From: iDRMRSR <idrmrsr@subgenius.com>
Newsgroups: alt.slack
Date: Tue, Oct 22, 2002 8:16 PM
I have another bone to pick with the media.
Until a dead person is proven to have been shot by the
sniper, the
cadaver MAY NOT be properly described as a VICTIM.
Indeed, the decedent
must be proven to have some sort of innocence in the
matter at first,
before being beknighted as a VICTIM. Once innocence
is established, the
title of VICTIM may be bestowed. And once the shooter
of the victim is
conclusively proven to have killed all the others, then
the shootee
becomes a SNIPER VICTIM.
And the dead one cannot be said to have been MURDERED
until the shooter
is convicted in a court of law of the crime of MURDER.
Neither can the
shooter be described as crazy or deranged, until that
is diagnosed by a
licensed mental health practitioner.
I think the biggest crime here is the assault on the
precision of
LANGUAGE, which is TRULY the MURDERED VICTIM here.
[*]
-----
Original file name: Sniper Nomenclature.t.txt - converted on Friday, 13 June 2003, 22:41
This page was created using TextToHTML. TextToHTML is a free software for Macintosh and is (c) 1995,1996 by Kris Coppieters