Subject: Warspeak Alert

From: zosodada@aol.com (Zosodada)
Newsgroups: alt.slack
Date: Tue, Apr 8, 2003 4:07 AM
Message-ID: <20030408040729.08584.00000597@mb-fq.aol.com>

"Residential Areas" shall now be termed "Leadership Targets."

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: Re: Warspeak Alert
From: "Rev. 11D Meow!" <Meow@Kitty-Kitty.org>
Newsgroups: alt.slack
Date: Tue, Apr 8, 2003 4:09 AM
Message-ID: <rtvka.20670$7w2.19483@nwrddc01.gnilink.net>

And 'pesticide' is 'nerve gas'.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: Re: Warspeak Alert
From: zosodada@aol.com (Zosodada)
Newsgroups: alt.slack
Date: Tue, Apr 8, 2003 4:21 AM
Message-ID: <20030408042112.08584.00000602@mb-fq.aol.com>

Subject: Re: Warspeak Alert From: "Rev. 11D Meow!" Meow@Kitty-Kitty.org, "And
'pesticide' is 'nerve gas'."

Well, this forces me to admit that pesticides can be nerve gas or other
chemical weapons (depends on the dose) and that residential areas may house
leadership targets (an example of Saddam making human shields of his own
people); however, the take on the survival of Saddam by the US earlier today
seemed to be "well, whether he is alive or not, it's inconsequential" yet there
must have been an executive order (from G. Bush II?) to strike this residential
area. Why authorize the potential killing civillians for something
"inconsequential"? This may be Bush's biggest error. I'm pissed.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: Re: Warspeak Alert
From: nenslo <nenslo@yahooX.com>
Newsgroups: alt.slack
Date: Tue, Apr 8, 2003 4:55 AM
Message-ID: <3E928E74.7C14D0F9@yahooX.com>

Zosodada wrote:
>
> Subject: Re: Warspeak Alert From: "Rev. 11D Meow!" Meow@Kitty-Kitty.org, "And
> 'pesticide' is 'nerve gas'."
>
> Well, this forces me to admit that pesticides can be nerve gas or other
> chemical weapons (depends on the dose) and that residential areas may house
> leadership targets (an example of Saddam making human shields of his own
> people); however, the take on the survival of Saddam by the US earlier today
> seemed to be "well, whether he is alive or not, it's inconsequential" yet there
> must have been an executive order (from G. Bush II?) to strike this residential
> area. Why authorize the potential killing civillians for something
> "inconsequential"? This may be Bush's biggest error.

It wasn't an error.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: Re: Warspeak Alert
From: zosodada@aol.com (Zosodada)
Newsgroups: alt.slack
Date: Tue, Apr 8, 2003 4:50 AM
Message-ID: <20030408045025.08584.00000608@mb-fq.aol.com>

"Fuck up" then.

Back to document index

Original file name: Warspeak Alert - converted on Monday, 21 July 2003, 13:45