Subject: Re: Back from XXXX Day

From: "Pope Phred" <phred523@home.com>
Newsgroups: alt.slack
Date: Wed, Jul 11, 2001 8:26 AM
Message-ID: <FBX27.127264$Q9.31272141@news1.elmhst1.il.home.com>

Geoff Bronner" <geoff.bronner@dartmouth.edu> wrote in message
news:geoff.bronner-ya02408000R0907011505150001@news.dartmouth.edu...
>
> By the way.... pending an official report from the sacred scribe... what
is
> the excuse this year?

In order to make my tab at the Sacred Sales Shack an even $50, I
purchased Pamphlet #1. It had been years since I had read this (I was
working as a security guard at the time) and I thought that since I have had
years upon years of being exposed to the greater Mysteries, I would be
better able to understand the verbiage contained in said pamphlet.

I Was Wrong.

If anything, my lack of ignorance made the pamphlet even MORE
incomprehensible! It was then that I came to the horrible realization that
perhaps this is the type of communication we have been sending the X-ists.
If so, we are doomed.

I remarked out loud, to myself: "Damn! This is more confusing that VCR
instructions!"

Perhaps the X-ists timers have been stuck on the blinking 12:00 all this
time! Perhaps they have only read as far as the Antaren and Epsilonian
translations and haven't gotten around to the Earth Translation. Or worse
yet, what if they collectively said: "Screw't" and proceeded to wander off
to have lunch at the nearest Xist equivalent of Steak & Shake, leaving us in
our over-written, verbose, Purgatory?

For the love of Dobbs, lets make it easy for these guys, from now on, all
official Church communication must be in pictogram form, or failing that,
Cuneiform.

Pope ("Hooked on Scatology" Worked for Me!) Phred
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: Re: Back from XXXX Day
From: geoff.bronner@dartmouth.edu (Geoff Bronner)
Newsgroups: alt.slack
Date: Wed, Jul 11, 2001 12:22 PM
Message-ID: <geoff.bronner-ya02408000R1107011222510001@news.dartmouth.edu>

In article <v3L27.124647$Q9.30777679@news1.elmhst1.il.home.com>, "Pope
Phred" <phred523@home.com> wrote:
>
> For the love of Dobbs, lets make it easy for these guys, from now on, all
>official Church communication must be in pictogram form, or failing that,
>Cuneiform.

Isn't the top page on subsite basically one big pictograph? If they can't
figure that out they must be REALLY dumb. Surely the pleasure saucers have
T3 connections so they can look this up on the 'net.

-G
--

<http://www.dartmouth.edu/~geoffb/>
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: Re: Back from XXXX Day
From: "Pope Phred" <phred523@home.com>
Newsgroups: alt.slack
Date: Wed, Jul 11, 2001 9:28 PM
Message-ID: <r3737.128649$Q9.31683393@news1.elmhst1.il.home.com>

"Geoff Bronner" <geoff.bronner@dartmouth.edu> wrote in message
news:geoff.bronner-ya02408000R1107011222510001@news.dartmouth.edu...
> In article <v3L27.124647$Q9.30777679@news1.elmhst1.il.home.com>, "Pope
> Phred" <phred523@home.com> wrote:
> >
> > For the love of Dobbs, lets make it easy for these guys, from now on,
all
> >official Church communication must be in pictogram form, or failing that,
> >Cuneiform.
>
> Isn't the top page on subsite basically one big pictograph? If they can't
> figure that out they must be REALLY dumb. Surely the pleasure saucers have
> T3 connections so they can look this up on the 'net.

Just because they have better technology doesn't make them smarter.
Perhaps the X-ists rely TOO much on their advanced warez to decipher what
are relatively simple pictograms.

And we thought that was J.R. "Bob" Dobbs Purpose: To be the mediator, to
close the deal, to exchange all of Earth's souls for cheap Wampum. Clearly,
someone has been (dare I say it?) Slacking!

Pope (Big Mug 'O Java) Phred
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: Re: Back from XXXX Day
From: Artemia Salina <y2k@sheayright.com>
Newsgroups: alt.slack
Date: Thu, Jul 12, 2001 3:05 AM
Message-ID: <3B4D4C3C.89370EA5@sheayright.com>

Sister Decadence wrote:
>
> On Wed, 11 Jul 2001 02:28:22 -0400, Artemia Salina
> <y2k@sheayright.com> wrote:
>
> >Geoff Bronner wrote:

> >> Anyway... I'm not fond of the whole 8661 thing so I'm looking for alternate
> >> theories I can steal and combine into something all my own.

> >We didn't generate enough Hatred for the Xists to locate us.

> >And no one can say that I didn't try to do my part.

> >Another YEAR 'til the Xist ships make the loop around
> >the Milky Way and within sensor range of us again!

> If those fucking X-ists had shown, we'd NEVER have had that much
> SLACK!

Well THAT'S more like it! But you're too late sister! The moving
finger writes, and having writ moves on; nor all your piety nor
Hatred shall lure it back to cancel half a line, nor all your
tears wash out a word of it! I.e. you're FUCKED 'til next year!

Have a NICE day!

--
Artemia Salina -- http://www.drpez.com/drali1.htm
Taking the 'rhetorical' out of 'rhetorical question' since 1958
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =-----


Back to document index

Original file name: Re- Back from XXXX Day - converted on Wednesday, 18 July 2001, 06:24

This page was created using TextToHTML. TextToHTML is a free software for Macintosh and is (c) 1995,1996 by Kris Coppieters