:
one-on-one and with as little rimming as possible."
- "Naked Gun 33 1/3: The Final Insult"
Correspondent:: raindog151@gmail.com (the anti-nenslo)
Date: 23 Nov 2004 10:00:56 -0800
--------
elvis_bond@hotmail.com (Howard Hughes) :
> *The thing is, I wonder how I got on this elite list of recipients*
> could someone read this and post a summary? I'm too busy.
Summary:
LEARN TO FUCKING SPELL.
Correspondent:: polar bear
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 16:47:17 -0800
--------
In article ,
raindog151@gmail.com (the anti-nenslo) wrote:
> elvis_bond@hotmail.com (Howard Hughes) :
>
> > *The thing is, I wonder how I got on this elite list of recipients*
> > could someone read this and post a summary? I'm too busy.
>
> Summary:
>
> LEARN TO FUCKING SPELL.
You're no anti-nenslo. You're not even a half-nenslo.
Give it up.
pb
Correspondent:: Frere Jean Bleu
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 06:42:58 +1100
--------
On 23 Nov 2004 05:42:48 -0800, elvis_bond@hotmail.com (Howard Hughes)
wrote:
> Last might I referred to a call that I had received from a "Bob"
>and my discussions about that call can be considered below. I returned his
>call last night and have done so again tonight and asked him to call me. I
>should add that this Bob will be shown by evidence to have been an
>unwitting accomplice.
Poor bastard doesn't realise "Bob" is the man behind the curtain,
having fun with his MKULTRA repertoire.
Fr J B