Scientology is censoring my music

From: "Rev. Ivan Stang" <stang@subgenius.com>
Newsgroups: alt.slack
Date: Mon, Feb 18, 2002

In article <3C707CF4.E7D1B4A@yahoo.com>, El Queso
<the_cheese_23@yahoo.com> wrote:

> "Rev. Ivan Stang" wrote:
> > Who is this "alecto" shadow-boxer? The name seems vaguely familiar.
> >
> > But more important than that, why are the ancient SubGenius mummies
> > from 1996 suddenly coming out of retirement, and posting again? It's
> > like a damn haunted house around here all of a sudden. I thought most
> > of these people were DEAD.
>
> It wouldn't suprise me if it was sockpuppet Scientologists using old
> ID's. A little comparrison of writing styles may be interesting. It's
> probably not, but they have been busted doing exactly that many times.

No, actually I know who alecto is, he's an old SubGenius and an old
friend. REAL REAL old, almost as old as me.

He's a critic's critic, that's for sure.

If you boys are gonna fight, go out back so you don't break any of the
valuables.

Maybe I should get Sterno and Philo involved in this, then you'll hear
some butthole and anus talk. And it won't stop at something CUTE like
necrotic anal fissure tissue.

--
4th Stangian Orthodox MegaFisTemple Lodge of the Wrath of Dobbs Yeti,
Resurrected
P.O. Box 181417, Cleveland, OH 44118 (fax 216-320-9528)
A subsidiary of:
The SubGenius Foundation, Inc. / P.O. Box 140306, Dallas, TX 75214
SubSITE: http://www.subgenius.com PRABOB
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Rev. Ivan Stang" <stang@subgenius.com>

In article <a4qdau022d3@enews1.newsguy.com>, Two Beans
<twobeans@godhatesyou.com> wrote:
> Rev. Ivan Stang wrote:
> > Where did that song "Bob Dobbs" by The Four Letter Words come from?
>
> It came from my Discordian friend. He collects all sortsa wierd mp3 schtuff.
> As for the creators of said music, well... I found some info on them. I'm
> gonna be a lazy Rewardian and just c&p the url for the search I did.
>
> http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&q=four+letter+words+bob+dobbs

Hmmm... couldn't find how to locate the band. Didn't try very hard. I'm
surprised they didn't at least end a copy of that song to the PO Box in
Dallas.

> > I did the anti-TwoBeans blathering like you asked... will email MP3
> > soon.
>
> And I thank you for that. The end product is on abs as I type.

I liked Legume's yellings best out of that series -- sounded the most
heartfelt.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Rev. Ivan Stang" <stang@subgenius.com>

In article <3C70B86E.F1858B98@eumenides.edu>, alecto
<alecto@eumenides.edu> wrote:

> El Queso wrote:
>
> > I said ONE - does one always mean butthole to you. You are very
> > interested in my talking about asses, aren't you? I am actually only
> > taling about slack, you silly cunt, you just don't get it. When you talk
> > about Hubbard's true life, his anus keeps coming up in signifigant
> > places. I'm pushing them to the point where they must ignore me or kill
> > me. Do you understand that, or do you just like to quote axioms like a
> > Bobby?
> > I'm making fun of a bunch of silly cunts - if you wanna get in line,
> > take a number. We'll get to you eventually. I'm only queer for Prarie
> > Squid and A-Team episodes. But I know a place where I can rent you out
> > behind a glory hole again if you still need the cash and you have some
> > needs unfulfilled.
> > You wanna schism, we schism like no other.
>
> You are QUEEEER FOR HIM. You think about Ron every day. You avidly lap up
> every tidbit of information you get about him. Your heart beats faster
> when you hear his name. You write songs about him. You are an L. Ron Homo!
>
> Quote that axiom!

Will you two kids stop your manly homoerotic teasing and horseplay, and
get back to your desks? Mr. Dobbs wants that report turned in by 3.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Rev. Ivan Stang" <stang@subgenius.com>

This Hot Sex Money Talk is starting to turn me on.

In article <3C70EAFE.19227023@yahoo.com>, El Queso
<the_cheese_23@yahoo.com> wrote:
> He is my bitch, I'll give you that, but it's not a sex thing. I have his
> spirit in a little vial I store in your anus. That is what makes you so
> interested in the Hubbard/ Ass connection. You are just projecting that
> trauma onto me. There - I used Dianetics on you. Do you feel better? You
> owe me money.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: joecosby@mindspring.com (Joe Cosby)

mumthra@yoo-ess-ay.net (Mumthra) hunched over a computer, typing
feverishly;
thunder crashed, mumthra@yoo-ess-ay.net (Mumthra) laughed madly, then
wrote:

><stang@subgenius.com> wrote:
>
>>Who is this "alecto" shadow-boxer? The name seems vaguely familiar.
>
>Isn't it not supposed to be Nenslo?
>
>>But more important than that, why are the ancient SubGenius mummies
>>from 1996 suddenly coming out of retirement, and posting again? It's
>>like a damn haunted house around here all of a sudden. I thought most
>>of these people were DEAD.
>
>It was 1999, ya stoner. Being undead and all that, we're gonna potty
>like it's 1998.
>
>Really, though, there seems to be some sort of SIGNAL.
>
>I don't know what's gonna shamble in here next on the undead stinky
>squiggles.
>
>"Discourage not the Badger?"
>

"Ask not for whom the badger tolls."

>Shudder.
>
>---------------------------------------------------
>This was probably posted by Mumthra

--
Joe Cosby
http://joecosby.home.mindspring.com

Careful how you respond, noting who I am, how well I'm in tune with
communicating near future events.....with an established history of
accuracy.

- Another year and another classic Tim Rue quote!

Sig by Kookie Jar 5.98d http://go.to/generalfrenetics/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: HellPope Huey <hellpopehuey@subspamgeenyus.com>

In article <3C70875C.87182BC7@yahoo.com>, El says...
>You have just spoken the words written on my brain. How did you know?
>Queso

Well ye fool, its hangin' right OUT there for anyone to read! You're not
wearing the official Connie Brain Thong to cover it, so you're an open book. Its
a FILTHY read, too. Damn, you're one big goat-humpin' Yeti. Oh well, at least
you satisfied the goat. That's part of why you fit into THIS group so well.
Welcome!

HellPope Huey, hellpopehuey@subgenius.com
Makes me feel like I done dropped trou
for a hillbilly Balrog

"MOVE it, ya ugly Normals!"
- "Futurama"

"Nazis...mein Gott."
- "Von Ryan's Express"

Buckskin Harry had just killed the six desperados,
so he savagely beat the sagebrush
back to the Los Pendecos bar,
for a whiskey, and Lola,
who would hold him down with her massive bulk
and chew off his painful corns.
- St. Nu-Mon
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: alecto <alecto@eumenides.edu>

El Queso wrote:

> He is my bitch, I'll give you that, but it's not a sex thing.

You are HIS bitch. Every time you feel a feeling about him he controls you from the
grave. Every minute you spend thinking about him, reading about him, studying his work,
writing songs about him, you are WORSHIPPING HIM. Why I thought people who use
dianetics on other people are pink losers! But that's only "them" isn't it? "They"
aren't real people like "us." "They" are pink losers, geeks, suckers, niggers,
towelheads, slopes, faggots, who deserve all the abuse we can heap on them and if "they"
decide "they" don't like being described in the most insulting and degrading terms "we"
can think of then "they " "don't have a sense of humor" and are "restricting 'our' free
speech." And if you are dumbass enough to give them tools to use against you, as you
did by stupidly using the fiercely-defended copyrighted materials of an insanely
paranoid organization then you are getting what you deserve, schmuck. Hand them a gun
and if they shoot you with it you whine like a baby. Talk about your pink losers, you
are one of the top ten suckers of the year and it's only February.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: dode <dode(pee)@tystie.com>

El Queso wrote:

> You have just spoken the words written on my brain. How did you
> know? Queso

I'm guessing big rawks and binoculors.

--
doh'd
change the pee to p for email.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: HellPope Huey <hellpopehuey@subspamgeenyus.com>

In article <3c70acfd.100792170@News.CIS.DFN.DE>, joecosby@mindspring.com says...

>ebberybubby is saing GOOD STUFF about me.

I also think you'd look rilly rilly cute kicking the mung out of Martin Short.

HellPope Huey, hellpopehuey@subgenius.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: joecosby@mindspring.com (Joe Cosby)

El Queso <the_cheese_23@yahoo.com> hunched over a computer, typing
feverishly;
thunder crashed, El Queso <the_cheese_23@yahoo.com> laughed madly,
then wrote:

>You have just spoken the words written on my brain. How did you know?

http://zapatopi.net/afdb.html

BE PROTECTED!

--
Joe Cosby
http://joecosby.home.mindspring.com

But if we aren't supposed to eat animals, why are they made out
of meat?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: dode <dode(pee)@tystie.com>

Rev. Ivan Stang wrote:

> But more important than that, why are the ancient SubGenius
> mummies from 1996 suddenly coming out of retirement, and posting
> again? It's like a damn haunted house around here all of a sudden.
> I thought most of these people were DEAD.

Blame it on google groups, the archive got back to 1996 and found a
stack of folks stranded back there in Nenslo's original shut-up
thread, one or two still beating their heads of neo-tech robots and
one still wriggling toward your original virtual butt.

Don't meddle with the past man.

--
doh'd
change the pee to p for email.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: dode <dode(pee)@tystie.com>

Mumthra wrote:

> It was 1999, ya stoner. Being undead and all that, we're gonna
> potty like it's 1998.
>
> Really, though, there seems to be some sort of SIGNAL.
>
> I don't know what's gonna shamble in here next on the undead
> stinky squiggles.
>
> "Discourage not the Badger?"

Now that is just NOT funny.

--
doh'd
change the pee to p for email.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: HellPope Huey <hellpopehuey@subspamgeenyus.com>

In article <180220021247581483%stang@subgenius.com>, "Rev. says...

>Maybe I should get Sterno and Philo involved in this, then you'll hear
>some butthole and anus talk. And it won't stop at something CUTE like
>necrotic anal fissure tissue.

Oh boy, I can't wait to see them perfect that solar-powered suppository. The
one with the clawed treads.

HellPope Huey, hellpopehuey@subgenius.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Two Beans" <twobeans@godhatesyou.com>

"Rev. Ivan Stang" <stang@subgenius.com> wrote in message
news:180220021252519130%stang@subgenius.com...
>
> I liked Legume's yellings best out of that series -- sounded the most
> heartfelt.

"Thank you for the recording, Legume."

"No problem. It was easy. You suck."

That man is an arteest.

--
Two Beans
http://www.eyeofthewarp.com/twobeans
http://www.eyeofthewarp.com/nhgh
http://mp3.com/twobeans

"There, the spark leaps to life. The Golden Age quivers on the brink of
creation. Live, my machine! Live my savior! You have my breath... You have
my dream, my dream."
-The Residents, "Failure / Reconstruction" from the album Mark of the Mole
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: El Queso <the_cheese_23@yahoo.com>

Wow, you seem really upset with me. What's wrong? I'm just poking fun at
a dopey cult. I like my other dopey cults much better. I guess Jello
Biafra worshipped the President in 1982. I guess Larry Flynt worships
Jerry Fallwell, and "Bob" worships "Dick" Dobbs.
This just goes to show what I already knew - every anti has it's anti.
Welcome, stinky shadow.
Queso

alecto wrote:
> You are HIS bitch.
<snip>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: alecto <alecto@eumenides.org>

Where's your sense of humor, el queero? I'm just poking fun at YOU.
Don't tell me you don't like being treated the way you treat others!
Imagine, not enjoying being cruelly ridiculed and abused. How very very odd.

> Wow, you seem really upset with me. What's wrong? I'm just poking fun at
> a dopey cult. I like my other dopey cults much better. I guess Jello
> Biafra worshipped the President in 1982. I guess Larry Flynt worships
> Jerry Fallwell, and "Bob" worships "Dick" Dobbs.

Look at you, trying to apply reason. Like a monkey in a tuxedo, it's a crime
against nature.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: El Queso <the_cheese_23@yahoo.com>

alecto wrote:
> Look at you, trying to apply reason. Like a monkey in a tuxedo, it's a
> crime against nature.

I happen to think monkeys look quite dapper in tuxedos. I also think
nature is a punk who needs a little crime. I apply reason when it suits
me, and illogic when it makes me laugh. I sometimes apply both at the
same time. Sort of like a Zen koan, only more vulgar and tasting vaguely
of Funions.
Queso
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Rev. Ivan Stang" <stang@subgenius.com>

In article <3C72AC0D.FAD90675@socrates.edu>, xanthippe
<xanthippe@socrates.edu> wrote:

> It would be really nice, el queso, if you would put your follow-up comments
> AFTER the thing you're commenting about. That way if there's a whole string
> of comments going back and forth like between you and your new admirer, they
> would appear in the order they were written, and we could all have a pleasant
> laugh without trying to think too much. Thanks!

I disagree, BBB. That's often the best way but it's certainly not a
hard and fast rule. Sometimes it's appropriate to put your own
wonderful wise ass zinger at the top and THEN let the old crap follow.

Now back in my day we often had NO reprint of the previous post's
contents; people would just say their piece and if you had missed the
previous posts then fuck ya- you had to carve the context out of
antlers or bone, using flint chopping tools.

You kids have it EASY these days. Could use a little DISCIPLINE if you
ask me.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Rev. Ivan Stang" <stang@subgenius.com>

In article <3C72AD82.A9C141A3@eumenides.org>, alecto
<alecto@eumenides.org> wrote:
> Look at you, trying to apply reason. Like a monkey in a tuxedo, it's a
> crime against nature.

Oh, great, now you're putting down the organ grinders.

Back to document index

Original file name: Re- Scientology is censoring my - converted on Friday, 20 September 2002, 16:06