Posted by:: nenslo Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 23:38:28 -0800
--------
Even though it is excessively simple, or perhaps because it is, this is
one of the most difficult concepts for many to grasp. The SubGenius
must HAVE slack. Not get, find, be given, deserve, locate or borrow.
HAVE. Have means only one thing. You can't sort of have slack. You
can't have SOME slack or a lot of slack or a medium amount of slack or
any quantity of slack because slack is not quantitative. Either you
have it or you don't. The SubGenius must have slack. You either have
it or you don't. Having slack isn't what makes you a SubGenius. Being
a SubGenius is what makes you have slack.
I didn't just invent this. It is not a debatable point. If your idea
is different from this, your idea is wrong.
Posted by:: "krustymadfaker" Date: 28 Feb 2005 23:56:47 -0800
--------
>>>>>>>>Even though it is excessively simple, or perhaps because it is,
this is
one of the most difficult concepts for many to grasp. The SubGenius
must HAVE slack. Not get, find, be given, deserve, locate or borrow.
HAVE. Have means only one thing. You can't sort of have slack. You
can't have SOME slack or a lot of slack or a medium amount of slack or
any quantity of slack because slack is not quantitative. Either you
have it or you don't. The SubGenius must have slack. You either have
it or you don't. Having slack isn't what makes you a SubGenius. Being
a SubGenius is what makes you have slack.
I didn't just invent this. It is not a debatable point. If your idea
is different from this, your idea is wrong. >>>>>
You really have lost it. Halt your fetish. Stop knocking over the Vegan
drunks at Trader Joe's.
Nobody here wants a lecture on slack from you.
"Happiness is [DELETED FOR SECURITY REASONS]"
- The Computer
"All internal security agents please turn in your personal effects and
report to the food vats." -Paranoia R.P.G.
Posted by:: "ArWeGod" Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2005 10:42:00 GMT
--------
"krustymadfaker" wrote in message
news:1109663807.616403.136320@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> >>>>>>>>Even though it is excessively simple, or perhaps because it
is,
> this is
> one of the most difficult concepts for many to grasp. The SubGenius
> must HAVE slack. Not get, find, be given, deserve, locate or borrow.
> HAVE. Have means only one thing. You can't sort of have slack. You
> can't have SOME slack or a lot of slack or a medium amount of slack or
> any quantity of slack because slack is not quantitative. Either you
> have it or you don't. The SubGenius must have slack. You either have
> it or you don't. Having slack isn't what makes you a SubGenius.
Being
>
> a SubGenius is what makes you have slack.
>
>
> I didn't just invent this. It is not a debatable point. If your idea
> is different from this, your idea is wrong. >>>>>
>
> You really have lost it. Halt your fetish. Stop knocking over the
Vegan
> drunks at Trader Joe's.
>
> Nobody here wants a lecture on slack from you.
"nenslo" wrote in message
news:42241BF0.1760EA7E@yahoox.com...
> Even though it is excessively simple, or perhaps because it is, this is
> one of the most difficult concepts for many to grasp. The SubGenius
> must HAVE slack. Not get, find, be given, deserve, locate or borrow.
> HAVE. Have means only one thing. You can't sort of have slack. You
> can't have SOME slack or a lot of slack or a medium amount of slack or
> any quantity of slack because slack is not quantitative. Either you
> have it or you don't. The SubGenius must have slack. You either have
> it or you don't. Having slack isn't what makes you a SubGenius. Being
> a SubGenius is what makes you have slack.
>
> I didn't just invent this. It is not a debatable point. If your idea
> is different from this, your idea is wrong.
I disagree, the idea of slack actually is anti-slack!, if you think that you
have slack how can you have true slack? and how the hell can anyone "have"
slack, its an impossibility
On anther note Slack just seems to be a rip-off of the Zen term Samadi
(excuse my spelling) its a load of crap that doesnt work in REAL life, and
the ultimate slack master J R "Bob" Dobbs is a fucking prick and full of
ANTI-SLACK and he should be killed as the OTHER subgenius rip-off saying
goes (If you meet "BoB" kill him) which is of course a rip-off of the Zen
saying "if you meet the Buddha kill him"
Posted by:: "Rev. Ivan Stang" Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 09:29:11 -0500
--------
In article , Rev
Chain Smerker wrote:
> "nenslo" wrote in message
> news:42241BF0.1760EA7E@yahoox.com...
> > Even though it is excessively simple, or perhaps because it is, this is
> > one of the most difficult concepts for many to grasp. The SubGenius
> > must HAVE slack. Not get, find, be given, deserve, locate or borrow.
> > HAVE. Have means only one thing. You can't sort of have slack. You
> > can't have SOME slack or a lot of slack or a medium amount of slack or
> > any quantity of slack because slack is not quantitative. Either you
> > have it or you don't. The SubGenius must have slack. You either have
> > it or you don't. Having slack isn't what makes you a SubGenius. Being
> > a SubGenius is what makes you have slack.
> >
> > I didn't just invent this. It is not a debatable point. If your idea
> > is different from this, your idea is wrong.
>
> I disagree, the idea of slack actually is anti-slack!, if you think that you
> have slack how can you have true slack? and how the hell can anyone "have"
> slack, its an impossibility
>
> On anther note Slack just seems to be a rip-off of the Zen term Samadi
> (excuse my spelling) its a load of crap that doesnt work in REAL life, and
> the ultimate slack master J R "Bob" Dobbs is a fucking prick and full of
> ANTI-SLACK and he should be killed as the OTHER subgenius rip-off saying
> goes (If you meet "BoB" kill him) which is of course a rip-off of the Zen
> saying "if you meet the Buddha kill him"
>
You guys!
A *REAL* SubGenius (like *ME,* ahem, ahum) can talk for an HOUR about
Slack and NEVER ONCE say what it is!
Amateurs.
I hope with practice to get to the point where I can talk for TWO hours
and yet say NOTHING AT ALL.
--
The SubGenius Foundation, Inc.
(4th Stangian Orthodox MegaFisTemple Lodge of the Wrath of Dobbs Yeti,
Resurrected, Rev. Ivan Stang, prop.)
P.O. Box 181417, Cleveland, OH 44118 (fax 216-320-9528)
Dobbs-Approved Authorized Commercial Outreach of The Church of the SubGenius
SubSITE: http://www.subgenius.com PRABOB
Posted by:: "just john" Date: 1 Mar 2005 07:22:47 -0800
--------
Rev. Ivan Stang wrote:
> Amateurs.
>
> I hope with practice to get to the point where I can talk for TWO
hours
> and yet say NOTHING AT ALL.
>
... putting the "babble on" back into Babylon!
Posted by:: "Blackout" Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2005 09:14:07 -0700
--------
"Rev. Ivan Stang" wrote
> I hope with practice to get to the point where I can talk for TWO hours
> and yet say NOTHING AT ALL.
swelled dope huey to the white courtesy telephone please
Posted by:: Zapanaz Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 09:01:11 -0800
--------
On Tue, 01 Mar 2005 09:29:11 -0500, "Rev. Ivan Stang"
wrote:
>I hope with practice to get to the point where I can talk for TWO hours
>and yet say NOTHING AT ALL.
and that would be different from Hour of Slack? (duck)
--
Zapanaz
International Satanic Conspiracy
Customer Support Specialist
http://joecosby.com/
A pessimist is one who feels bad when he feels good for fear he'll feel worse when he feels better.
Posted by:: nenslo Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 10:39:19 -0800
--------
"Rev. Ivan Stang" wrote:
>
> In article , Rev
> Chain Smerker wrote:
>
> > "nenslo" wrote in message
> > news:42241BF0.1760EA7E@yahoox.com...
> > > Even though it is excessively simple, or perhaps because it is, this is
> > > one of the most difficult concepts for many to grasp. The SubGenius
> > > must HAVE slack. Not get, find, be given, deserve, locate or borrow.
> > > HAVE. Have means only one thing. You can't sort of have slack. You
> > > can't have SOME slack or a lot of slack or a medium amount of slack or
> > > any quantity of slack because slack is not quantitative. Either you
> > > have it or you don't. The SubGenius must have slack. You either have
> > > it or you don't. Having slack isn't what makes you a SubGenius. Being
> > > a SubGenius is what makes you have slack.
> > >
> > > I didn't just invent this. It is not a debatable point. If your idea
> > > is different from this, your idea is wrong.
> >
> > I disagree, the idea of slack actually is anti-slack!, if you think that you
> > have slack how can you have true slack? and how the hell can anyone "have"
> > slack, its an impossibility
> >
> > On anther note Slack just seems to be a rip-off of the Zen term Samadi
> > (excuse my spelling) its a load of crap that doesnt work in REAL life, and
> > the ultimate slack master J R "Bob" Dobbs is a fucking prick and full of
> > ANTI-SLACK and he should be killed as the OTHER subgenius rip-off saying
> > goes (If you meet "BoB" kill him) which is of course a rip-off of the Zen
> > saying "if you meet the Buddha kill him"
> >
>
> You guys!
>
> A *REAL* SubGenius (like *ME,* ahem, ahum) can talk for an HOUR about
> Slack and NEVER ONCE say what it is!
I am always careful to try to define the word in terms of what slack is
NOT, and what is NOT slack. The things that get these dumbasses all
flipped out and reactionary and feeling persecuted and abused, are
simply things which I am repeating from having read them in the books or
from hearing you say them. They think this is some kind of free for all
orgy of general penis-poking and get right tetchy if you point out to
them that where they are poking their penis isn't actually a hole or
even a flesh-fold but a bony protuberance, and then clearly point out to
them a big soft hole just drooling for a good poke and they are all like
"Don't INSULT me like that!" Death to them all.
Posted by:: Zapanaz Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 12:05:03 -0800
--------
On Tue, 01 Mar 2005 10:39:19 -0800, nenslo wrote:
>"Rev. Ivan Stang" wrote:
>>
>> In article , Rev
>> Chain Smerker wrote:
>>
>> > "nenslo" wrote in message
>> > news:42241BF0.1760EA7E@yahoox.com...
>> > > Even though it is excessively simple, or perhaps because it is, this is
>> > > one of the most difficult concepts for many to grasp. The SubGenius
>> > > must HAVE slack. Not get, find, be given, deserve, locate or borrow.
>> > > HAVE. Have means only one thing. You can't sort of have slack. You
>> > > can't have SOME slack or a lot of slack or a medium amount of slack or
>> > > any quantity of slack because slack is not quantitative. Either you
>> > > have it or you don't. The SubGenius must have slack. You either have
>> > > it or you don't. Having slack isn't what makes you a SubGenius. Being
>> > > a SubGenius is what makes you have slack.
>> > >
>> > > I didn't just invent this. It is not a debatable point. If your idea
>> > > is different from this, your idea is wrong.
>> >
>> > I disagree, the idea of slack actually is anti-slack!, if you think that you
>> > have slack how can you have true slack? and how the hell can anyone "have"
>> > slack, its an impossibility
>> >
>> > On anther note Slack just seems to be a rip-off of the Zen term Samadi
>> > (excuse my spelling) its a load of crap that doesnt work in REAL life, and
>> > the ultimate slack master J R "Bob" Dobbs is a fucking prick and full of
>> > ANTI-SLACK and he should be killed as the OTHER subgenius rip-off saying
>> > goes (If you meet "BoB" kill him) which is of course a rip-off of the Zen
>> > saying "if you meet the Buddha kill him"
>> >
>>
>> You guys!
>>
>> A *REAL* SubGenius (like *ME,* ahem, ahum) can talk for an HOUR about
>> Slack and NEVER ONCE say what it is!
>
>I am always careful to try to define the word in terms of what slack is
>NOT, and what is NOT slack. The things that get these dumbasses all
>flipped out and reactionary and feeling persecuted and abused, are
>simply things which I am repeating from having read them in the books or
>from hearing you say them. They think this is some kind of free for all
>orgy of general penis-poking and get right tetchy if you point out to
>them that where they are poking their penis isn't actually a hole or
>even a flesh-fold but a bony protuberance, and then clearly point out to
>them a big soft hole just drooling for a good poke and they are all like
>"Don't INSULT me like that!" Death to them all.
death to -everything-. People. plants, animals. Bacteria. A
sterile world is a quiet, pleasant world.
--
Zapanaz
International Satanic Conspiracy
Customer Support Specialist
http://joecosby.com/
Great News: Ignorance Is Still Bliss
Oh, I dunno about that. Every time I manage to discard an Ignorance
module, I tend to feel somewhere between "somewhat" and "One whole fuck
of a LOT" BETTER, even if that knowledge requires me to kick someone in
the privates with a steel-tipped toe cap. Its not personal; I'm just
following my bliss, GOOMPH!
--
HellPope Huey
I like to gouge wattled matrons with sporks
I do not have a psychiatrist
and I do not want one,
for the simple reason
that if he listened to me long enough,
he might become disturbed.
~ "Carpe Noctem, If You Can",
Credos and Curios
My father had a profound influence on me.
He was a lunatic.
~ Spike Milligan
Posted by:: Frere Jean Bleu Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 12:34:08 +1100
--------
On Tue, 01 Mar 2005 09:29:11 -0500, "Rev. Ivan Stang"
wrote:
>In article , Rev
>Chain Smerker wrote:
>
>> "nenslo" wrote in message
>> news:42241BF0.1760EA7E@yahoox.com...
>> > Even though it is excessively simple, or perhaps because it is, this is
>> > one of the most difficult concepts for many to grasp. The SubGenius
>> > must HAVE slack. Not get, find, be given, deserve, locate or borrow.
>> > HAVE. Have means only one thing. You can't sort of have slack. You
>> > can't have SOME slack or a lot of slack or a medium amount of slack or
>> > any quantity of slack because slack is not quantitative. Either you
>> > have it or you don't. The SubGenius must have slack. You either have
>> > it or you don't. Having slack isn't what makes you a SubGenius. Being
>> > a SubGenius is what makes you have slack.
>> >
>> > I didn't just invent this. It is not a debatable point. If your idea
>> > is different from this, your idea is wrong.
>>
>> I disagree, the idea of slack actually is anti-slack!, if you think that you
>> have slack how can you have true slack? and how the hell can anyone "have"
>> slack, its an impossibility
>>
>> On anther note Slack just seems to be a rip-off of the Zen term Samadi
>> (excuse my spelling) its a load of crap that doesnt work in REAL life, and
>> the ultimate slack master J R "Bob" Dobbs is a fucking prick and full of
>> ANTI-SLACK and he should be killed as the OTHER subgenius rip-off saying
>> goes (If you meet "BoB" kill him) which is of course a rip-off of the Zen
>> saying "if you meet the Buddha kill him"
>>
>
>You guys!
>
>A *REAL* SubGenius (like *ME,* ahem, ahum) can talk for an HOUR about
>Slack and NEVER ONCE say what it is!
>
>Amateurs.
>
>I hope with practice to get to the point where I can talk for TWO hours
>and yet say NOTHING AT ALL.
Those who speak of Slack KNOW NOT, those who say nothing KNOW
--------
In article <1o5a21t1nn9dage57990in391k61mgk4ki@4ax.com>,
Frere Jean Bleu wrote:
> Those who speak of Slack KNOW NOT, those who say nothing KNOW
and those who sit in the middle get their damn ass run over by logging
trucks driven by those who don't give a rat's either way. Hell of a
thing, huh?
--
HellPope Huey
I like to gouge wattled matrons with sporks
I do not have a psychiatrist
and I do not want one,
for the simple reason
that if he listened to me long enough,
he might become disturbed.
~ "Carpe Noctem, If You Can",
Credos and Curios
My father had a profound influence on me.
He was a lunatic.
~ Spike Milligan
Posted by:: König Prüße, GfbAEV Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 03:15:23 GMT
--------
HellPope Huey wrote:
> HellPope Huey
> I like to gouge wattled matrons with sporks
--------
In article ,
König Prüße, GfbAEV wrote:
> HellPope Huey wrote:
>
> > I like to gouge wattled matrons with sporks
>
> Me too! And kick their poodles!
So let's do lunch and mess up some old biddies. The greater their age,
the more likely they are to be severely retarded in the areas of
religion and Everything Else, so they are fun targets. They holler like
anything when you poke 'em... kinda like angelicus whatsit or people
from alt.tasteless who get their Underoos in a knot when you crosspost.
Bring a metal spork, it'll be a busy day.
--
HellPope Huey
Yeah, I know it all,
but its on SmartMedia cards
in my other pants
"If you make people think they're thinking,
they'll love you;
but, if you really make them think,
they'll hate you."
- Harlan Ellison
If a donkey bray at you, don't bray at him.
- George Herbert
--------
On Wed, 02 Mar 2005 05:49:31 GMT, HellPope Huey
wrote:
> So let's do lunch and mess up some old biddies. The greater their age,
>the more likely they are to be severely retarded in the areas of
>religion and Everything Else, so they are fun targets. They holler like
>anything when you poke 'em... kinda like angelicus whatsit or people
>from alt.tasteless who get their Underoos in a knot when you crosspost.
Get your withered gums round my rancid knob-end, Huey. I let you
ramble on with your demented rubbish without a word of protest and
this is the thanks I get.
I seem to remember that when I had a poke at the drooling, witless
habitues of slack a couple of years ago, you squealed like a convent
girlie with her first sight of an erect champer.
>Bring a metal spork, it'll be a busy day.
Nah. You'll be eating your lunch through a straw, as usual.
--
Sem
Posted by:: König Prüße, GfbAEV Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 13:06:19 GMT
--------
Semolina Pilchard wrote:
>On Wed, 02 Mar 2005 05:49:31 GMT, HellPope Huey
> wrote:
>
>> So let's do lunch and mess up some old biddies. The greater their age,
>>the more likely they are to be severely retarded in the areas of
>>religion and Everything Else, so they are fun targets. They holler like
>>anything when you poke 'em... kinda like angelicus whatsit or people
>>from alt.tasteless who get their Underoos in a knot when you crosspost.
>
>Get your withered gums round my rancid knob-end, Huey. I let you
>ramble on with your demented rubbish without a word of protest and
>this is the thanks I get.
>
>I seem to remember that when I had a poke at the drooling, witless
>habitues of slack a couple of years ago, you squealed like a convent
>girlie with her first sight of an erect champer.
>
>>Bring a metal spork, it'll be a busy day.
>
>Nah. You'll be eating your lunch through a straw, as usual.
>--
>Sem
>
Ahoy, you over on the other side of the Big Pond!
How's tricks in Jolly Old? Care for a cup o' char?
How's the Queen's knickers, also? You got any
bubbles&squeeks? How's your kidney pie? And
the pub? How are all the lads at the pub? Still throwing
the darts, eh? How's your wicket? Sticky, I'll wager!
And last but not least, how's your gulliver? More fun
than a brolly up the bum, wot!?!? Ya cod! Yer gormless!
Posted by:: U. M. Zaporets Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2005 20:36:02 -0700
--------
On Wed, 02 Mar 2005 13:06:19 GMT, König Prüße, GfbAEV
wrote:
>
> Ahoy, you over on the other side of the Big Pond!
>How's tricks in Jolly Old? Care for a cup o' char?
>How's the Queen's knickers, also? You got any
>bubbles&squeeks? How's your kidney pie? And
>the pub? How are all the lads at the pub? Still throwing
>the darts, eh? How's your wicket? Sticky, I'll wager!
>And last but not least, how's your gulliver? More fun
>than a brolly up the bum, wot!?!? Ya cod! Yer gormless!
>
I don't care if he's Prussian royalty or not. Have this one killed!
Posted by:: König Prüße, GfbAEV Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2005 04:46:53 GMT
--------
U. M. Zaporets wrote:
>On Wed, 02 Mar 2005 13:06:19 GMT, König Prüße, GfbAEV
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Ahoy, you over on the other side of the Big Pond!
>>How's tricks in Jolly Old? Care for a cup o' char?
>>How's the Queen's knickers, also? You got any
>>bubbles&squeeks? How's your kidney pie? And
>>the pub? How are all the lads at the pub? Still throwing
>>the darts, eh? How's your wicket? Sticky, I'll wager!
>>And last but not least, how's your gulliver? More fun
>>than a brolly up the bum, wot!?!? Ya cod! Yer gormless!
>>
>
>I don't care if he's Prussian royalty or not. Have this one killed!
>
>
Do it yourself, numbnutz!
And pack a lunch, 'cuz it might take you a while.
Posted by:: U. M. Zaporets Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2005 21:49:28 -0700
--------
On Sun, 06 Mar 2005 04:46:53 GMT, König Prüße, GfbAEV
wrote:
>
> Do it yourself, numbnutz!
>And pack a lunch, 'cuz it might take you a while.
>
I'm English. Generally I'd expect other people do my dirty work for
me.
Posted by:: Michael Briel Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2005 21:00:16 +0100
--------
U. M. Zaporets wrote:
> On Sun, 06 Mar 2005 04:46:53 GMT, König Prüße, GfbAEV
> wrote:
>>Do it yourself, numbnutz!
>>And pack a lunch, 'cuz it might take you a while.
> I'm English. Generally I'd expect other people do my dirty work for
> me.
Whatever you are, that "König Prüße" *defenitely* isn't German, or he
weuld know that in the case of the Prussians the "eu" doesn't transcribe
into an "ü" at all. And "weinerschnitzle"... Sigh...
Michael Briel - www.brielmusik.de
--
"Lord, please make me the kind of person my dog thinks I am."
> Get your withered gums round my rancid knob-end, Huey. I let you
> ramble on with your demented rubbish without a word of protest and
> this is the thanks I get.
>> I seem to remember that when I had a poke at the drooling, witless
> habitues of slack a couple of years ago, you squealed like a convent
> girlie with her first sight of an erect champer.
I see you are still brimming with vitriol to such a degree that you
forgot to reset your killfile. Thus, I "win" by default, although I
don't really have a use for a pack of pee-soaked Dunhills and a baggie
of your hoof-stamping outrage. No, wait, Nenslo's birthday is coming up.
Okay, send it along.
--
HellPope Huey
Yeah, I know it all,
but its on SmartMedia cards
in my other pants
"If you make people think they're thinking,
they'll love you;
but, if you really make them think,
they'll hate you."
- Harlan Ellison
If a donkey bray at you, don't bray at him.
- George Herbert
--------
On Wed, 02 Mar 2005 17:09:56 GMT, HellPope Huey
wrote:
> I see you are still brimming with vitriol to such a degree that you
>forgot to reset your killfile. Thus, I "win" by default, although I
>don't really have a use for a pack of pee-soaked Dunhills and a baggie
>of your hoof-stamping outrage. No, wait, Nenslo's birthday is coming up.
>Okay, send it along.
I'm pleased for you that you still have the mental agility to convince
yourself that you've "won", even if it is on a technicality. That's
pretty good going for a toothless (literally and figuratively) old
queen like you. That reminds me, I'm still waiting for my blow job.
Roll the ol' foreskin back a bit there, Huey. I've saved about a
month's worth of smegma for you, knowing how fond you are of cock
caviar.
Incidentally, one of your monkeys appears to have escaped. The Konig
one. I can hear him gibbering inanely. Pop him back in his cage
before he hurts himself. There's a good little FuckPope.
--
Sem
--------
In article <4kvb21h3jkvo4t5t5v1ldo6b31jguc6mq9@4ax.com>,
Semolina Pilchard wrote:
> Roll the ol' foreskin back a bit there, Huey. I've saved about a
> month's worth of smegma for you, knowing how fond you are of cock
> caviar.
See, smegma retention is part of why your party invitations dried up.
> Incidentally, one of your monkeys appears to have escaped. The Konig
> one. I can hear him gibbering inanely. Pop him back in his cage
> before he hurts himself. There's a good little FuckPope.
He's not MY monkey. He is a completely autonomous biped, as far as I
know, so while I applaud his decision to crap in your shoe, its not due
to any personal training on my part. He is an instrument of death and
"Bob" kills through him, but his debaucheries are completely his own.
--
HellPope Huey
Yeah, verily, I say unto you,
stomp ye not the flaming fudge bag,
keepeth thy shoes pure.
Humor has as big a fist as any other form
or maybe bigger.
~ James Thurber
"It looks like Bob knows something
the other team doesn't!"
- Enzyte commercial
Posted by:: König Prüße, GfbAEV Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 20:13:20 GMT
--------
HellPope Huey wrote:
>In article <4kvb21h3jkvo4t5t5v1ldo6b31jguc6mq9@4ax.com>,
> Semolina Pilchard wrote:
>
>> Roll the ol' foreskin back a bit there, Huey. I've saved about a
>> month's worth of smegma for you, knowing how fond you are of cock
>> caviar.
>
> See, smegma retention is part of why your party invitations dried up.
>
>> Incidentally, one of your monkeys appears to have escaped. The Konig
>> one. I can hear him gibbering inanely. Pop him back in his cage
>> before he hurts himself. There's a good little FuckPope.
>
> He's not MY monkey. He is a completely autonomous biped, as far as I
>know, so while I applaud his decision to crap in your shoe, its not due
>to any personal training on my part. He is an instrument of death and
>"Bob" kills through him, but his debaucheries are completely his own.
>
>--
> See, smegma retention is part of why your party invitations dried up.
Probably I should reduce the misguided humour a little at this point
and revert to honesty. Actually, I'm not homosexual and I don't want
you to suck my dick. I just couldn't get it up for a raddled old
floozie like you. The only way you could arouse me is if I stamped
your features into an an undifferentiated mush of blood and gristle.
Don't take that personally. I would feel the same about *any* slacker
called HellPope Huey.
Now that we have that out of the way, let's get back to the smegma.
Any *real* woman will snack on crusty, festering smegma like it was
the finest of gruyere, slobbering and moaning her appreciation. Those
hypersensitive bitches who choke and retch over the chunky bits just
get slapped until they get over it. After about the fourth slap, when
her face is red and wet with tears, it really begins to sting and they
learn to like the ol' crunchy cock-boogers pretty quick. Just like
training a dog, really, except the women suck cock better because
their lips are bigger. Especially if you routinely crack 'em in the
mouth a couple of times as preparation.
> He's not MY monkey. He is a completely autonomous biped, as far as I
>know, so while I applaud his decision to crap in your shoe, its not due
>to any personal training on my part. He is an instrument of death and
>"Bob" kills through him, but his debaucheries are completely his own.
OK. Fine. If he's just a stray we'll fuck him first and then fling
him on the barbecue. Monkey's prime eating.
--
Sem
Posted by:: brthrn@dangermedia.org
Date: 2 Mar 2005 14:07:21 -0800
--------
It's amazing how any of you make it through the day without ending up a
mercy killing.
Posted by:: König Prüße, GfbAEV Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 23:36:51 GMT
--------
Semolina Pilchard wrote:
>On Wed, 02 Mar 2005 20:06:38 GMT, HellPope Huey
> wrote:
>
>>In article <4kvb21h3jkvo4t5t5v1ldo6b31jguc6mq9@4ax.com>,
>> Semolina Pilchard wrote:
>
>> See, smegma retention is part of why your party invitations dried up.
>
>Probably I should reduce the misguided humour a little at this point
>and revert to honesty. Actually, I'm not homosexual and I don't want
>you to suck my dick. I just couldn't get it up for a raddled old
>floozie like you. The only way you could arouse me is if I stamped
>your features into an an undifferentiated mush of blood and gristle.
>Don't take that personally. I would feel the same about *any* slacker
>called HellPope Huey.
>
>Now that we have that out of the way, let's get back to the smegma.
>Any *real* woman will snack on crusty, festering smegma like it was
>the finest of gruyere, slobbering and moaning her appreciation. Those
>hypersensitive bitches who choke and retch over the chunky bits just
>get slapped until they get over it. After about the fourth slap, when
>her face is red and wet with tears, it really begins to sting and they
>learn to like the ol' crunchy cock-boogers pretty quick. Just like
>training a dog, really, except the women suck cock better because
>their lips are bigger. Especially if you routinely crack 'em in the
>mouth a couple of times as preparation.
>
>> He's not MY monkey. He is a completely autonomous biped, as far as I
>>know, so while I applaud his decision to crap in your shoe, its not due
>>to any personal training on my part. He is an instrument of death and
>>"Bob" kills through him, but his debaucheries are completely his own.
>
>OK. Fine. If he's just a stray we'll fuck him first and then fling
>him on the barbecue. Monkey's prime eating.
> Probably I should reduce the misguided humour a little at this point
> and revert to honesty. Actually, I'm not homosexual and I don't want
> you to suck my dick. I just couldn't get it up for a raddled old
> floozie like you. The only way you could arouse me is if I stamped
> your features into an an undifferentiated mush of blood and gristle.
> Don't take that personally. I would feel the same about *any* slacker
> called HellPope Huey.
Oh, okay, that's different. BTW, if you wash down your Depakote with 12
ounces of bleach, it will work WAY better.
Besides, we are in accordance in one area: lips that touch penises
shall never touch mine. Um... waitaminnit... oh hell.
--
HellPope Huey
Yeah, verily, I say unto you,
stomp ye not the flaming fudge bag,
keepeth thy shoes pure.
Humor has as big a fist as any other form
or maybe bigger.
~ James Thurber
"It looks like Bob knows something
the other team doesn't!"
- Enzyte commercial
--------
nenslo wrote:
> Even though it is excessively simple, or perhaps because it is, this
> is one of the most difficult concepts for many to grasp. The
> SubGenius must HAVE slack. Not get, find, be given, deserve, locate
> or borrow. HAVE. Have means only one thing. You can't sort of have
> slack. You can't have SOME slack or a lot of slack or a medium
> amount of slack or any quantity of slack because slack is not
> quantitative. Either you have it or you don't. The SubGenius must
> have slack. You either have it or you don't. Having slack isn't
> what makes you a SubGenius. Being a SubGenius is what makes you have
> slack.
>
> I didn't just invent this. It is not a debatable point. If your idea
> is different from this, your idea is wrong.
I agree with this post. However I don't think the emphasis should be on
"HAVE," it should be on "MUST".
Like if your spouse says to you "Why won't you run down to the post
office and buy stamps?" or "Why are you dragging me to see a giant
model of the human colon?" or "Why do you taunt people on the internet?"
or some such thing, it is utterly scientifically and morally correct to
reply, "Because I MUST have Slack!"
--
FACT!!
Posted by:: König Prüße, GfbAEV Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 08:36:33 GMT
--------
"Rev Magdalen" wrote:
>nenslo wrote:
>> Even though it is excessively simple, or perhaps because it is, this
>> is one of the most difficult concepts for many to grasp. The
>> SubGenius must HAVE slack. Not get, find, be given, deserve, locate
>> or borrow. HAVE. Have means only one thing. You can't sort of have
>> slack. You can't have SOME slack or a lot of slack or a medium
>> amount of slack or any quantity of slack because slack is not
>> quantitative. Either you have it or you don't. The SubGenius must
>> have slack. You either have it or you don't. Having slack isn't
>> what makes you a SubGenius. Being a SubGenius is what makes you have
>> slack.
>>
>> I didn't just invent this. It is not a debatable point. If your idea
>> is different from this, your idea is wrong.
>
>I agree with this post. However I don't think the emphasis should be on
>"HAVE," it should be on "MUST".
>
>Like if your spouse says to you "Why won't you run down to the post
>office and buy stamps?" or "Why are you dragging me to see a giant
>model of the human colon?" or "Why do you taunt people on the internet?"
>or some such thing, it is utterly scientifically and morally correct to
>reply, "Because I MUST have Slack!"
>
>--
>FACT!!
>
>
Well... "I MUST have stamps!"
No...send the letter, it'll likely get there Postage Due.
There are slack thieves like that, and psychic vampires,
and AmWay Salesmen. Oh, my!
--------
GfbAEV wrote:
> "Rev Magdalen" wrote:
>
>> nenslo wrote:
>>> Even though it is excessively simple, or perhaps because it is, this
>>> is one of the most difficult concepts for many to grasp. The
>>> SubGenius must HAVE slack. Not get, find, be given, deserve, locate
>>> or borrow. HAVE. Have means only one thing. You can't sort of have
>>> slack. You can't have SOME slack or a lot of slack or a medium
>>> amount of slack or any quantity of slack because slack is not
>>> quantitative. Either you have it or you don't. The SubGenius must
>>> have slack. You either have it or you don't. Having slack isn't
>>> what makes you a SubGenius. Being a SubGenius is what makes you
>>> have slack.
>>>
>>> I didn't just invent this. It is not a debatable point. If your
>>> idea is different from this, your idea is wrong.
>>
>> I agree with this post. However I don't think the emphasis should
>> be on "HAVE," it should be on "MUST".
>>
>> Like if your spouse says to you "Why won't you run down to the post
>> office and buy stamps?" or "Why are you dragging me to see a giant
>> model of the human colon?" or "Why do you taunt people on the
>> internet?" or some such thing, it is utterly scientifically and
>> morally correct to reply, "Because I MUST have Slack!"
>>
>> --
>> FACT!!
>>
>>
>
> Well... "I MUST have stamps!"
I'm sorry, "The SubGenius Must Have Stamps" is not in the scriptures.
--
FACT!!
Posted by:: König Prüße, GfbAEV Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 09:13:20 GMT
--------
"Rev Magdalen" wrote:
>GfbAEV wrote:
>> "Rev Magdalen" wrote:
>>
>>> nenslo wrote:
>>>> Even though it is excessively simple, or perhaps because it is, this
>>>> is one of the most difficult concepts for many to grasp. The
>>>> SubGenius must HAVE slack. Not get, find, be given, deserve, locate
>>>> or borrow. HAVE. Have means only one thing. You can't sort of have
>>>> slack. You can't have SOME slack or a lot of slack or a medium
>>>> amount of slack or any quantity of slack because slack is not
>>>> quantitative. Either you have it or you don't. The SubGenius must
>>>> have slack. You either have it or you don't. Having slack isn't
>>>> what makes you a SubGenius. Being a SubGenius is what makes you
>>>> have slack.
>>>>
>>>> I didn't just invent this. It is not a debatable point. If your
>>>> idea is different from this, your idea is wrong.
>>>
>>> I agree with this post. However I don't think the emphasis should
>>> be on "HAVE," it should be on "MUST".
>>>
>>> Like if your spouse says to you "Why won't you run down to the post
>>> office and buy stamps?" or "Why are you dragging me to see a giant
>>> model of the human colon?" or "Why do you taunt people on the
>>> internet?" or some such thing, it is utterly scientifically and
>>> morally correct to reply, "Because I MUST have Slack!"
>>>
>>> --
>>> FACT!!
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Well... "I MUST have stamps!"
>
>I'm sorry, "The SubGenius Must Have Stamps" is not in the scriptures.
>
>--
>FACT!!
>
>
S'ok...I like stamps, commorative bat stamps, AmerInd stamps,
antique toy stamps; but I also realize they aren't necessary.
Just mini-posters
Posted by:: "Rev. Ivan Stang" Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 09:37:08 -0500
--------
In article ,
König Prüße, GfbAEV wrote:
> "Rev Magdalen" wrote:
>
> >GfbAEV wrote:
> >> "Rev Magdalen" wrote:
> >>
> >>> nenslo wrote:
> >>>> Even though it is excessively simple, or perhaps because it is, this
> >>>> is one of the most difficult concepts for many to grasp. The
> >>>> SubGenius must HAVE slack. Not get, find, be given, deserve, locate
> >>>> or borrow. HAVE. Have means only one thing. You can't sort of have
> >>>> slack. You can't have SOME slack or a lot of slack or a medium
> >>>> amount of slack or any quantity of slack because slack is not
> >>>> quantitative. Either you have it or you don't. The SubGenius must
> >>>> have slack. You either have it or you don't. Having slack isn't
> >>>> what makes you a SubGenius. Being a SubGenius is what makes you
> >>>> have slack.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> I agree with this post. However I don't think the emphasis should
> >>> be on "HAVE," it should be on "MUST".
> >>>
> >>> Like if your spouse says to you "Why won't you run down to the post
> >>> office and buy stamps?" or "Why are you dragging me to see a giant
> >>> model of the human colon?" or "Why do you taunt people on the
> >>> internet?" or some such thing, it is utterly scientifically and
> >>> morally correct to reply, "Because I MUST have Slack!"
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> FACT!!
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> Well... "I MUST have stamps!"
> >
> >I'm sorry, "The SubGenius Must Have Stamps" is not in the scriptures.
> >
> >--
> >FACT!!
> >
> >
>
> S'ok...I like stamps, commorative bat stamps, AmerInd stamps,
> antique toy stamps; but I also realize they aren't necessary.
>
> Just mini-posters
>
>
You people are getting away from the main issue.
I think the emphasis is on the "THE." THE SubGenius Must Have Slack.
*THE* obviously means THE specific individual SubGenius organism doing
the having. Since each SubGenius has a completely, oftimes
diametrically opposed and mutually negating Slack, the "Slack" part of
the equation is actually a variable which depends entirely on which
SubGenius "THE" refers to.
I guess none of you people paid much attention in math class.
--
The SubGenius Foundation, Inc.
(4th Stangian Orthodox MegaFisTemple Lodge of the Wrath of Dobbs Yeti,
Resurrected, Rev. Ivan Stang, prop.)
P.O. Box 181417, Cleveland, OH 44118 (fax 216-320-9528)
Dobbs-Approved Authorized Commercial Outreach of The Church of the SubGenius
SubSITE: http://www.subgenius.com PRABOB
Posted by:: König Prüße, GfbAEV Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 14:56:16 GMT
--------
"Rev. Ivan Stang" wrote:
>In article ,
>König Prüße, GfbAEV wrote:
>
>> "Rev Magdalen" wrote:
>>
>> >GfbAEV wrote:
>> >> "Rev Magdalen" wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> nenslo wrote:
>> >>>> Even though it is excessively simple, or perhaps because it is, this
>> >>>> is one of the most difficult concepts for many to grasp. The
>> >>>> SubGenius must HAVE slack. Not get, find, be given, deserve, locate
>> >>>> or borrow. HAVE. Have means only one thing. You can't sort of have
>> >>>> slack. You can't have SOME slack or a lot of slack or a medium
>> >>>> amount of slack or any quantity of slack because slack is not
>> >>>> quantitative. Either you have it or you don't. The SubGenius must
>> >>>> have slack. You either have it or you don't. Having slack isn't
>> >>>> what makes you a SubGenius. Being a SubGenius is what makes you
>> >>>> have slack.
>> >>>>
>
>> >>>
>> >>> I agree with this post. However I don't think the emphasis should
>> >>> be on "HAVE," it should be on "MUST".
>> >>>
>> >>> Like if your spouse says to you "Why won't you run down to the post
>> >>> office and buy stamps?" or "Why are you dragging me to see a giant
>> >>> model of the human colon?" or "Why do you taunt people on the
>> >>> internet?" or some such thing, it is utterly scientifically and
>> >>> morally correct to reply, "Because I MUST have Slack!"
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> FACT!!
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> Well... "I MUST have stamps!"
>> >
>> >I'm sorry, "The SubGenius Must Have Stamps" is not in the scriptures.
>> >
>> >--
>> >FACT!!
>> >
>> >
>>
>> S'ok...I like stamps, commorative bat stamps, AmerInd stamps,
>> antique toy stamps; but I also realize they aren't necessary.
>>
>> Just mini-posters
>>
>>
>
>You people are getting away from the main issue.
>
>I think the emphasis is on the "THE." THE SubGenius Must Have Slack.
>*THE* obviously means THE specific individual SubGenius organism doing
>the having. Since each SubGenius has a completely, oftimes
>diametrically opposed and mutually negating Slack, the "Slack" part of
>the equation is actually a variable which depends entirely on which
>SubGenius "THE" refers to.
>
>I guess none of you people paid much attention in math class.
>
>--
No, I get it! I get it!
It's all about the stamps!
The pretty, pretty commemorative stamps!
Posted by:: Zapanaz Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 09:02:41 -0800
--------
On Tue, 01 Mar 2005 09:37:08 -0500, "Rev. Ivan Stang"
wrote:
>In article ,
>König Prüße, GfbAEV wrote:
>
>> "Rev Magdalen" wrote:
>>
>> >GfbAEV wrote:
>> >> "Rev Magdalen" wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> nenslo wrote:
>> >>>> Even though it is excessively simple, or perhaps because it is, this
>> >>>> is one of the most difficult concepts for many to grasp. The
>> >>>> SubGenius must HAVE slack. Not get, find, be given, deserve, locate
>> >>>> or borrow. HAVE. Have means only one thing. You can't sort of have
>> >>>> slack. You can't have SOME slack or a lot of slack or a medium
>> >>>> amount of slack or any quantity of slack because slack is not
>> >>>> quantitative. Either you have it or you don't. The SubGenius must
>> >>>> have slack. You either have it or you don't. Having slack isn't
>> >>>> what makes you a SubGenius. Being a SubGenius is what makes you
>> >>>> have slack.
>> >>>>
>
>> >>>
>> >>> I agree with this post. However I don't think the emphasis should
>> >>> be on "HAVE," it should be on "MUST".
>> >>>
>> >>> Like if your spouse says to you "Why won't you run down to the post
>> >>> office and buy stamps?" or "Why are you dragging me to see a giant
>> >>> model of the human colon?" or "Why do you taunt people on the
>> >>> internet?" or some such thing, it is utterly scientifically and
>> >>> morally correct to reply, "Because I MUST have Slack!"
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> FACT!!
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> Well... "I MUST have stamps!"
>> >
>> >I'm sorry, "The SubGenius Must Have Stamps" is not in the scriptures.
>> >
>> >--
>> >FACT!!
>> >
>> >
>>
>> S'ok...I like stamps, commorative bat stamps, AmerInd stamps,
>> antique toy stamps; but I also realize they aren't necessary.
>>
>> Just mini-posters
>>
>>
>
>You people are getting away from the main issue.
>
>I think the emphasis is on the "THE." THE SubGenius Must Have Slack.
>*THE* obviously means THE specific individual SubGenius organism doing
>the having. Since each SubGenius has a completely, oftimes
>diametrically opposed and mutually negating Slack, the "Slack" part of
>the equation is actually a variable which depends entirely on which
>SubGenius "THE" refers to.
>
>I guess none of you people paid much attention in math class.
i vote the emphasis should be on SUB
--
Zapanaz
International Satanic Conspiracy
Customer Support Specialist
http://joecosby.com/
My time is a piece of wax, falling on a termite, that's choking on the
splinters
- Beck
And here I thought the emphasis was on the $30. What a ta-ra-ra-GOON-
dee-ay!
--
HellPope Huey
I like to gouge wattled matrons with sporks
I do not have a psychiatrist
and I do not want one,
for the simple reason
that if he listened to me long enough,
he might become disturbed.
~ "Carpe Noctem, If You Can",
Credos and Curios
My father had a profound influence on me.
He was a lunatic.
~ Spike Milligan
Posted by:: Frere Jean Bleu Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 11:48:23 +1100
--------
On Tue, 01 Mar 2005 09:02:41 -0800, Zapanaz
wrote:
>On Tue, 01 Mar 2005 09:37:08 -0500, "Rev. Ivan Stang"
> wrote:
>
>>In article ,
>>König Prüße, GfbAEV wrote:
>>
>>> "Rev Magdalen" wrote:
>>>
>>> >GfbAEV wrote:
>>> >> "Rev Magdalen" wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>> nenslo wrote:
>>> >>>> Even though it is excessively simple, or perhaps because it is, this
>>> >>>> is one of the most difficult concepts for many to grasp. The
>>> >>>> SubGenius must HAVE slack. Not get, find, be given, deserve, locate
>>> >>>> or borrow. HAVE. Have means only one thing. You can't sort of have
>>> >>>> slack. You can't have SOME slack or a lot of slack or a medium
>>> >>>> amount of slack or any quantity of slack because slack is not
>>> >>>> quantitative. Either you have it or you don't. The SubGenius must
>>> >>>> have slack. You either have it or you don't. Having slack isn't
>>> >>>> what makes you a SubGenius. Being a SubGenius is what makes you
>>> >>>> have slack.
>>> >>>>
>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> I agree with this post. However I don't think the emphasis should
>>> >>> be on "HAVE," it should be on "MUST".
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Like if your spouse says to you "Why won't you run down to the post
>>> >>> office and buy stamps?" or "Why are you dragging me to see a giant
>>> >>> model of the human colon?" or "Why do you taunt people on the
>>> >>> internet?" or some such thing, it is utterly scientifically and
>>> >>> morally correct to reply, "Because I MUST have Slack!"
>>> >>>
>>> >>> --
>>> >>> FACT!!
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >> Well... "I MUST have stamps!"
>>> >
>>> >I'm sorry, "The SubGenius Must Have Stamps" is not in the scriptures.
>>> >
>>> >--
>>> >FACT!!
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>> S'ok...I like stamps, commorative bat stamps, AmerInd stamps,
>>> antique toy stamps; but I also realize they aren't necessary.
>>>
>>> Just mini-posters
>>>
>>>
>>
>>You people are getting away from the main issue.
>>
>>I think the emphasis is on the "THE." THE SubGenius Must Have Slack.
>>*THE* obviously means THE specific individual SubGenius organism doing
>>the having. Since each SubGenius has a completely, oftimes
>>diametrically opposed and mutually negating Slack, the "Slack" part of
>>the equation is actually a variable which depends entirely on which
>>SubGenius "THE" refers to.
>>
>>I guess none of you people paid much attention in math class.
>
>i vote the emphasis should be on SUB
I sense a schism appearing.
In 2000 years there will be a tribe (a) who stated with the lineage of
"Bob". They will follow some old hippy guy who heard stuff coming from
a burning frop plant.They will be persecuted across the planet and
finally return to their land of Slack and Buldada where they will kick
out some people from group (c) who never left. Some of their kind will
live in the chief country of schism (b) where they will become
doctors, pornographers and movie makers.
Meanwhile one of the tribe of "Bob" via a "rumoured" virgin birth
between "Bob" and some chick..... will say it's pretty cool to be nice
to everyone else. Forming the new religion (b) Various schisms and
migrations will see an about face with a new nation formed, it will
be an enormous Militrary Industrial complex that supports the original
tribe (a) whilst not entirely reverting to their faith.
Another of the guys who knows of "Bob" will shack up with some rich
chick. Then come up with an ithe call from "Bob" via a magic fairy
from the sky. They will brand any other form of religion "infidels".
His followers will form schism (c)
(a) will fight (c) wil fight (b)
Meanwhile some guy will come from country (b) and come up with an
anti-religion with a guy called "God". Salvation for $30 or triple
your money back.
Fr J B
Posted by:: brthrn@dangermedia.org
Date: 2 Mar 2005 12:31:36 -0800
--------
yeh. And you're a jackass idiot.
Posted by:: Rev DJ Epoch Date: 2 Mar 2005 19:31:57 GMT
--------
"Rev. Ivan Stang" wrote in
news:010320050937081364%stang@subgeniusNOSPUM.com:
> In article ,
> König Prüße, GfbAEV wrote:
>
>> "Rev Magdalen" wrote:
>>
>> >GfbAEV wrote:
>> >> "Rev Magdalen" wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> nenslo wrote:
>> >>>> Even though it is excessively simple, or perhaps because it is,
this
>> >>>> is one of the most difficult concepts for many to grasp. The
>> >>>> SubGenius must HAVE slack. Not get, find, be given, deserve,
locate
>> >>>> or borrow. HAVE. Have means only one thing. You can't sort of
have
>> >>>> slack. You can't have SOME slack or a lot of slack or a medium
>> >>>> amount of slack or any quantity of slack because slack is not
>> >>>> quantitative. Either you have it or you don't. The SubGenius must
>> >>>> have slack. You either have it or you don't. Having slack isn't
>> >>>> what makes you a SubGenius. Being a SubGenius is what makes you
>> >>>> have slack.
>> >>>>
>
>> >>>
>> >>> I agree with this post. However I don't think the emphasis should
>> >>> be on "HAVE," it should be on "MUST".
>> >>>
>> >>> Like if your spouse says to you "Why won't you run down to the post
>> >>> office and buy stamps?" or "Why are you dragging me to see a giant
>> >>> model of the human colon?" or "Why do you taunt people on the
>> >>> internet?" or some such thing, it is utterly scientifically and
>> >>> morally correct to reply, "Because I MUST have Slack!"
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> FACT!!
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> Well... "I MUST have stamps!"
>> >
>> >I'm sorry, "The SubGenius Must Have Stamps" is not in the scriptures.
>> >
>> >--
>> >FACT!!
>> >
>> >
>>
>> S'ok...I like stamps, commorative bat stamps, AmerInd stamps,
>> antique toy stamps; but I also realize they aren't necessary.
>>
>> Just mini-posters
>>
>>
>
> You people are getting away from the main issue.
>
> I think the emphasis is on the "THE." THE SubGenius Must Have Slack.
> *THE* obviously means THE specific individual SubGenius organism doing
> the having. Since each SubGenius has a completely, oftimes
> diametrically opposed and mutually negating Slack, the "Slack" part of
> the equation is actually a variable which depends entirely on which
> SubGenius "THE" refers to.
>
> I guess none of you people paid much attention in math class.
>
Not since my instructor tried to tell us "Two and two is sometimes equal to
TWENTY TWO."
Eh... wouldn't just be easier to tell them "RTFM!"??
Ah hell, there I go stating the obvious again.
--
12th Epochalyptic Dungeon of The Church of Our Lady of Perpetual Motion
Cathedral, Carwash and Dancehall- Home of the Traci Lords Memorial Brothel
Rev. DJ Epoch - proprietor and janitor
Divine Southern Redneck Yeti Clench Recruitment site: http://revdjepoch.COM
"Yeah yeah. It's all fun and games until someone ingests a quantum
singularity and implodes!!"
-- DJ Epoch
"People from other countries are so goddamned foreign. I hope they stay
where they come from."
-- HellPope Huey
Posted by:: "Rev. Ivan Stang" Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 09:31:23 -0500
--------
In article , Rev Magdalen
wrote:
> GfbAEV wrote:
> > "Rev Magdalen" wrote:
> >
> >> nenslo wrote:
> >>> Even though it is excessively simple, or perhaps because it is, this
> >>> is one of the most difficult concepts for many to grasp. The
> >>> SubGenius must HAVE slack. Not get, find, be given, deserve, locate
> >>> or borrow. HAVE. Have means only one thing. You can't sort of have
> >>> slack. You can't have SOME slack or a lot of slack or a medium
> >>> amount of slack or any quantity of slack because slack is not
> >>> quantitative. Either you have it or you don't. The SubGenius must
> >>> have slack. You either have it or you don't. Having slack isn't
> >>> what makes you a SubGenius. Being a SubGenius is what makes you
> >>> have slack.
> >>>
> >>> I didn't just invent this. It is not a debatable point. If your
> >>> idea is different from this, your idea is wrong.
> >>
> >> I agree with this post. However I don't think the emphasis should
> >> be on "HAVE," it should be on "MUST".
> >>
> >> Like if your spouse says to you "Why won't you run down to the post
> >> office and buy stamps?" or "Why are you dragging me to see a giant
> >> model of the human colon?" or "Why do you taunt people on the
> >> internet?" or some such thing, it is utterly scientifically and
> >> morally correct to reply, "Because I MUST have Slack!"
> >>
> >> --
> >> FACT!!
> >>
> >>
> >
> > Well... "I MUST have stamps!"
>
> I'm sorry, "The SubGenius Must Have Stamps" is not in the scriptures.
--- Well, it is now. A SubGenius said it... it's scripture.
The Sacred Scribe Must have Stamps is also not only scriptural but
factually accurate almost all the time.
--
The SubGenius Foundation, Inc.
(4th Stangian Orthodox MegaFisTemple Lodge of the Wrath of Dobbs Yeti,
Resurrected, Rev. Ivan Stang, prop.)
P.O. Box 181417, Cleveland, OH 44118 (fax 216-320-9528)
Dobbs-Approved Authorized Commercial Outreach of The Church of the SubGenius
SubSITE: http://www.subgenius.com PRABOB
Posted by:: "just john" Date: 1 Mar 2005 07:20:04 -0800
--------
Rev Magdalen wrote:
>
> I'm sorry, "The SubGenius Must Have Stamps" is not in the scriptures.
>
> --
> FACT!!
Me, I'm kinda GLAD that it's not in the scriptures.
Posted by:: König Prüße, GfbAEV Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 15:58:26 GMT
--------
"just john" wrote:
>
>Rev Magdalen wrote:
>
>>
>> I'm sorry, "The SubGenius Must Have Stamps" is not in the scriptures.
>>
>> --
>> FACT!!
>
>
>Me, I'm kinda GLAD that it's not in the scriptures.
>
Me, too! So, if anyone says to me, "Honey, run down to the post office
and get me some stamps!" I can just say, "Take a flying fuck at a
rolling donut! Take a flying fuck at the moooooon!" No, that's a
different book. I'll just say, "It's not in the scriptures!"
Posted by:: Rev DJ Epoch Date: 2 Mar 2005 19:40:34 GMT
--------
König Prüße, GfbAEV wrote in
news:Ci0Vd.90318$Th1.87490@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net:
> "just john" wrote:
>
>>
>>Rev Magdalen wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I'm sorry, "The SubGenius Must Have Stamps" is not in the scriptures.
>>>
>>> --
>>> FACT!!
>>
>>
>>Me, I'm kinda GLAD that it's not in the scriptures.
>>
>
> Me, too! So, if anyone says to me, "Honey, run down to the post office
> and get me some stamps!" I can just say, "Take a flying fuck at a
> rolling donut! Take a flying fuck at the moooooon!" No, that's a
> different book. I'll just say, "It's not in the scriptures!"
>
> http://shop.usps.com/cgi-bin/vsbv/postal_store_non_ssl/home.jsp
>
>
You're too late... Stang just added it to the scriptures. He IS, after all,
the Sacred Scribe and his pen is mightier than your internet ravings. Once
pen is set to page in "HIS" book, your argument is moot. Which brings about
yet another "TRVTH" of the world of Dobbs:
"All rules are subject to change without notice"
Just like how I came to the party late, and MY salvation cost me an extra
$10. Oh well... I would have just drunk it away on a Friday night anyway.
--
12th Epochalyptic Dungeon of The Church of Our Lady of Perpetual Motion
Cathedral, Carwash and Dancehall- Home of the Traci Lords Memorial Brothel
Rev. DJ Epoch - proprietor and janitor
Divine Southern Redneck Yeti Clench Recruitment site: http://revdjepoch.COM
"Yeah yeah. It's all fun and games until someone ingests a quantum
singularity and implodes!!"
-- DJ Epoch
"People from other countries are so goddamned foreign. I hope they stay
where they come from."
-- HellPope Huey
Posted by:: König Prüße, GfbAEV Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 20:17:05 GMT
--------
Rev DJ Epoch wrote:
>König Prüße, GfbAEV wrote in
>news:Ci0Vd.90318$Th1.87490@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net:
>
>> "just john" wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>Rev Magdalen wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I'm sorry, "The SubGenius Must Have Stamps" is not in the scriptures.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> FACT!!
>>>
>>>
>>>Me, I'm kinda GLAD that it's not in the scriptures.
>>>
>>
>> Me, too! So, if anyone says to me, "Honey, run down to the post office
>> and get me some stamps!" I can just say, "Take a flying fuck at a
>> rolling donut! Take a flying fuck at the moooooon!" No, that's a
>> different book. I'll just say, "It's not in the scriptures!"
>>
>> http://shop.usps.com/cgi-bin/vsbv/postal_store_non_ssl/home.jsp
>>
>>
>
>You're too late... Stang just added it to the scriptures. He IS, after all,
>the Sacred Scribe and his pen is mightier than your internet ravings. Once
>pen is set to page in "HIS" book, your argument is moot. Which brings about
>yet another "TRVTH" of the world of Dobbs:
>
>"All rules are subject to change without notice"
>
>Just like how I came to the party late, and MY salvation cost me an extra
>$10. Oh well... I would have just drunk it away on a Friday night anyway.
>
>--
Ha! Watch this!
"The SubGenuis must have stumps!"
Now there will be a whole lot of quad-amps!
Posted by:: "just john" Date: 2 Mar 2005 12:20:17 -0800
--------
You thought you'd get some slack, but now you're STUMPED!
Posted by:: Rev DJ Epoch Date: 2 Mar 2005 21:56:04 GMT
--------
König Prüße, GfbAEV wrote in
news:5bpVd.312763$w62.165263@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net:
> Ha! Watch this!
>
> "The SubGenuis must have stumps!"
>
>
You duncecap-wearing choad weasel. DO YOU HAVE ANY IDEA HOW MANY OAK TREES
WILL *DIE* BECAUSE OF YOU??!?!
I just hope you're happy now, Ranger Smith.
--
12th Epochalyptic Dungeon of The Church of Our Lady of Perpetual Motion
Cathedral, Carwash and Dancehall- Home of the Traci Lords Memorial Brothel
Rev. DJ Epoch - proprietor and janitor
Divine Southern Redneck Yeti Clench Recruitment site: http://revdjepoch.COM
"Yeah yeah. It's all fun and games until someone ingests a quantum
singularity and implodes!!"
-- DJ Epoch
"People from other countries are so goddamned foreign. I hope they stay
where they come from."
-- HellPope Huey
> "All rules are subject to change without notice"
"Any failure to follow the rules will result in a penalty to be
administered by a nutcracker."
That's some pretty stiff penalizing for a group that scoffs at rules in
the first place.
--
HellPope Huey
Yeah, verily, I say unto you,
stomp ye not the flaming fudge bag,
keepeth thy shoes pure.
Humor has as big a fist as any other form
or maybe bigger.
~ James Thurber
"It looks like Bob knows something
the other team doesn't!"
- Enzyte commercial
Posted by:: Rev DJ Epoch Date: 3 Mar 2005 13:31:06 GMT
--------
HellPope Huey wrote in news:Grinningbastard-
9E3802.17451302032005@news1.west.earthlink.net:
> In article ,
> Rev DJ Epoch wrote:
>
>> "All rules are subject to change without notice"
>
> "Any failure to follow the rules will result in a penalty to be
> administered by a nutcracker."
>
> That's some pretty stiff penalizing for a group that scoffs at rules in
> the first place.
>
Yah, especially when rule #1 is "There are NO rules"!!
They wanted to move that to #12, but someone decided to make a point.
--
12th Epochalyptic Dungeon of The Church of Our Lady of Perpetual Motion
Cathedral, Carwash and Dancehall- Home of the Traci Lords Memorial Brothel
Rev. DJ Epoch - proprietor and janitor
Divine Southern Redneck Yeti Clench Recruitment site: http://revdjepoch.COM
> GfbAEV wrote:
> > "Rev Magdalen" wrote:
> >
> >> nenslo wrote:
> >>> Even though it is excessively simple, or perhaps because it is, this
> >>> is one of the most difficult concepts for many to grasp. The
> >>> SubGenius must HAVE slack. Not get, find, be given, deserve, locate
> >>> or borrow. HAVE. Have means only one thing. You can't sort of have
> >>> slack. You can't have SOME slack or a lot of slack or a medium
> >>> amount of slack or any quantity of slack because slack is not
> >>> quantitative. Either you have it or you don't. The SubGenius must
> >>> have slack. You either have it or you don't. Having slack isn't
> >>> what makes you a SubGenius. Being a SubGenius is what makes you
> >>> have slack.
> >>>
> >>> I didn't just invent this. It is not a debatable point. If your
> >>> idea is different from this, your idea is wrong.
> >>
> >> I agree with this post. However I don't think the emphasis should
> >> be on "HAVE," it should be on "MUST".
> >>
> >> Like if your spouse says to you "Why won't you run down to the post
> >> office and buy stamps?" or "Why are you dragging me to see a giant
> >> model of the human colon?" or "Why do you taunt people on the
> >> internet?" or some such thing, it is utterly scientifically and
> >> morally correct to reply, "Because I MUST have Slack!"
> >>
> >> --
> >> FACT!!
> >>
> >>
> >
> > Well... "I MUST have stamps!"
>
> I'm sorry, "The SubGenius Must Have Stamps" is not in the scriptures.
How about "The Subgenius Must Be Stamped Out?"
I don't mean eradicated, although that might not be a bad idea. I mean
"stamped out" like in an assembly line, where they're all made from the
same pattern. Like tiny robots or something.
pb
Posted by:: König Prüße, GfbAEV Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 11:52:58 GMT
--------
polar bear wrote:
>In article , "Rev Magdalen"
> wrote:
>
>> GfbAEV wrote:
>> > "Rev Magdalen" wrote:
>> >
>> >> nenslo wrote:
>> >>> Even though it is excessively simple, or perhaps because it is, this
>> >>> is one of the most difficult concepts for many to grasp. The
>> >>> SubGenius must HAVE slack. Not get, find, be given, deserve, locate
>> >>> or borrow. HAVE. Have means only one thing. You can't sort of have
>> >>> slack. You can't have SOME slack or a lot of slack or a medium
>> >>> amount of slack or any quantity of slack because slack is not
>> >>> quantitative. Either you have it or you don't. The SubGenius must
>> >>> have slack. You either have it or you don't. Having slack isn't
>> >>> what makes you a SubGenius. Being a SubGenius is what makes you
>> >>> have slack.
>> >>>
>> >>> I didn't just invent this. It is not a debatable point. If your
>> >>> idea is different from this, your idea is wrong.
>> >>
>> >> I agree with this post. However I don't think the emphasis should
>> >> be on "HAVE," it should be on "MUST".
>> >>
>> >> Like if your spouse says to you "Why won't you run down to the post
>> >> office and buy stamps?" or "Why are you dragging me to see a giant
>> >> model of the human colon?" or "Why do you taunt people on the
>> >> internet?" or some such thing, it is utterly scientifically and
>> >> morally correct to reply, "Because I MUST have Slack!"
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> FACT!!
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> > Well... "I MUST have stamps!"
>>
>> I'm sorry, "The SubGenius Must Have Stamps" is not in the scriptures.
>
>How about "The Subgenius Must Be Stamped Out?"
>
>I don't mean eradicated, although that might not be a bad idea. I mean
>"stamped out" like in an assembly line, where they're all made from the
>same pattern. Like tiny robots or something.
>
>pb
extruded
I sure feel extruded this morning.
Posted by:: "ArWeGod" Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 12:23:42 GMT
--------
; "GfbAEV" wrote in message
news:uOhVd.93160$Th1.24456@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> polar bear wrote:
>
> >In article , "Rev Magdalen"
> > wrote:
> >
> >> GfbAEV wrote:
> >> > "Rev Magdalen" wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> nenslo wrote:
> >> >>> Even though it is excessively simple, or perhaps because it is,
this
> >> >>> is one of the most difficult concepts for many to grasp. The
> >> >>> SubGenius must HAVE slack. Not get, find, be given, deserve,
locate
> >> >>> or borrow. HAVE. Have means only one thing. You can't sort of
have
> >> >>> slack. You can't have SOME slack or a lot of slack or a medium
> >> >>> amount of slack or any quantity of slack because slack is not
> >> >>> quantitative. Either you have it or you don't. The SubGenius
must
> >> >>> have slack. You either have it or you don't. Having slack
isn't
> >> >>> what makes you a SubGenius. Being a SubGenius is what makes
you
> >> >>> have slack.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> I didn't just invent this. It is not a debatable point. If
your
> >> >>> idea is different from this, your idea is wrong.
> >> >>
> >> >> I agree with this post. However I don't think the emphasis
should
> >> >> be on "HAVE," it should be on "MUST".
> >> >>
> >> >> Like if your spouse says to you "Why won't you run down to the
post
> >> >> office and buy stamps?" or "Why are you dragging me to see a
giant
> >> >> model of the human colon?" or "Why do you taunt people on the
> >> >> internet?" or some such thing, it is utterly scientifically and
> >> >> morally correct to reply, "Because I MUST have Slack!"
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> FACT!!
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > Well... "I MUST have stamps!"
> >>
> >> I'm sorry, "The SubGenius Must Have Stamps" is not in the
scriptures.
> >
> >How about "The Subgenius Must Be Stamped Out?"
> >
> >I don't mean eradicated, although that might not be a bad idea. I
mean
> >"stamped out" like in an assembly line, where they're all made from
the
> >same pattern. Like tiny robots or something.
> >
> >pb
>
> extruded
>
> I sure feel extruded this morning.
I prefer Injection Molding.
Besides, every time I try to lick these new stamps, they stick to my
tongue! What's up with that?!
--
ArWeTacky
Posted by:: brthrn@dangermedia.org
Date: 2 Mar 2005 12:30:27 -0800
--------
oh. Go fuck a little boy. Just how you want to. You hairy bitch.
Posted by:: brthrn@dangermedia.org
Date: 2 Mar 2005 12:30:28 -0800
--------
oh. Go fuck a little boy. Just how you want to. You hairy bitch.
Posted by:: nenslo Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 11:50:20 -0800
--------
Rev Magdalen wrote:
>
> nenslo wrote:
> > Even though it is excessively simple, or perhaps because it is, this
> > is one of the most difficult concepts for many to grasp. The
> > SubGenius must HAVE slack. Not get, find, be given, deserve, locate
> > or borrow. HAVE. Have means only one thing. You can't sort of have
> > slack. You can't have SOME slack or a lot of slack or a medium
> > amount of slack or any quantity of slack because slack is not
> > quantitative. Either you have it or you don't. The SubGenius must
> > have slack. You either have it or you don't. Having slack isn't
> > what makes you a SubGenius. Being a SubGenius is what makes you have
> > slack.
> >
> > I didn't just invent this. It is not a debatable point. If your idea
> > is different from this, your idea is wrong.
>
> I agree with this post. However I don't think the emphasis should be on
> "HAVE," it should be on "MUST".
>
> Like if your spouse says to you "Why won't you run down to the post
> office and buy stamps?" or "Why are you dragging me to see a giant
> model of the human colon?" or "Why do you taunt people on the internet?"
> or some such thing, it is utterly scientifically and morally correct to
> reply, "Because I MUST have Slack!"
>
The SubGenius must HAVE slack.
The SubGenius must have SLACK.
THE SubGenius must have slack.
The SUBGENIUS must have slack.
The SubGenius MUST have slack.
Ohm.
--
Rev. nu-monet
Founder and High Priest
Church of Kali, U.S.A. (Reformed)
The SubGenius must have a really strong, exceptional asshole, because
without it, s/he will explode horribly. Yes, even the worst Pink cannot
begin to brim with bullshit like the least of US, so that potent release
valve is extremely important. Mine is stainless steel.
--
HellPope Huey
I like to gouge wattled matrons with sporks
I do not have a psychiatrist
and I do not want one,
for the simple reason
that if he listened to me long enough,
he might become disturbed.
~ "Carpe Noctem, If You Can",
Credos and Curios
My father had a profound influence on me.
He was a lunatic.
~ Spike Milligan
Posted by:: Rev DJ Epoch Date: 2 Mar 2005 19:42:27 GMT
--------
HellPope Huey wrote in news:Grinningbastard-
ECC192.10315701032005@news1.west.earthlink.net:
>
> The SubGenius must have a really strong, exceptional asshole, because
> without it, s/he will explode horribly. Yes, even the worst Pink cannot
> begin to brim with bullshit like the least of US, so that potent release
> valve is extremely important. Mine is stainless steel.
>
But is it UL listed?
--
12th Epochalyptic Dungeon of The Church of Our Lady of Perpetual Motion
Cathedral, Carwash and Dancehall- Home of the Traci Lords Memorial Brothel
Rev. DJ Epoch - proprietor and janitor
Divine Southern Redneck Yeti Clench Recruitment site: http://revdjepoch.COM
"Yeah yeah. It's all fun and games until someone ingests a quantum
singularity and implodes!!"
-- DJ Epoch
"People from other countries are so goddamned foreign. I hope they stay where
they come from."
-- HellPope Huey
--------
In article ,
Rev DJ Epoch wrote:
> HellPope Huey wrote in news:Grinningbastard-
> ECC192.10315701032005@news1.west.earthlink.net:
> >
> > The SubGenius must have a really strong, exceptional asshole, because
> > without it, s/he will explode horribly. Yes, even the worst Pink cannot
> > begin to brim with bullshit like the least of US, so that potent release
> > valve is extremely important. Mine is stainless steel.
> >
> But is it UL listed?
UL, HELL! Its in "Toben's Big Book Of Who's Who and What's That."
--
HellPope Huey
Yeah, verily, I say unto you,
stomp ye not the flaming fudge bag,
keepeth thy shoes pure.
Humor has as big a fist as any other form
or maybe bigger.
~ James Thurber
"It looks like Bob knows something
the other team doesn't!"
- Enzyte commercial
Posted by:: Rev DJ Epoch Date: 3 Mar 2005 13:32:30 GMT
--------
HellPope Huey wrote in
news:Grinningbastard-E3666D.17460802032005@news1.west.earthlink.net:
> In article ,
> Rev DJ Epoch wrote:
>> HellPope Huey wrote in
>> news:Grinningbastard- ECC192.10315701032005@news1.west.earthlink.net:
>> >
>> > The SubGenius must have a really strong, exceptional asshole,
>> > because
>> > without it, s/he will explode horribly. Yes, even the worst Pink
>> > cannot begin to brim with bullshit like the least of US, so that
>> > potent release valve is extremely important. Mine is stainless steel.
>> >
>> >
>> But is it UL listed?
>
> UL, HELL! Its in "Toben's Big Book Of Who's Who and What's That."
>
And next week it'll be on the new Fox series: "Nenslo's Believe it or SHUT
UP!"
--
12th Epochalyptic Dungeon of The Church of Our Lady of Perpetual Motion
Cathedral, Carwash and Dancehall- Home of the Traci Lords Memorial Brothel
Rev. DJ Epoch - proprietor and janitor
Divine Southern Redneck Yeti Clench Recruitment site: http://revdjepoch.COM
"Yeah yeah. It's all fun and games until someone ingests a quantum
singularity and implodes!!"
-- DJ Epoch
"People from other countries are so goddamned foreign. I hope they stay
where they come from."
-- HellPope Huey
Posted by:: Zapanaz Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 18:29:51 -0800
--------
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 23:38:28 -0800, nenslo wrote:
>Even though it is excessively simple, or perhaps because it is, this is
>one of the most difficult concepts for many to grasp. The SubGenius
>must HAVE slack. Not get, find, be given, deserve, locate or borrow.
>HAVE. Have means only one thing. You can't sort of have slack. You
>can't have SOME slack or a lot of slack or a medium amount of slack or
>any quantity of slack because slack is not quantitative. Either you
>have it or you don't. The SubGenius must have slack. You either have
>it or you don't. Having slack isn't what makes you a SubGenius. Being
>a SubGenius is what makes you have slack.
>
>I didn't just invent this. It is not a debatable point. If your idea
>is different from this, your idea is wrong.
Well I agree totally that that is what being a subgenius WAS, that WAS
the dogma. "The Subgenius must have slack". But that was a long time
ago, that was like the 80's. Dogma has to change to fit the time.
The dogma now is "The Subgenius must be courteous and friendly". It's
like "The Subgenius must have slack" but just kinda UPDATED a little.
It's not a CHANGE, it's just REPHRASED in a more modern way, just to
account for changes in language. I mean let's face it, a lot of us
have to pump gas and work as greeters in department stores to stay
alive. I think being courteous and friendly to the customer has
always been one of the CORE VALUES of the Subgenius.
Another new dogma that should replace the out-of-date "The Subgenius
must have slack" is "The Subgenius should get to work on time in the
morning". Again, this isn't really a -change-, it's just brushing up
the language a little. Also "The Subgenius is always well-groomed and
cheerful".
I mean I think it's SO TOTALLY GREAT that we have LEGACY subgeniuses
like nenslo around. Don't get me WRONG. You guys MADE Subgenius what
it is. It's just not fair TO YOU that you have to do all the work.
You should be able to relax and let the younger subgeniuses take care
of BORING stuff like establishing dogma.
--
Zapanaz
International Satanic Conspiracy
Customer Support Specialist
http://joecosby.com/
"Because you can't cotton to evil. No sir. You have to smack evil on
the nose with the rolled-up newspaper of justice and say, 'Bad evil.
Bad, BAD evil.'"
- The Tick
Posted by:: Zapanaz Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 13:25:57 -0800
--------
On Tue, 01 Mar 2005 18:29:51 -0800, Zapanaz
wrote:
>On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 23:38:28 -0800, nenslo wrote:
>
>>Even though it is excessively simple, or perhaps because it is, this is
>>one of the most difficult concepts for many to grasp. The SubGenius
>>must HAVE slack. Not get, find, be given, deserve, locate or borrow.
>>HAVE. Have means only one thing. You can't sort of have slack. You
>>can't have SOME slack or a lot of slack or a medium amount of slack or
>>any quantity of slack because slack is not quantitative. Either you
>>have it or you don't. The SubGenius must have slack. You either have
>>it or you don't. Having slack isn't what makes you a SubGenius. Being
>>a SubGenius is what makes you have slack.
>>
>>I didn't just invent this. It is not a debatable point. If your idea
>>is different from this, your idea is wrong.
>
>Well I agree totally that that is what being a subgenius WAS, that WAS
>the dogma. "The Subgenius must have slack". But that was a long time
>ago, that was like the 80's. Dogma has to change to fit the time.
>
>The dogma now is "The Subgenius must be courteous and friendly". It's
>like "The Subgenius must have slack" but just kinda UPDATED a little.
>It's not a CHANGE, it's just REPHRASED in a more modern way, just to
>account for changes in language. I mean let's face it, a lot of us
>have to pump gas and work as greeters in department stores to stay
>alive. I think being courteous and friendly to the customer has
>always been one of the CORE VALUES of the Subgenius.
>
>Another new dogma that should replace the out-of-date "The Subgenius
>must have slack" is "The Subgenius should get to work on time in the
>morning". Again, this isn't really a -change-, it's just brushing up
>the language a little. Also "The Subgenius is always well-groomed and
>cheerful".
>
>I mean I think it's SO TOTALLY GREAT that we have LEGACY subgeniuses
>like nenslo around. Don't get me WRONG. You guys MADE Subgenius what
>it is. It's just not fair TO YOU that you have to do all the work.
>You should be able to relax and let the younger subgeniuses take care
>of BORING stuff like establishing dogma.
isn't ANYBODY going to kill me?
--
Zapanaz
International Satanic Conspiracy
Customer Support Specialist
http://joecosby.com/
I was told by a Professor of Education in class once that school
administrators cared about only two things: Image and Damage control.
Any attempts to get their attention have to be translated into those
terms.
Satyr
Posted by:: brthrn@dangermedia.org
Date: 2 Mar 2005 13:28:28 -0800
--------
Your quatiaTION IS stupid and meaning\lless.
Posted by:: Rev DJ Epoch Date: 2 Mar 2005 22:17:57 GMT
--------
Zapanaz wrote in
news:lqbc21ps5cdigfaugeqla7uq57l1mbrm4j@4ax.com:
> On Tue, 01 Mar 2005 18:29:51 -0800, Zapanaz
> wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 23:38:28 -0800, nenslo wrote:
>>
>>>Even though it is excessively simple, or perhaps because it is, this is
>>>one of the most difficult concepts for many to grasp. The SubGenius
>>>must HAVE slack. Not get, find, be given, deserve, locate or borrow.
>>>HAVE. Have means only one thing. You can't sort of have slack. You
>>>can't have SOME slack or a lot of slack or a medium amount of slack or
>>>any quantity of slack because slack is not quantitative. Either you
>>>have it or you don't. The SubGenius must have slack. You either have
>>>it or you don't. Having slack isn't what makes you a SubGenius. Being
>>>a SubGenius is what makes you have slack.
>>>
>>>I didn't just invent this. It is not a debatable point. If your idea
>>>is different from this, your idea is wrong.
>>
>>Well I agree totally that that is what being a subgenius WAS, that WAS
>>the dogma. "The Subgenius must have slack". But that was a long time
>>ago, that was like the 80's. Dogma has to change to fit the time.
>>
>>The dogma now is "The Subgenius must be courteous and friendly". It's
>>like "The Subgenius must have slack" but just kinda UPDATED a little.
>>It's not a CHANGE, it's just REPHRASED in a more modern way, just to
>>account for changes in language. I mean let's face it, a lot of us
>>have to pump gas and work as greeters in department stores to stay
>>alive. I think being courteous and friendly to the customer has
>>always been one of the CORE VALUES of the Subgenius.
>>
>>Another new dogma that should replace the out-of-date "The Subgenius
>>must have slack" is "The Subgenius should get to work on time in the
>>morning". Again, this isn't really a -change-, it's just brushing up
>>the language a little. Also "The Subgenius is always well-groomed and
>>cheerful".
>>
>>I mean I think it's SO TOTALLY GREAT that we have LEGACY subgeniuses
>>like nenslo around. Don't get me WRONG. You guys MADE Subgenius what
>>it is. It's just not fair TO YOU that you have to do all the work.
>>You should be able to relax and let the younger subgeniuses take care
>>of BORING stuff like establishing dogma.
>
> isn't ANYBODY going to kill me?
>
>
KILL you??!?! When you make SO MUCH SENSE??!?
--
12th Epochalyptic Dungeon of The Church of Our Lady of Perpetual Motion
Cathedral, Carwash and Dancehall- Home of the Traci Lords Memorial Brothel
Rev. DJ Epoch - proprietor and janitor
Divine Southern Redneck Yeti Clench Recruitment site: http://revdjepoch.COM
"Yeah yeah. It's all fun and games until someone ingests a quantum
singularity and implodes!!"
-- DJ Epoch
"People from other countries are so goddamned foreign. I hope they stay
where they come from."
-- HellPope Huey
Posted by:: brthrn@dangermedia.org
Date: 2 Mar 2005 14:49:21 -0800
--------
So. Tell me. How many times did that tiny dicked bastard of a father of
yours have to fuck that babboon whore of a mother of yours up the
skanky hiney hole before she became pregnant with your scabby dork ass?
Just a goddamn guess. On your part. Would be appreciated. Fat boy.
--------
In article <1109803761.082961.37600@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>,
brthrn@dangermedia.org wrote:
> So. Tell me. How many times did that tiny dicked bastard of a father of
> yours have to fuck that babboon whore of a mother of yours up the
> skanky hiney hole before she became pregnant with your scabby dork ass?
> > Just a goddamn guess. On your part. Would be appreciated. Fat boy.
None. A lesbian upstairs dipped a turkey baster in rhino sperm and gave
my mother the Easy-Off treatment while she was passed out on gin. That's
where I got this horn.
--
HellPope Huey
Yeah, verily, I say unto you,
stomp ye not the flaming fudge bag,
keepeth thy shoes pure.
Humor has as big a fist as any other form
or maybe bigger.
~ James Thurber
"It looks like Bob knows something
the other team doesn't!"
- Enzyte commercial
Posted by:: Rev DJ Epoch Date: 3 Mar 2005 14:01:53 GMT
--------
HellPope Huey wrote in news:Grinningbastard-
A80AC3.17541002032005@news1.west.earthlink.net:
> In article <1109803761.082961.37600@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>,
> brthrn@dangermedia.org wrote:
>
>> So. Tell me. How many times did that tiny dicked bastard of a father of
>> yours have to fuck that babboon whore of a mother of yours up the
>> skanky hiney hole before she became pregnant with your scabby dork ass?
>> > Just a goddamn guess. On your part. Would be appreciated. Fat boy.
>
> None. A lesbian upstairs dipped a turkey baster in rhino sperm and gave
> my mother the Easy-Off treatment while she was passed out on gin. That's
> where I got this horn.
>
You forgot to ask him "...and what's YOUR excuse?" I would have asked him
directly except he's buried in my killfile under "frootbats".
--
12th Epochalyptic Dungeon of The Church of Our Lady of Perpetual Motion
Cathedral, Carwash and Dancehall- Home of the Traci Lords Memorial Brothel
Rev. DJ Epoch - proprietor and janitor
Divine Southern Redneck Yeti Clench Recruitment site: http://revdjepoch.COM
"Yeah yeah. It's all fun and games until someone ingests a quantum
singularity and implodes!!"
-- DJ Epoch
"People from other countries are so goddamned foreign. I hope they stay
where they come from."
-- HellPope Huey
--------
In article ,
Rev DJ Epoch wrote:
> Zapanaz wrote in
> news:lqbc21ps5cdigfaugeqla7uq57l1mbrm4j@4ax.com:
> > isn't ANYBODY going to kill me?
> KILL you??!?! When you make SO MUCH SENSE??!?
No shit. On the contrary, I give generously to organizations devoted to
SAVING hordes of free-range Cosby. Its worked pretty well so far, except
for that time one sector thought I meant Bill.
--
HellPope Huey
Yeah, verily, I say unto you,
stomp ye not the flaming fudge bag,
keepeth thy shoes pure.
Humor has as big a fist as any other form
or maybe bigger.
~ James Thurber
"It looks like Bob knows something
the other team doesn't!"
- Enzyte commercial
Posted by:: Rev DJ Epoch Date: 3 Mar 2005 13:36:55 GMT
--------
HellPope Huey wrote in news:Grinningbastard-
0DB7E4.17520302032005@news1.west.earthlink.net:
> In article ,
> Rev DJ Epoch wrote:
>> Zapanaz wrote in
>> news:lqbc21ps5cdigfaugeqla7uq57l1mbrm4j@4ax.com:
>
>> > isn't ANYBODY going to kill me?
>
>> KILL you??!?! When you make SO MUCH SENSE??!?
>
> No shit. On the contrary, I give generously to organizations devoted to
> SAVING hordes of free-range Cosby. Its worked pretty well so far, except
> for that time one sector thought I meant Bill.
>
You are such an inhumanitarian.
--
12th Epochalyptic Dungeon of The Church of Our Lady of Perpetual Motion
Cathedral, Carwash and Dancehall- Home of the Traci Lords Memorial Brothel
Rev. DJ Epoch - proprietor and janitor
Divine Southern Redneck Yeti Clench Recruitment site: http://revdjepoch.COM
"Yeah yeah. It's all fun and games until someone ingests a quantum
singularity and implodes!!"
-- DJ Epoch
"People from other countries are so goddamned foreign. I hope they stay
where they come from."
-- HellPope Huey
--------
Zapanaz wrote:
> On Tue, 01 Mar 2005 18:29:51 -0800, Zapanaz
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 23:38:28 -0800, nenslo wrote:
>>
>>> Even though it is excessively simple, or perhaps because it is,
>>> this is one of the most difficult concepts for many to grasp. The
>>> SubGenius must HAVE slack. Not get, find, be given, deserve,
>>> locate or borrow. HAVE. Have means only one thing. You can't sort
>>> of have slack. You can't have SOME slack or a lot of slack or a
>>> medium amount of slack or any quantity of slack because slack is
>>> not quantitative. Either you have it or you don't. The SubGenius
>>> must have slack. You either have it or you don't. Having slack
>>> isn't what makes you a SubGenius. Being a SubGenius is what makes
>>> you have slack.
>>>
>>> I didn't just invent this. It is not a debatable point. If your
>>> idea is different from this, your idea is wrong.
>>
>> Well I agree totally that that is what being a subgenius WAS, that
>> WAS the dogma. "The Subgenius must have slack". But that was a
>> long time ago, that was like the 80's. Dogma has to change to fit
>> the time.
>>
>> The dogma now is "The Subgenius must be courteous and friendly".
>> It's like "The Subgenius must have slack" but just kinda UPDATED a
>> little. It's not a CHANGE, it's just REPHRASED in a more modern way,
>> just to account for changes in language. I mean let's face it, a
>> lot of us have to pump gas and work as greeters in department stores
>> to stay alive. I think being courteous and friendly to the customer
>> has always been one of the CORE VALUES of the Subgenius.
>>
>> Another new dogma that should replace the out-of-date "The Subgenius
>> must have slack" is "The Subgenius should get to work on time in the
>> morning". Again, this isn't really a -change-, it's just brushing up
>> the language a little. Also "The Subgenius is always well-groomed
>> and cheerful".
>>
>> I mean I think it's SO TOTALLY GREAT that we have LEGACY subgeniuses
>> like nenslo around. Don't get me WRONG. You guys MADE Subgenius
>> what it is. It's just not fair TO YOU that you have to do all the
>> work. You should be able to relax and let the younger subgeniuses
>> take care of BORING stuff like establishing dogma.
>
> isn't ANYBODY going to kill me?
Oh so THAT'S what you said. My newsreader ate your post. Yes,
certainly I will kill you now! Meet me in front of the library at 7 PM!