From: RickyColeclough@aol.com (Werewolfy)
Date: Wed, Jun 2, 2004
wetrover@webtv.net (marsrules) wrote:
> That is a good question but it is structurally
flawed.
> The word "shape" implys a 3-d object
in space-time which is not the
> case with the multiverse. In the multiverse there
is no time or
> shapes.
> To help laymen envision a multiverse the image
of soap bubbles seem to
> work best. I prefer the image of a cell deviding
until it becomes a
> larger organism as a physical representation of
the nonphysical
> multiverse.
================================================================================
Perhaps if you were capable of spelling, implies' correctly,
your
babbling nonsense might have more credence. Who knows.
You may well prefer, "I prefer the image of a cell
deviding until it
becomes a
larger organism as a physical representation of the
nonphysical
multiverse."
I would prefer were you to stop making up words, and
trying to impress
with a 'knowledge' that is no more than the ravings
of a madman.
Werewolfy
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: wetrover@webtv.net (marsrules)
kiss my madman you mental midget. Now go howl at the moon.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: buyanovsky@attbi.com (George Buyanovsky)
wetrover@webtv.net (marsrules) wrote:
> You are a worthless troll unable to understand
these concepts because
> of your intense hatred of any idea you consider
supernatural. Quantum
> Physics is fact. The multiverse and parallel realities
are proven by
> quantum computation. This definition of reality
is more consistent
> with science than your antiquated world view, troll.
Is the argument like "worthless troll" is
a part of your polemical
skill? Probably it is just a bad manner.
Nevertheless I've been really fascinated by implications
of multiverse
ideas since it looks (for me) very economic way to answer
the most
basic questions about existence itself. We may look
at existence
phenomena, as it is the direct implication of multiverse
construct.
One of basics of existence is the following to a particular
consistent
set of laws. Otherwise you would run into difficulty
to establish
transitive relations between things (whatever it is).
The particular
consistent set of laws is not defined by God but it
is a result of
natural selection (see Smolin/Linde). The observer is
the direct
consequence of this natural selection. The most intrigue
part of this
picture is the role of observer awareness in forming
of this set. The
natural selection of consistent set is the process where
observer and
"reality" is mutually dependent. It means
that observer is able to
affect (to chose) "reality" at extent it does
not violate the
consistency of it. The trick is that consistency is
a function of
awareness ;o)
The multiverse is not a sandwich of realities it is
enormously vast
space of realities with unmapped trails of existence.
I would say
axiomatic noise or superposition of all God's dreams
;o)
Best,
George
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: GM <ggg@nospam.com>
buyanovsky@attbi.com (George Buyanovsky)wrote:
>The multiverse is not a sandwich of realities it
is enormously vast
>space of realities with unmapped trails of existence.
I would say
>axiomatic noise or superposition of all God's dreams
;o)
When you resolve the chaos theory, let us know.
Good damned thing the Universe doesn't work according to your dreams.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Parallel universes proven by Quantum Computers
buyanovsky@attbi.com (George Buyanovsky) wrote:
> wetrover@webtv.net (marsrules) wrote:
> > buyanovsky@attbi.com (George Buyanovsky) wrote:
> > > jha_amin@yahoo.com (jha_amin) wrote:
> > >
> > > > This is kind of cool:
> > >
> > > It is not "cool" it is sad
;~\
With comments of that nature you show your trollish
intent. You are
probably one of my stalkers, Jason Z. Christie or Dean
Humphries. You
seem to know how to cut and paste so that means you
are likely to be
Jason.
> The multiverse is not a sandwich of realities it
is enormously vast
> space of realities with unmapped trails of existence.
The difference you see between sandwich and space is
not well defined.
Words such as space, sandwich, trail, vast do not apply
to a construct
not made of space-time.
> axiomatic noise or superposition of all God's dreams ;o)
There may be some truth to that but the concept of God
in a multiverse
is much different than the God viewed by a brane dweller.
After all
most amateurs think that the material world witnessed
is the end all
of creation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Robert J. Kolker" <robert_kolker@hotmail.com>
marsrules wrote:
> There may be some truth to that but the concept
of God in a multiverse
> is much different than the God viewed by a brane
dweller. After all
> most amateurs think that the material world witnessed
is the end all
> of creation.
This is utter nonsense.
Bob Kolker
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: nenslo <nenslo@yahoox.com>
marsrules wrote:
> With comments of that nature you show your trollish
intent. You are
> probably one of my stalkers, Jason Z. Christie
or Dean Humphries. You
> seem to know how to cut and paste so that means
you are likely to be
> Jason.
I'm not either of them but I don't think you can even
prove the
existence of THIS universe. Not by writing words in
a newsgroup anyway.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: OM <spam@nospam.com>
'Fraid they can. There's a few very, very angry government
agents who have
access to remote viewing equipment, and so do the Chinese,
Japanese and the
Russians -- as well as a fee other countries.
I can guarantee if you cross post to alt.alien.visitors
they know who you
are (unless you're being EM protected) and whether or
not they want to do
something to you.
It's a free for all now that globalism is threatening
everyone's freedom
around the world. And Americans are not on the top
of anyone's good guy
list globally right now.
I
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Joe Cosby <http://joecosby.com/code/mail.pl>
OM
!
You're a kook, George.
--
Joe Cosby
http://joecosby.com/
when your mommy and daddy were
dropping you on your head when you were a baby, did
they say 'boing
boing boing' while you were bouncing, or did they just
maintain a
dignified silence?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: OM <spam@nospam.com>
Watch it buster.
Just remember who you have intentionally tried to harm.
No one wants a dictatorship of war crazed zealots who
kill anyone or
everything for profit, and they won't tolerate anyone
aiding them either.
You can lead people to slaughter, but when the going
gets tough and
everything is on the line globally, as it is right now,
you've got an
unstable pressure cooker and even the think tank bean
counters can't predict
what will happen.
And remember this, never EVER in the history of the
world has any government
lasted forever.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Joe Cosby <http://joecosby.com/code/mail.pl>
OM <spam@nospam.com> wrote:
>No one wants a dictatorship of war crazed zealots
who kill anyone or
>everything
Well just because a bunch of guys are war-crazed dictators
bent on
killing everybody in the world doesn't make them ALL
bad.
>And remember this, never EVER in the history of
the world has any government
>lasted forever.
Well GOSH. That's TRUE. SO FAR, there HASN'T been one!
Who are you, who are so deeply wise in the knowledge
of the incredibly
fucking obvious?
--
Joe Cosby
http://joecosby.com/
Any technology distinguishable from Magic is insufficiently
advanced
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: OM <spam@nospam.com>
Joe Cosby <http://joecosby.com/code/mail.pl> wrote:
>Well just because a bunch of guys are war-crazed
dictators bent on
>killing everybody in the world doesn't make them
ALL bad.
It's about intent, objectivity and the greater good
of everyone else who
lives on this planet. Killing solely for profit is
about as low as it gets
on the evolutionary scale.
>>And remember this, never EVER in the history
of the world has any government
>>lasted forever.
>Well GOSH. That's TRUE. SO FAR, there HASN'T been one!
>Who are you, who are so deeply wise in the knowledge
of the incredibly
>fucking obvious?
Stand back and be objective, the obvious hits you like a ton of bricks:)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: nenslo <nenslo@yahoox.com>
OM wrote:
> It's about intent, objectivity and the greater
good of everyone else who
> lives on this planet. Killing solely for profit
is about as low as it gets
> on the evolutionary scale.
It's ironic then that the only ones who do it are generally
agreed to
belong to the species which is about as high as it gets
on the
evolutionary scale. In fact, a species needs to develop
extremely
complicated abstractions like profit and intent and
the greater good to
even be capable of such an act. Eye diddly ronic.
That reminds me of a joke I wrote.
Q: What's Ned Flanders' favorite country?
A: Italy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: OM <spam@nospam.com>
nenslo <nenslo@yahoox.com> wrote:
> In fact, a species needs to develop extremely
>complicated abstractions like profit and intent
and the greater good to
>even be capable of such an act.
Human society is male driven, thus all the destruction
and controlling
behavior.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Dr. Flonkenstein" <gregoriy_raspoutine_NOSPAM_@hotmail.com>
Mmm, they certainly like such statements in soc.men,
happily corssposted!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Joe Cosby <http://joecosby.com/code/mail.pl>
OM <spam@nospam.com> wrote:
>It's about intent, objectivity and the greater good
of everyone else who
>lives on this planet. Killing solely for profit
is about as low as it gets
>on the evolutionary scale.
No, it's about "you're posting a load of incoherent
pseudo-visionary
babble" and I'm making fun of you for it.
The crap you're posting makes no sense. Get in line.
You are one of
a half-dozen lunatics posting incoherent babble and
jumping up and
down screaming "THIS IS THE ANSWER TO EVERYTHING!"
on alt.slack right
now.
None of your replies to people in this thread have had
any relation to
the things you are replying to. When person A says
"what time is it?"
and person B says "SPINNING AARDVARKS PATRIARCHAL
DEATH FANTASY!" then
this is a sign that person B is a FUCKING LUNATIC.
HTH
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: OM <spam@nospam.com>
Joe Cosby <http://joecosby.com/code/mail.pl> wrote:
>>And remember this, never EVER in the history
of the world has any government
>>lasted forever.
>Well GOSH. That's TRUE. SO FAR, there HASN'T been one!
And also remember that the only plan for the future
which has been made is
one of total world globalization and domination by a
hand full of
corporations where the US military is their 'police
force' . It's a grim
picture of total servitude to the 'world state corporations'.
And these
corporations care nothing about environment, health
or human rights, just
profit.
No one wants that -- so we have a global war of terrorism
now, with more and
more people fighting.
The world is literally coming apart at the seams.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: nenslo <nenslo@yahoox.com>
OM wrote:
> Joe Cosby <http://joecosby.com/code/mail.pl>
wrote:
> >>And remember this, never EVER in the history
of the world has any government
> >>lasted forever.
> >Well GOSH. That's TRUE. SO FAR, there HASN'T been one!
> And also remember that the only plan for the future
which has been made is
> one of total world globalization and domination
by a hand full of
> corporations where the US military is their 'police
force' . It's a grim
> picture of total servitude to the 'world state
corporations'. And these
> corporations care nothing about environment, health
or human rights, just
> profit.
I agree with this part of this post.
> No one wants that -- so we have a global war of
terrorism now, with more and
> more people fighting.
Actually, someone must want it or it wouldn't be happening.
> The world is literally coming apart at the seams.
Literally? You mean as in figuratively? Because the
world doesn't
actually have seams.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: OM <spam@nospam.com>
nenslo <nenslo@yahoox.com> wrote:
>> No one wants that -- so we have a global war
of terrorism now, with more and
>> more people fighting.
>Actually, someone must want it or it wouldn't be happening.
Behavioral response to repression.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "C.R. Osterwald" <rio@dev.null>
Joe Cosby wrote:
> Who are you, who are so deeply wise in the knowledge
of the incredibly
> fucking obvious?
Joe Cosby, let me introduce Alexa Cameron, Kook of the
Month nominee
currently using the sockpuppet "OM".
-=-=-=-=-
Official AFA-B Bully, Pest, Antagonist, Gubmint Disinformation
Agent, "Dr. Green" Sockpuppet, and Chief AFA-B
Vote Rustler.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: nenslo <nenslo@yahoox.com>
Fucking Joe Cosby is always leading people to slaughter,
the war crazed
zealot. Everybody hates him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: OM <spam@nospam.com>
You won't have long to wag war, human beings will be extinct soon.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: nenslo <nenslo@yahoox.com>
OM wrote:
>nenslo <nenslo@yahoox.com> wrote:
> >marsrules wrote:
> >> With comments of that nature you show
your trollish intent. You are
> >> probably one of my stalkers, Jason Z.
Christie or Dean Humphries. You
> >> seem to know how to cut and paste so that
means you are likely to be
> >> Jason.
> >I'm not either of them but I don't think you
can even prove the
> >existence of THIS universe. Not by writing
words in a newsgroup anyway.
> 'Fraid they can. There's a few very, very angry
government agents who have
> access to remote viewing equipment, and so do the
Chinese, Japanese and the
> Russians -- as well as a fee other countries.
HEY, ME TOO! I watched part of that Star Trek show tonight.
> I can guarantee if you cross post to alt.alien.visitors
they know who you
> are (unless you're being EM protected) and whether
or not they want to do
> something to you.
Well they are doing better than me. I hardly even know
who, or if, I am.
> It's a free for all now that globalism is threatening
everyone's freedom
> around the world. And Americans are not on the
top of anyone's good guy
> list globally right now.
Well damn. WHEN DID ALL THAT START? After all Americans
have done for
everyone, blowing their stuff up and then paying to
have it built up
again, overthrowing their governments and making new
ones and then
overthrowing the new ones when they start to get the
idea they can just
elect anybody they want. Why wouldn't people just love
that I wonder.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: OM <spam@nospam.com>
nenslo <nenslo@yahoox.com> wrote:
>HEY, ME TOO! I watched part of that Star Trek show
tonight.
It's gullible idiots like you who are no threat to those in the know.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: nenslo <nenslo@yahoox.com>
Well I didn't say I liked that Star Trek show. I didn't
really. But I
had been reading the Mahabharata and I had to take a
rest because I
couldn't remember whether it was Dhritarashtra or Duryodhana
that was
the bad guy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: OM <spam@nospam.com>
nenslo <nenslo@yahoox.com> wrote:
>After all Americans have done for
>everyone, blowing their stuff up and then paying
to have it built up
>again, overthrowing their governments and making
new ones and then
>overthrowing the new ones when they start to get
the idea they can just
>elect anybody they want. Why wouldn't people just
love that I wonder.
Stick around and watch. It's going to be quite a show.:)
CIAO BABY
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: nenslo <nenslo@yahoox.com>
No way. I am getting out of here as soon as I can. And don't call me baby.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: OM <spam@nospam.com>
nenslo <nenslo@yahoox.com> wrote:
>No way. I am getting out of here as soon as I can.
So is everyone else. 98% of the world know the human show on earth is over.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: wetrover@webtv.net (marsrules)
The USA is gonna get hit hard it looks like. The world
won't end but
without electricity most americans will wish it did.
In
alt.prophecies.nostradamus we have started a pool. I
envision 20,000
americans dead with three simultaneous bombs which distribute
sulphuric acid or other lethal agents. See the foiled
Jordanian attack
for a description of the truck bombs I think B.Laden
is gonna blow in
america between june 8 and nov.11.
Original file name: Re- Parallel univers#1AD251.txt - converted on Saturday, 25 September 2004, 02:05
This page was created using TextToHTML. TextToHTML is a free software for Macintosh and is (c) 1995,1996 by Kris Coppieters